Suppr超能文献

具有灵活回波时间的改良狄克逊序列的初步临床应用:与氢质子磁共振波谱法比较进行肝脏和胰腺脂肪评估

Initial clinical application of modified Dixon with flexible echo times: hepatic and pancreatic fat assessments in comparison with (1)H MRS.

作者信息

Livingstone Roshan S, Begovatz Paul, Kahl Sabine, Nowotny Bettina, Strassburger Klaus, Giani Guido, Bunke Jürgen, Roden Michael, Hwang Jong-Hee

机构信息

Metabolic Imaging Group, Institute of Clinical Diabetology, German Diabetes Center at Heinrich-Heine University, Auf dem Hennekamp 65, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.

出版信息

MAGMA. 2014 Oct;27(5):397-405. doi: 10.1007/s10334-013-0421-4. Epub 2013 Dec 4.

Abstract

OBJECTS

Hepatic and pancreatic fat content become increasingly important for phenotyping of individuals with metabolic diseases. This study aimed to (1) evaluate hepatic fat fractions (HFF) and pancreatic fat fractions (PFF) using (1)H magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) and the recently introduced fast mDixon method, and to examine body fat effects on HFF and PFF, (2) investigate regional differences in HFF and PFF by mDixon.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

HFF and PFF were quantified by mDixon with two flexible echo times and by single voxel (1)H MRS in 24 healthy subjects. The regional differences of PFF within the pancreas were assessed with mDixon. Abdominal visceral and subcutaneous fat was assessed by T1-weighted MRI at 3T.

RESULTS

Both methods correlated well for quantification of HFF (r = 0.98, p < 0.0001) and PFF (r = 0.80, p < 0.0001). However, mDixon showed a higher low limit in HFF and PFF. PFF showed no regional differences using mDixon. In addition, both visceral and subcutaneous fat correlated with pancreatic fat, while only visceral fat correlated with liver fat, employing both (1)H MRS and mDixon.

CONCLUSION

The novel and fast two-point mDixon exhibits a good correlation with the gold-standard (1)H MRS for assessment of HFF and PFF, with limited sensitivity for assessing lower fat content.

摘要

目的

肝脏和胰腺脂肪含量对于代谢性疾病个体的表型分析愈发重要。本研究旨在:(1)使用氢质子磁共振波谱法(MRS)和最近引入的快速多 Dixon 方法评估肝脏脂肪分数(HFF)和胰腺脂肪分数(PFF),并研究体脂对 HFF 和 PFF 的影响;(2)通过多 Dixon 方法研究 HFF 和 PFF 的区域差异。

材料与方法

对 24 名健康受试者采用具有两个灵活回波时间的多 Dixon 方法和单体素氢质子 MRS 对 HFF 和 PFF 进行定量分析。采用多 Dixon 方法评估胰腺内 PFF 的区域差异。通过 3T 的 T1 加权磁共振成像评估腹部内脏脂肪和皮下脂肪。

结果

两种方法在 HFF 定量分析方面相关性良好(r = 0.98,p < 0.0001),在 PFF 定量分析方面相关性也良好(r = 0.80,p < 0.0001)。然而,多 Dixon 方法在 HFF 和 PFF 方面显示出更高的下限。使用多 Dixon 方法时,PFF 未显示出区域差异。此外,采用氢质子 MRS 和多 Dixon 方法时,内脏脂肪和皮下脂肪均与胰腺脂肪相关,而只有内脏脂肪与肝脏脂肪相关。

结论

新型快速两点多 Dixon 方法在评估 HFF 和 PFF 方面与金标准氢质子 MRS 具有良好的相关性,但在评估较低脂肪含量时敏感性有限。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验