Grønseth Rune, Vollmer William M, Hardie Jon A, Ólafsdóttir Inga Sif, Lamprecht Bernd, Buist A Sonia, Gnatiuc Louisa, Gulsvik Amund, Johannessen Ane, Enright Paul
Dept of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen Dept of Thoracic Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen
Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR.
Eur Respir J. 2014 Jun;43(6):1610-20. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00036813. Epub 2013 Oct 31.
Dyspnoea is a cardinal symptom for cardiorespiratory diseases. No study has assessed worldwide variation in dyspnoea prevalence or predictors of dyspnoea. We used cross-sectional data from population-based samples in 15 countries of the Burden of Obstructive Lung Disease (BOLD) study to estimate prevalence of dyspnoea in the full sample, as well as in an a priori defined low-risk group (few risk factors or dyspnoea-associated diseases). Dyspnoea was defined by the modified Medical Research Council questions. We used ordered logistic regression analysis to study the association of dyspnoea with site, sex, age, education, smoking habits, low/high body mass index, self-reported disease and spirometry results. Of the 9484 participants, 27% reported any dyspnoea. In the low-risk subsample (n=4329), 16% reported some dyspnoea. In multivariate analyses, all covariates were correlated to dyspnoea, but only 13% of dyspnoea variation was explained. Females reported more dyspnoea than males (odds ratio ∼2.1). When forced vital capacity fell below 60% of predicted, dyspnoea was much more likely. There was considerable geographical variation in dyspnoea, even when we adjusted for known risk factors and spirometry results. We were only able to explain 13% of dyspnoea variation.
呼吸困难是心肺疾病的主要症状。尚无研究评估全球范围内呼吸困难患病率或其预测因素的差异。我们利用慢性阻塞性肺疾病负担(BOLD)研究中15个国家基于人群样本的横断面数据,来估计整个样本以及一个预先定义的低风险组(风险因素或与呼吸困难相关疾病较少)中呼吸困难的患病率。呼吸困难由改良的医学研究委员会问卷定义。我们采用有序逻辑回归分析来研究呼吸困难与地区、性别、年龄、教育程度、吸烟习惯、低/高体重指数、自我报告疾病及肺量计测量结果之间的关联。在9484名参与者中,27%报告有任何呼吸困难。在低风险子样本(n = 4329)中,16%报告有某种程度的呼吸困难。在多变量分析中,所有协变量均与呼吸困难相关,但仅能解释13%的呼吸困难变异性。女性报告的呼吸困难比男性更多(优势比约为2.1)。当用力肺活量降至预测值的60%以下时,出现呼吸困难的可能性要大得多。即使我们对已知风险因素和肺量计测量结果进行了调整,呼吸困难仍存在相当大的地域差异。我们仅能解释13%的呼吸困难变异性。