• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

满足到怨恨:不同地位体系中刻板印象内容的变化。

Contentment to resentment: Variation in stereotype content across status systems.

作者信息

Oldmeadow Julian A, Fiske Susan T

机构信息

University of York.

Princeton University.

出版信息

Anal Soc Issues Public Policy. 2012 Dec 1;12(1):324-329. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-2415.2011.01277.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1530-2415.2011.01277.x
PMID:24523628
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3919635/
Abstract

This paper describes an integration of the stereotype content model with social identity theory in which we theorise links between the legitimacy and stability of status relations between groups on the one hand, and stereotypes of warmth and competence on the other. Warmth stereotypes associate with the perceived morality of inequalities, so we reason that high and low status groups are more differentiated in warmth in illegitimate status systems. Also, stereotypes of competence explain status differences, so differences in stereotypical competence may be more pronounced when status is stable rather than unstable. Across two experiments high and low status groups were more sharply differentiated in warmth in illegitimate than legitimate status systems, as predicted. The effect of stability on competence was less clear, as groups were clearly differentiated in competence in all status systems. Implications for the roles of warmth and competence stereotypes in social change are discussed.

摘要

本文描述了刻板印象内容模型与社会认同理论的整合,在这种整合中,我们从理论上阐述了一方面群体间地位关系的合法性与稳定性,另一方面温暖与能力刻板印象之间的联系。温暖刻板印象与不平等的感知道德相关联,因此我们推断,在非法地位体系中,高地位和低地位群体在温暖方面的差异更大。此外,能力刻板印象解释了地位差异,所以当地位稳定而非不稳定时,刻板印象能力的差异可能会更加明显。正如预测的那样,在两项实验中,与合法地位体系相比,非法地位体系中的高地位和低地位群体在温暖方面的差异更为显著。稳定性对能力的影响不太明确,因为在所有地位体系中,群体在能力方面都有明显差异。本文还讨论了温暖和能力刻板印象在社会变革中的作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e05f/3919635/26390963beba/nihms548086f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e05f/3919635/35a9cc11246f/nihms548086f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e05f/3919635/26390963beba/nihms548086f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e05f/3919635/35a9cc11246f/nihms548086f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e05f/3919635/26390963beba/nihms548086f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Contentment to resentment: Variation in stereotype content across status systems.满足到怨恨:不同地位体系中刻板印象内容的变化。
Anal Soc Issues Public Policy. 2012 Dec 1;12(1):324-329. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-2415.2011.01277.x.
2
Stereotype content and morality: How competence and warmth arise from morally significant interactions.刻板印象内容与道德:有意义的道德互动如何产生能力与温暖。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2018 Oct;57(4):834-854. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12262. Epub 2018 Jun 29.
3
Social status and the pursuit of positive social identity: Systematic domains of intergroup differentiation and discrimination for high- and low- status groups.社会地位与对积极社会身份的追求:高地位和低地位群体在群体间分化与歧视方面的系统领域。
Group Process Intergroup Relat. 2010 Jul;13(4). doi: 10.1177/1368430209355650.
4
Mapping Ethnic Stereotypes and Their Antecedents in Russia: The Stereotype Content Model.描绘俄罗斯的种族刻板印象及其成因:刻板印象内容模型
Front Psychol. 2019 Jul 16;10:1643. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01643. eCollection 2019.
5
"A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition": Correction to Fiske et al. (2002).“(通常是混合的)刻板印象内容模型:能力和热情分别源自感知到的地位和竞争”:对菲斯克等人(2002年)的修正
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2024 Mar;126(3):412. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000163. Epub 2019 Apr 25.
6
Warmth and competence stereotypes about immigrant groups in Germany.德国对移民群体的温暖和能力刻板印象。
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 27;14(9):e0223103. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223103. eCollection 2019.
7
A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition.一个(通常是混合的)刻板印象内容模型:能力和热情分别源于感知到的地位和竞争。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002 Jun;82(6):878-902.
8
Stereotypes of Women and Men Across Gender Subgroups.跨性别亚群体中对男性和女性的刻板印象。
Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 28;13:881418. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.881418. eCollection 2022.
9
Stereotypes of Social Groups in Mainland China in Terms of Warmth and Competence: Evidence from a Large Undergraduate Sample.中国大陆社会群体的温暖和能力刻板印象:来自一个大型本科生样本的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 30;18(7):3559. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18073559.
10
The stereotype content model and disabilities.刻板印象内容模型与残疾。
J Soc Psychol. 2023 Jul 4;163(4):480-500. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2021.2017253. Epub 2022 Jan 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Forecasting the Primary Dimension of Social Perception: Symbolic and Realistic Threats Together Predict Warmth in the Stereotype Content Model.预测社会认知的主要维度:在刻板印象内容模型中,象征性和现实性威胁共同预测热情程度。
Soc Psychol (Gott). 2015;46(1):36-45. doi: 10.1027/1864-9335/a000219. Epub 2015 Jan 9.
2
Signs of Social Class: The Experience of Economic Inequality in Everyday Life.社会阶层的标志:日常生活中经济不平等的体验。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2017 May;12(3):422-435. doi: 10.1177/1745691616673192.
3
Intergroup Biases: A Focus on Stereotype Content.

本文引用的文献

1
Social status and the pursuit of positive social identity: Systematic domains of intergroup differentiation and discrimination for high- and low- status groups.社会地位与对积极社会身份的追求:高地位和低地位群体在群体间分化与歧视方面的系统领域。
Group Process Intergroup Relat. 2010 Jul;13(4). doi: 10.1177/1368430209355650.
2
Nations' income inequality predicts ambivalence in stereotype content: how societies mind the gap.国家的收入不平等预测了刻板印象内容的矛盾态度:社会如何关注差距。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2013 Dec;52(4):726-46. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12005. Epub 2012 Oct 5.
3
The BIAS map: behaviors from intergroup affect and stereotypes.
群体间偏见:对刻板印象内容的关注。
Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2015 Jun;3:45-50. doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2015.01.010.
4
Nations' income inequality predicts ambivalence in stereotype content: how societies mind the gap.国家的收入不平等预测了刻板印象内容的矛盾态度:社会如何关注差距。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2013 Dec;52(4):726-46. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12005. Epub 2012 Oct 5.
偏差地图:群体间情感与刻板印象产生的行为
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007 Apr;92(4):631-48. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.92.4.631.
4
Universal dimensions of social cognition: warmth and competence.社会认知的普遍维度:热情与能力。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 Feb;11(2):77-83. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.005. Epub 2006 Dec 22.
5
Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimation.关于合法性与合法化的心理学视角。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2006;57:375-400. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190038.
6
Exposure to benevolent sexism and complementary gender stereotypes: consequences for specific and diffuse forms of system justification.接触善意的性别歧视和互补性的性别刻板印象:对特定和普遍形式的系统正当化的影响。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2005 Mar;88(3):498-509. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.88.3.498.
7
A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition.一个(通常是混合的)刻板印象内容模型:能力和热情分别源于感知到的地位和竞争。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002 Jun;82(6):878-902.
8
Status differences and in-group bias: a meta-analytic examination of the effects of status stability, status legitimacy, and group permeability.地位差异与内群体偏见:对地位稳定性、地位合法性和群体渗透性影响的元分析考察
Psychol Bull. 2001 Jul;127(4):520-42. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.127.4.520.