Enning Dennis, Garrelfs Julia
Max Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology, Bremen, Germany.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2014 Feb;80(4):1226-36. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02848-13. Epub 2013 Dec 6.
About a century ago, researchers first recognized a connection between the activity of environmental microorganisms and cases of anaerobic iron corrosion. Since then, such microbially influenced corrosion (MIC) has gained prominence and its technical and economic implications are now widely recognized. Under anoxic conditions (e.g., in oil and gas pipelines), sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) are commonly considered the main culprits of MIC. This perception largely stems from three recurrent observations. First, anoxic sulfate-rich environments (e.g., anoxic seawater) are particularly corrosive. Second, SRB and their characteristic corrosion product iron sulfide are ubiquitously associated with anaerobic corrosion damage, and third, no other physiological group produces comparably severe corrosion damage in laboratory-grown pure cultures. However, there remain many open questions as to the underlying mechanisms and their relative contributions to corrosion. On the one hand, SRB damage iron constructions indirectly through a corrosive chemical agent, hydrogen sulfide, formed by the organisms as a dissimilatory product from sulfate reduction with organic compounds or hydrogen ("chemical microbially influenced corrosion"; CMIC). On the other hand, certain SRB can also attack iron via withdrawal of electrons ("electrical microbially influenced corrosion"; EMIC), viz., directly by metabolic coupling. Corrosion of iron by SRB is typically associated with the formation of iron sulfides (FeS) which, paradoxically, may reduce corrosion in some cases while they increase it in others. This brief review traces the historical twists in the perception of SRB-induced corrosion, considering the presently most plausible explanations as well as possible early misconceptions in the understanding of severe corrosion in anoxic, sulfate-rich environments.
大约一个世纪前,研究人员首次认识到环境微生物的活动与厌氧铁腐蚀案例之间的联系。从那时起,这种微生物影响的腐蚀(MIC)就备受关注,其技术和经济影响如今已得到广泛认可。在缺氧条件下(例如在石油和天然气管道中),硫酸盐还原菌(SRB)通常被认为是MIC的主要元凶。这种看法主要源于三个反复出现的观察结果。首先,富含硫酸盐的缺氧环境(如缺氧海水)具有特别强的腐蚀性。其次,SRB及其特有的腐蚀产物硫化铁与厌氧腐蚀损伤普遍相关,第三,在实验室培养的纯培养物中,没有其他生理类群会产生同样严重的腐蚀损伤。然而,关于其潜在机制及其对腐蚀的相对贡献仍有许多悬而未决的问题。一方面,SRB通过一种腐蚀性化学剂——硫化氢间接破坏铁结构,硫化氢是这些微生物利用有机化合物或氢气进行硫酸盐异化还原产生的产物(“化学微生物影响的腐蚀”;CMIC)。另一方面,某些SRB也可以通过夺取电子来侵蚀铁(“电化学微生物影响的腐蚀”;EMIC),即直接通过代谢耦合。SRB对铁的腐蚀通常与硫化铁(FeS)的形成有关,但矛盾的是,硫化铁在某些情况下可能会减少腐蚀,而在其他情况下则会加剧腐蚀。这篇简短的综述追溯了对SRB引起的腐蚀认识的历史曲折,考虑了目前最合理的解释以及在理解缺氧、富含硫酸盐环境中的严重腐蚀时可能存在的早期误解。