• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

BacT/alert FA plus和FN plus血培养培养基与BacT/alert FA和FN血培养培养基的对照临床比较。

Controlled clinical comparison of BacT/alert FA plus and FN plus blood culture media with BacT/alert FA and FN blood culture media.

作者信息

Kirn T J, Mirrett S, Reller L B, Weinstein M P

机构信息

Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 2014 Mar;52(3):839-43. doi: 10.1128/JCM.03063-13. Epub 2013 Dec 26.

DOI:10.1128/JCM.03063-13
PMID:24371240
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3957782/
Abstract

New blood culture media containing antibiotic-binding polymeric beads have been developed for the BacT/Alert (bioMérieux, Inc., Durham, NC) blood culture system. To assess the performance of these new media, we compared the new BacT/Alert aerobic medium (FA Plus) with resins to BacT/Alert FA medium with activated charcoal and the new BacT/Alert anaerobic medium (FN Plus) to BacT/Alert FN medium at 3 tertiary care medical centers. Study bottle pairs were inoculated with a target volume of 6 to 10 ml of blood from adults and incubated in the BacT/Alert 3D blood culture instrument. In the FA Plus versus FA comparison, there were 1,507 study pairs. Among 170 isolates causing true bloodstream infections (BSIs), significantly more Staphylococcus aureus (P<0.001) and total microorganisms (P<0.01) grew in the FA Plus bottle than in the FA bottle. Fewer coagulase-negative staphylococcal (CoNS) contaminants grew in the FA Plus bottle than in the FA bottle (10 versus 22; P=0.05). In addition, growth was detected earlier in the FA Plus bottle than in the FA bottle (P<0.001). In the FN Plus versus FN comparison, there were 2,386 study pairs. Among 201 isolates causing true BSIs, significantly more S. aureus (P<0.001), CoNS (P<0.005), and total microorganisms (P<0.001) grew in the FN Plus bottle than in the FN bottle. Also, significantly more CoNS contaminants grew in the FN Plus bottle than in the FN bottle (P<0.001). Overall, microorganisms were detected earlier in the FN Plus than in the FN bottle (P<0.001). Medical technologists at all 3 study sites preferred the new media for Gram stain interpretation. We conclude that the FA Plus and FN Plus media provide improved and earlier detection of microorganisms compared with the FA and FN media and are preferable for Gram stain interpretation as well.

摘要

已开发出含抗生素结合聚合物微珠的新型血培养培养基,用于BacT/Alert(生物梅里埃公司,北卡罗来纳州达勒姆)血培养系统。为评估这些新型培养基的性能,我们在3家三级医疗中心将含树脂的新型BacT/Alert需氧培养基(FA Plus)与含活性炭的BacT/Alert FA培养基,以及新型BacT/Alert厌氧培养基(FN Plus)与BacT/Alert FN培养基进行了比较。研究瓶对接种来自成人的6至10毫升目标血量,在BacT/Alert 3D血培养仪中孵育。在FA Plus与FA的比较中,有1507对研究瓶对。在170株导致真正血流感染(BSI)的分离株中,FA Plus瓶中生长的金黄色葡萄球菌(P<0.001)和总微生物(P<0.01)显著多于FA瓶。FA Plus瓶中生长的凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌(CoNS)污染物少于FA瓶(分别为10株和22株;P=0.05)。此外,FA Plus瓶中比FA瓶更早检测到生长(P<0.001)。在FN Plus与FN的比较中,有2386对研究瓶对。在201株导致真正BSI的分离株中,FN Plus瓶中生长的金黄色葡萄球菌(P<0.001)、CoNS(P<0.005)和总微生物(P<0.001)显著多于FN瓶。同样,FN Plus瓶中生长的CoNS污染物也显著多于FN瓶(P<0.001)。总体而言,FN Plus中比FN瓶更早检测到微生物(P<0.001)。所有3个研究地点的医学技术人员在革兰氏染色判读方面更倾向于新型培养基。我们得出结论,与FA和FN培养基相比,FA Plus和FN Plus培养基能更好且更早地检测到微生物,并且在革兰氏染色判读方面也更优。

相似文献

1
Controlled clinical comparison of BacT/alert FA plus and FN plus blood culture media with BacT/alert FA and FN blood culture media.BacT/alert FA plus和FN plus血培养培养基与BacT/alert FA和FN血培养培养基的对照临床比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 2014 Mar;52(3):839-43. doi: 10.1128/JCM.03063-13. Epub 2013 Dec 26.
2
Controlled clinical comparison of the BacT/ALERT FN and the standard anaerobic SN blood culture medium.BacT/ALERT FN与标准厌氧SN血培养培养基的对照临床比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 2004 Oct;42(10):4581-5. doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.10.4581-4585.2004.
3
Performance of two resin-containing blood culture media in detection of bloodstream infections and in direct matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) broth assays for isolate identification: clinical comparison of the BacT/Alert Plus and Bactec Plus systems.两种含树脂血培养培养基在检测血流感染及直接基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间质谱(MALDI-TOF MS)肉汤检测法用于分离株鉴定中的性能:BacT/Alert Plus和Bactec Plus系统的临床比较
J Clin Microbiol. 2014 Oct;52(10):3558-67. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01171-14. Epub 2014 Jul 16.
4
A comparative evaluation of BACT/ALERT FA PLUS and FN PLUS blood culture bottles and BD BACTEC Plus Aerobic and Anaerobic blood culture bottles for antimicrobial neutralization.BACT/ALERT FA PLUS 和 FN PLUS 血培养瓶与 BD BACTEC Plus 需氧和厌氧血培养瓶对抗菌药物中和作用的比较评估。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2019 Dec;38(12):2229-2233. doi: 10.1007/s10096-019-03663-3. Epub 2019 Aug 2.
5
Controlled comparison of the BacT/Alert and BACTEC 660/730 nonradiometric blood culture systems.BacT/Alert与BACTEC 660/730非放射性血培养系统的对照比较
J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Feb;30(2):323-9. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.2.323-329.1992.
6
Performance of BacT/Alert resin-based FN plus bottles compared with BacT/Alert charcoal-based FN bottles for the detection of anaerobes in experimentally seeded blood cultures.将基于树脂的BacT/Alert FN加样瓶与基于活性炭的BacT/Alert FN瓶在实验接种血培养物中检测厌氧菌的性能进行比较。
Anaerobe. 2015 Oct;35(Pt B):92-5. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2015.07.010. Epub 2015 Aug 5.
7
Controlled comparison of original vented aerobic fan medium with new nonvented BacT/ALERT FA medium for culturing blood.用于血液培养的原装透气需氧扇形培养基与新型非透气BacT/ALERT FA培养基的对照比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 2001 Jun;39(6):2098-101. doi: 10.1128/JCM.39.6.2098-2101.2001.
8
Comparison of BACTEC PLUS blood culture media to BacT/Alert FA blood culture media for detection of bacterial pathogens in samples containing therapeutic levels of antibiotics.比较BACTEC PLUS血培养培养基与BacT/Alert FA血培养培养基在含有治疗水平抗生素的样本中检测细菌病原体的能力。
J Clin Microbiol. 2007 Mar;45(3):816-21. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02064-06. Epub 2006 Dec 13.
9
Comparison and evaluation of neutralization of clinically frequently used antimicrobial agents using three different culture media in simulated blood cultures.比较和评价三种不同培养基在模拟血培养中对临床常用抗菌药物的中和作用。
Microbiol Spectr. 2024 Oct 3;12(10):e0097924. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00979-24. Epub 2024 Aug 27.
10
Clinical evaluation of BacT/Alert FA plus and FN plus bottles compared with standard bottles.与标准瓶相比,BacT/Alert FA plus瓶和FN plus瓶的临床评估
J Clin Microbiol. 2013 Dec;51(12):4150-5. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01935-13. Epub 2013 Oct 9.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of optimizing microbial diagnosis processes on clinical and healthcare economic outcomes in hospitalized patients with bloodstream infections.优化微生物诊断流程对住院血流感染患者的临床和医疗经济结局的影响。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2024 Nov;43(11):2147-2157. doi: 10.1007/s10096-024-04928-2. Epub 2024 Sep 6.
2
Comparison and evaluation of neutralization of clinically frequently used antimicrobial agents using three different culture media in simulated blood cultures.比较和评价三种不同培养基在模拟血培养中对临床常用抗菌药物的中和作用。
Microbiol Spectr. 2024 Oct 3;12(10):e0097924. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00979-24. Epub 2024 Aug 27.
3
Real-World Evaluation of the Impact of Implementation of the Virtuo Blood Culture System in a Tertiary Care Hospital.真实世界评估三级医院实施 Virtuo 血培养系统的影响。
J Clin Microbiol. 2021 Sep 20;59(10):e0061721. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00617-21. Epub 2021 Jul 14.
4
Implementation of Automated Blood Culture With Quality Assurance in a Resource-Limited Setting.在资源有限的环境中实施具有质量保证的自动化血培养
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 May 21;8:627513. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.627513. eCollection 2021.
5
Impact of 24/7 loading of blood culture bottles in a new automated incubator on the diagnosis of bloodstream infections.新型自动培养箱中血培养瓶24/7连续加载对血流感染诊断的影响
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2021 Dec;40(12):2639-2643. doi: 10.1007/s10096-021-04283-6. Epub 2021 Jun 1.
6
Comparison of Microorganism Detection and Time to Positivity in Pediatric and Standard Media from Three Major Commercial Continuously Monitored Blood Culture Systems.三种主要商业连续监测血培养系统中儿科与标准培养基的微生物检测和阳性时间比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 2021 Jun 18;59(7):e0042921. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00429-21.
7
Seasonal variations in blood culture numbers and time to positivity and potential impact of reducing incubation periods.血培养数量和阳性时间的季节性变化,以及缩短孵育期的潜在影响。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2021 Oct;40(10):2087-2093. doi: 10.1007/s10096-021-04248-9. Epub 2021 Apr 23.
8
Infected aortic aneurysm caused by Helicobacter cinaedi: case series and systematic review of the literature.感染性腹主动脉瘤由弯曲杆菌引起:病例系列和文献系统评价。
BMC Infect Dis. 2020 Nov 17;20(1):854. doi: 10.1186/s12879-020-05582-7.
9
Clinical characteristics of bloodstream infection by Parvimonas micra: retrospective case series and literature review.微小消化链球菌血流感染的临床特征:回顾性病例系列和文献复习。
BMC Infect Dis. 2020 Aug 5;20(1):578. doi: 10.1186/s12879-020-05305-y.
10
Comparison of Rapid and Routine Methods of Identification and Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing of Microorganisms from Blood Culture Bottles.快速与常规方法鉴定血培养瓶中微生物及药敏试验的比较。
Pol J Microbiol. 2020;69(2):1-12. doi: 10.33073/pjm-2020-019.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of 2 blood culture media shows significant differences in bacterial recovery for patients on antimicrobial therapy.两种血培养介质的比较显示,在接受抗菌治疗的患者中,细菌回收率有显著差异。
Clin Infect Dis. 2013 Mar;56(6):790-7. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis1021. Epub 2012 Dec 7.
2
Comparison of BACTEC PLUS blood culture media to BacT/Alert FA blood culture media for detection of bacterial pathogens in samples containing therapeutic levels of antibiotics.比较BACTEC PLUS血培养培养基与BacT/Alert FA血培养培养基在含有治疗水平抗生素的样本中检测细菌病原体的能力。
J Clin Microbiol. 2007 Mar;45(3):816-21. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02064-06. Epub 2006 Dec 13.
3
Use of simulated blood cultures for antibiotic effect on time to detection of the two blood culture systems BacT/ALERT and BACTEC 9240.使用模拟血培养评估两种血培养系统BacT/ALERT和BACTEC 9240检测时间对抗生素效果的影响。
New Microbiol. 2004 Jul;27(3):235-48.
4
Controlled clinical laboratory comparison of two supplemented aerobic and anaerobic media used in automated blood culture systems to detect bloodstream infections.用于自动血培养系统检测血流感染的两种补充需氧和厌氧培养基的对照临床实验室比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 1998 Mar;36(3):657-61. doi: 10.1128/JCM.36.3.657-661.1998.
5
Controlled clinical laboratory comparison of BACTEC plus aerobic/F resin medium with BacT/Alert aerobic FAN medium for detection of bacteremia and fungemia.BACTEC plus需氧/F树脂培养基与BacT/Alert需氧FAN培养基用于检测菌血症和真菌血症的对照临床实验室比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 1997 Jan;35(1):53-8. doi: 10.1128/jcm.35.1.53-58.1997.
6
Controlled clinical evaluation of BACTEC Plus Aerobic/F and BacT/Alert Aerobic FAN bottles for detection of bloodstream infections.BACTEC Plus需氧/F瓶和BacT/Alert需氧FAN瓶用于检测血流感染的对照临床评估。
J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Nov;33(11):2856-8. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.11.2856-2858.1995.
7
Controlled evaluation of BacT/Alert standard aerobic and FAN aerobic blood culture bottles for detection of bacteremia and fungemia.BacT/Alert标准需氧培养瓶与FAN需氧血培养瓶检测菌血症和真菌血症的对照评估
J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Apr;33(4):978-81. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.4.978-981.1995.
8
Controlled evaluation of BacT/alert standard anaerobic and FAN anaerobic blood culture bottles for the detection of bacteremia and fungemia.BacT/alert标准厌氧血培养瓶和FAN厌氧血培养瓶用于检测菌血症和真菌血症的对照评估。
J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Sep;33(9):2265-70. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.9.2265-2270.1995.
9
The clinical significance of positive blood cultures: a comprehensive analysis of 500 episodes of bacteremia and fungemia in adults. I. Laboratory and epidemiologic observations.血培养阳性的临床意义:对500例成人菌血症和真菌血症病例的综合分析。I. 实验室及流行病学观察
Rev Infect Dis. 1983 Jan-Feb;5(1):35-53. doi: 10.1093/clinids/5.1.35.
10
Controlled evaluation of BACTEC Plus 26 and Roche Septi-Chek aerobic blood culture bottles.BACTEC Plus 26和罗氏Septi-Chek需氧血培养瓶的对照评估
J Clin Microbiol. 1991 May;29(5):879-82. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.5.879-882.1991.