• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会地位与对积极社会身份的追求:高地位和低地位群体在群体间分化与歧视方面的系统领域。

Social status and the pursuit of positive social identity: Systematic domains of intergroup differentiation and discrimination for high- and low- status groups.

作者信息

Oldmeadow Julian A, Fiske Susan T

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK.

出版信息

Group Process Intergroup Relat. 2010 Jul;13(4). doi: 10.1177/1368430209355650.

DOI:10.1177/1368430209355650
PMID:24319344
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3852744/
Abstract

Research on intergroup discrimination has focused on the cognitive and motivational mechanisms involved, but the role of stereotype content has been neglected. Drawing on social identity theory and stereotype content research, the current studies investigated the role of stereotype content in intergroup differentiation and discrimination. Across two studies, students from high- and low-status groups differentiated themselves positively on stereotypes of competence and warmth respectively, and in allocations of resources in domains relevant to competence (academics, research) and warmth (sports, community outreach). Furthermore, there was evidence that discrimination by high- and low-status groups was driven by their respective stereotypes of competence and warmth. It is argued that stereotypes of competence and warmth, derived from status and power relations between groups, define the domains in which groups pursue positively distinct identities.

摘要

关于群体间歧视的研究主要集中在其中涉及的认知和动机机制上,但刻板印象内容的作用却被忽视了。基于社会认同理论和刻板印象内容研究,当前的研究调查了刻板印象内容在群体间分化和歧视中的作用。在两项研究中,来自高地位和低地位群体的学生分别在能力和热情的刻板印象上对自己进行了积极的区分,并且在与能力相关的领域(学术、研究)和热情相关的领域(体育、社区外展)的资源分配上也有体现。此外,有证据表明,高地位和低地位群体的歧视是由他们各自关于能力和热情的刻板印象驱动的。有人认为,源自群体间地位和权力关系的能力和热情的刻板印象,界定了群体追求积极独特身份的领域。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43f8/3852744/b02c1fb007f2/nihms528541f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43f8/3852744/4e9e6c623295/nihms528541f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43f8/3852744/9cc9b0f5b5c4/nihms528541f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43f8/3852744/6fa53056e324/nihms528541f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43f8/3852744/ccf78a986cab/nihms528541f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43f8/3852744/b02c1fb007f2/nihms528541f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43f8/3852744/4e9e6c623295/nihms528541f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43f8/3852744/9cc9b0f5b5c4/nihms528541f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43f8/3852744/6fa53056e324/nihms528541f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43f8/3852744/ccf78a986cab/nihms528541f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43f8/3852744/b02c1fb007f2/nihms528541f5.jpg

相似文献

1
Social status and the pursuit of positive social identity: Systematic domains of intergroup differentiation and discrimination for high- and low- status groups.社会地位与对积极社会身份的追求:高地位和低地位群体在群体间分化与歧视方面的系统领域。
Group Process Intergroup Relat. 2010 Jul;13(4). doi: 10.1177/1368430209355650.
2
Contentment to resentment: Variation in stereotype content across status systems.满足到怨恨:不同地位体系中刻板印象内容的变化。
Anal Soc Issues Public Policy. 2012 Dec 1;12(1):324-329. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-2415.2011.01277.x.
3
A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition.一个(通常是混合的)刻板印象内容模型:能力和热情分别源于感知到的地位和竞争。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002 Jun;82(6):878-902.
4
Mapping Ethnic Stereotypes and Their Antecedents in Russia: The Stereotype Content Model.描绘俄罗斯的种族刻板印象及其成因:刻板印象内容模型
Front Psychol. 2019 Jul 16;10:1643. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01643. eCollection 2019.
5
"A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition": Correction to Fiske et al. (2002).“(通常是混合的)刻板印象内容模型:能力和热情分别源自感知到的地位和竞争”:对菲斯克等人(2002年)的修正
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2024 Mar;126(3):412. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000163. Epub 2019 Apr 25.
6
The stereotype content model and disabilities.刻板印象内容模型与残疾。
J Soc Psychol. 2023 Jul 4;163(4):480-500. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2021.2017253. Epub 2022 Jan 16.
7
Stereotypes of Social Groups in Mainland China in Terms of Warmth and Competence: Evidence from a Large Undergraduate Sample.中国大陆社会群体的温暖和能力刻板印象:来自一个大型本科生样本的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 30;18(7):3559. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18073559.
8
Warmth and competence stereotypes about immigrant groups in Germany.德国对移民群体的温暖和能力刻板印象。
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 27;14(9):e0223103. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223103. eCollection 2019.
9
The effect of stereotype content on intergroup uncertainty and interactions.刻板印象内容对群体间不确定性及互动的影响。
J Soc Psychol. 2018;158(6):711-720. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2017.1407285. Epub 2018 Jan 8.
10
Self-Stigma Among People With Mental Health Problems in Terms of Warmth and Competence.心理健康问题患者在温暖和能力方面的自我污名化。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 14;13:877491. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.877491. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
"I would do anything but that": Attitudes towards sex work among rural people who use drugs.“我什么都愿意做,就是不愿意干那行”:农村吸毒人群对性工作的态度。
Int J Drug Policy. 2023 Dec;122:104237. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2023.104237. Epub 2023 Oct 20.
2
Looking Competent Does Not Appeal to All Voters Equally: The Role of Social Class and Politicians' Facial Appearance for Voting Likelihood.看起来有能力并非对所有选民都具有同等吸引力:社会阶层和政治家面部特征对投票可能性的影响。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2025 Jan;51(1):66-80. doi: 10.1177/01461672231181465. Epub 2023 Jul 7.
3
Children's Self-Esteem and Attitudes toward Disability, Perceived Competence and Morality: The Indirect Effect of Cognitive Empathy.

本文引用的文献

1
Stereotype content model across cultures: towards universal similarities and some differences.跨文化的刻板印象内容模型:走向普遍的相似性与一些差异。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2009 Mar;48(Pt 1):1-33. doi: 10.1348/014466608X314935.
2
Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models.用于评估和比较多重中介模型中间接效应的渐近和重抽样策略。
Behav Res Methods. 2008 Aug;40(3):879-91. doi: 10.3758/brm.40.3.879.
3
Group virtue: the importance of morality (vs. competence and sociability) in the positive evaluation of in-groups.
儿童的自尊与对残疾的态度、感知能力和道德观念:认知同理心的间接影响
Children (Basel). 2022 Nov 7;9(11):1705. doi: 10.3390/children9111705.
4
The moderating effect of social resources on the link between study-related stressors and depressive symptoms among medical students in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany - a cross-sectional study.德国北莱茵-威斯特法伦州医学生学习相关压力源与抑郁症状之间关系的调节作用:一项横断面研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Aug 2;22(1):524. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-04170-0.
5
'White Child Gone Bankrupt'-The Intersection of Race and Poverty in Youth Fathered by UN Peacekeepers.“白人孩子破产了”-维和人员所生的非裔青年中种族和贫困的交集。
Cult Med Psychiatry. 2022 Sep;46(3):654-678. doi: 10.1007/s11013-022-09772-7. Epub 2022 Mar 18.
6
Personal Value Preferences, Threat-Benefit Appraisal of Immigrants and Levels of Social Contact: Looking Through the Lens of the Stereotype Content Model.个人价值偏好、移民的威胁-利益评估与社会接触水平:透过刻板印象内容模型的视角审视
Front Psychol. 2021 Mar 4;12:609219. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.609219. eCollection 2021.
7
Agency and Communion From the Perspective of Self Versus Others: The Moderating Role of Social Class.自我与他人视角下的能动性与交融性:社会阶层的调节作用
Front Psychol. 2019 Dec 18;10:2867. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02867. eCollection 2019.
8
Does increased interdisciplinary contact among hard and social scientists help or hinder interdisciplinary research?硬科学和社会科学家之间增加的跨学科联系有助于还是阻碍了跨学科研究?
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 4;14(9):e0221907. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221907. eCollection 2019.
9
Forecasting the Primary Dimension of Social Perception: Symbolic and Realistic Threats Together Predict Warmth in the Stereotype Content Model.预测社会认知的主要维度:在刻板印象内容模型中,象征性和现实性威胁共同预测热情程度。
Soc Psychol (Gott). 2015;46(1):36-45. doi: 10.1027/1864-9335/a000219. Epub 2015 Jan 9.
10
Warmth and competence predict overoptimistic beliefs for out-group but not in-group members.温暖和能力预测对外群体成员的过度乐观信念,但不预测内群体成员的过度乐观信念。
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 26;13(11):e0207670. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207670. eCollection 2018.
群体美德:道德(相对于能力和社交性)在对内群体的积极评价中的重要性。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007 Aug;93(2):234-49. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.93.2.234.
4
The confirmability and disconfirmability of trait concepts revisited: does content matter?特质概念的可证实性与可证伪性再探讨:内容重要吗?
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007 Mar;92(3):542-56. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.92.3.542.
5
Universal dimensions of social cognition: warmth and competence.社会认知的普遍维度:热情与能力。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 Feb;11(2):77-83. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.005. Epub 2006 Dec 22.
6
Fundamental dimensions of social judgment: understanding the relations between judgments of competence and warmth.社会判断的基本维度:理解能力判断与热情判断之间的关系。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2005 Dec;89(6):899-913. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.899.
7
When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated.当调节作用被中介时,中介作用被调节时。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2005 Dec;89(6):852-63. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.852.
8
Victim derogation and victim enhancement as alternate routes to system justification.受害者诋毁与受害者美化:通往系统正当性的不同路径
Psychol Sci. 2005 Mar;16(3):240-6. doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.00810.x.
9
Complementary justice: effects of "poor but happy" and "poor but honest" stereotype exemplars on system justification and implicit activation of the justice motive.互补性正义:“穷但快乐”和“穷但诚实”刻板印象范例对系统正当性及正义动机的隐性激活的影响
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Nov;85(5):823-37. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.823.
10
A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition.一个(通常是混合的)刻板印象内容模型:能力和热情分别源于感知到的地位和竞争。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002 Jun;82(6):878-902.