Fiori Barbara, D'Inzeo Tiziana, Di Florio Viviana, De Maio Flavio, De Angelis Giulia, Giaquinto Alessia, Campana Lara, Tanzarella Eloisa, Tumbarello Mario, Antonelli Massimo, Sanguinetti Maurizio, Spanu Teresa
Institute of Microbiology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Gemelli Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Institute of Infectious Diseases, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Gemelli Hospital, Rome, Italy.
J Clin Microbiol. 2014 Oct;52(10):3558-67. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01171-14. Epub 2014 Jul 16.
We compared the clinical performances of the BacT/Alert Plus (bioMérieux) and Bactec Plus (Becton Dickinson) aerobic and anaerobic blood culture (BC) media with adsorbent polymeric beads. Patients ≥ 16 years old with suspected bloodstream infections (BSIs) were enrolled in intensive care units and infectious disease wards. A single 40-ml blood sample was collected from each and used to inoculate (10 ml/bottle) one set of BacT/Alert Plus cultures and one set of Bactec Plus cultures, each set consisting of one aerobic and one anaerobic bottle. Cultures were incubated ≤ 5 days in the BacT/Alert 3D and Bactec FX instruments, respectively. A total of 128 unique BSI episodes were identified based on the recovery of clinically significant growth in 212 aerobic cultures (106 BacT/Alert and 106 Bactec) and 151 anaerobic cultures (82 BacT/Alert and 69 Bactec). The BacT/Alert aerobic medium had higher recovery rates for Gram-positive cocci (P = 0.024), whereas the Bactec aerobic medium was superior for recovery of Gram-negative bacilli (P = 0.006). BacT/Alert anaerobic medium recovery rates exceeded those of the Bactec anaerobic medium for total organisms (P = 0.003), Gram-positive cocci (P = 0.013), and Escherichia coli (P = 0.030). In terms of capacity for diagnosing the 128 septic episodes, the BacT/Alert and Bactec sets were comparable, although the former sets diagnosed more BSIs caused by Gram-positive cocci (P = 0.008). They also allowed earlier identification of coagulase-negative staphylococcal growth (mean, 2.8 h; P = 0.003) and growth in samples from patients not on antimicrobial therapy that yielded positive results (mean, 1.3 h; P < 0.001). Similarly high percentages of microorganisms in BacT/Alert and Bactec cultures (93.8% and 93.3%, respectively) were identified by direct matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry assay of BC broths. The BacT/Alert Plus media line appears to be a reliable, timesaving tool for routine detection of BSIs in the population we studied, although further studies are needed to evaluate their performance in other settings.
我们比较了BacT/Alert Plus(生物梅里埃公司)和Bactec Plus(贝克顿·迪金森公司)含吸附性聚合物微球的需氧和厌氧血培养(BC)培养基的临床性能。年龄≥16岁且疑似血流感染(BSI)的患者被纳入重症监护病房和传染病病房。从每位患者采集一份40毫升的血样,并用于接种(每瓶10毫升)一组BacT/Alert Plus培养瓶和一组Bactec Plus培养瓶,每组包括一个需氧瓶和一个厌氧瓶。培养瓶分别在BacT/Alert 3D和Bactec FX仪器中孵育≤5天。基于212份需氧培养物(106份BacT/Alert培养物和106份Bactec培养物)和151份厌氧培养物(82份BacT/Alert培养物和69份Bactec培养物)中临床显著生长的恢复情况,共识别出128例独特的BSI发作。BacT/Alert需氧培养基对革兰氏阳性球菌的回收率更高(P = 0.024),而Bactec需氧培养基在革兰氏阴性杆菌的回收方面更具优势(P = 0.006)。BacT/Alert厌氧培养基在总微生物(P = 0.003)、革兰氏阳性球菌(P = 0.013)和大肠杆菌(P = 0.030)的回收率方面超过了Bactec厌氧培养基。就诊断这128例脓毒症发作的能力而言,BacT/Alert和Bactec培养瓶组相当,尽管前者诊断出更多由革兰氏阳性球菌引起的BSI(P = 0.008)。它们还能更早地识别凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌的生长(平均2.8小时;P = 0.003)以及未接受抗菌治疗患者样本中产生阳性结果的生长(平均1.3小时;P < 0.001)。通过对BC肉汤进行直接基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间质谱分析,BacT/Alert和Bactec培养物中微生物的百分比同样很高(分别为93.8%和93.3%)。BacT/Alert Plus培养基系列似乎是我们研究人群中常规检测BSI的可靠且节省时间的工具,尽管还需要进一步研究来评估它们在其他环境中的性能。