Suppr超能文献

经济和政治因素对烟草税率的影响:基于全国 31 年州级数据的分析。

Economic and political influence on tobacco tax rates: a nationwide analysis of 31 years of state data.

机构信息

At the time of the study, Shelley D. Golden and Krista M. Perreira were with the Department of Public Policy, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC. Kurt M. Ribisl is with Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 2014 Feb;104(2):350-7. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301537. Epub 2013 Dec 12.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated state-level characteristics associated with cigarette excise taxes before and after the Master Settlement Agreement (MSA).

METHODS

We gathered annual cigarette excise tax rates for all US states and the District of Columbia, between 1981 and 2011, and matched each state-year tax rate with economic, political, attitudinal, and demographic characteristics, creating a data set of 1581 observations. We used panel data regression techniques to assess relationships between key characteristics and state cigarette excise tax levels.

RESULTS

Cigarette excise tax rates grew at more than 6 times the rate of inflation between 1981 and 2011; growth varied by time period and region. We found strong negative associations between Republican Party control of state legislatures and governors' offices and state cigarette tax rates. Tobacco production, citizens' attitudes toward taxes and tobacco control, and cigarette tax rates in neighboring states were significantly associated with cigarette tax rates. We found no association between unemployment and tax rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Future excise tax growth rate may depend more on the political leanings of state legislators, and the attitudes of the people they represent, than on economic circumstances.

摘要

目的

我们评估了《大和解协议》(MSA)前后各州与香烟消费税相关的特点。

方法

我们收集了 1981 年至 2011 年间美国所有州和哥伦比亚特区的年度香烟消费税税率,并将每个州-年的税率与经济、政治、态度和人口统计学特征相匹配,创建了一个包含 1581 个观测值的数据集。我们使用面板数据分析技术评估了关键特征与州香烟消费税水平之间的关系。

结果

1981 年至 2011 年间,香烟消费税税率的增长速度超过了通货膨胀率的 6 倍;增长率因时间和地区而异。我们发现,共和党控制州立法机构和州长办公室与州香烟税税率之间存在强烈的负相关关系。烟草生产、公民对税收和烟草控制的态度以及邻近州的香烟税率与香烟税率显著相关。我们没有发现失业率与税率之间的关联。

结论

未来消费税的增长率可能更多地取决于州立法机构议员的政治倾向,以及他们所代表的民众的态度,而不是经济环境。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

2
From convergence to divergence: Lifespan variation in US states, 1959-2017.从趋同到分化:1959 - 2017年美国各州的寿命差异
SSM Popul Health. 2021 Dec 4;16:100987. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100987. eCollection 2021 Dec.
8
The politics hypothesis and racial disparities in infants' health in the United States.美国婴儿健康方面的政治假说与种族差异
SSM Popul Health. 2019 Jul 6;8:100440. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2019.100440. eCollection 2019 Aug.
10
Neighbourhood disparities in the price of the cheapest cigarettes in the USA.美国最便宜香烟价格的邻里差异。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2019 Sep;73(9):894-896. doi: 10.1136/jech-2018-210998. Epub 2019 May 23.

本文引用的文献

3
Effectiveness of tax and price policies in tobacco control.烟草控制中的税收和价格政策的有效性。
Tob Control. 2011 May;20(3):235-8. doi: 10.1136/tc.2010.039982. Epub 2010 Nov 29.
4
Driven to drink: Sin taxes near a border.为酒所驱:边境附近的罪恶税。
J Health Econ. 2009 Dec;28(6):1175-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2009.08.002. Epub 2009 Aug 26.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验