Department of Biogeochemistry, Max Planck Institute for Terrestrial Microbiology, Marburg, Germany ; LOEWE Center for Synthetic Microbiology, SYNMIKRO, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Department of Biogeochemistry, Max Planck Institute for Terrestrial Microbiology, Marburg, Germany ; LOEWE Center for Synthetic Microbiology, SYNMIKRO, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany ; School of Molecular Bioscience, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 15;9(1):e85861. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085861. eCollection 2014.
Although blattid cockroaches and termites share a common ancestor, their diets are distinctly different. While termites consume a highly specialized diet of lignocellulose, cockroaches are omnivorous and opportunistic feeders. The role of the termite gut microbiota has been studied intensively, but little is known about the cockroach gut microbiota and its function in digestion and nutrition, particularly the adaptation to different diets. Our analyses of the bacterial gut microbiota of the blattid cockroach Shelfordella lateralis combining terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism of their 16S rRNA genes with physiological parameters (microbial metabolites, hydrogen and methane emission) indicated substantial variation between individuals but failed to identify any diet-related response. Subsequent deep-sequencing of the 16S rRNA genes of the colonic gut microbiota of S. lateralis fed either a high- or a low-fiber diet confirmed the absence of bacterial taxa that responded to diet. Instead, we found a small number of abundant phylotypes that were consistently present in all samples and made up half of the community in both diet groups. They varied strongly in abundance between individual samples at the genus but not at the family level. The remaining phylotypes were inconsistently present among replicate batches. Our findings suggest that S. lateralis harbors a highly dynamic core gut microbiota that is maintained even after fundamental dietary shifts, and that any dietary effects on the gut community are likely to be masked by strong individual variations.
虽然蜚蠊和白蚁拥有共同的祖先,但它们的饮食明显不同。白蚁以高度特化的木质纤维素为食,而蟑螂则是杂食性和机会性的觅食者。白蚁肠道微生物群的作用已经得到了深入研究,但对于蟑螂肠道微生物群及其在消化和营养中的功能,特别是对不同饮食的适应,知之甚少。我们结合 16S rRNA 基因末端限制性片段长度多态性和生理参数(微生物代谢物、氢气和甲烷排放)分析了蜚蠊 Shelfordella lateralis 的细菌肠道微生物群,结果表明个体之间存在很大差异,但未能确定任何与饮食相关的反应。随后,对 S. lateralis 饲喂高纤维或低纤维饮食的结肠肠道微生物群的 16S rRNA 基因进行深度测序,证实不存在对饮食有反应的细菌分类群。相反,我们发现了少数数量丰富的菌型,它们在所有样本中都始终存在,在两个饮食组中占群落的一半。它们在属水平上的丰度在个体样本之间差异很大,但在科水平上没有差异。其余的菌型在重复批次中存在不一致。我们的研究结果表明,S. lateralis 拥有高度动态的核心肠道微生物群,即使在基本饮食转变后也能维持,而且任何对肠道群落的饮食影响都可能被强烈的个体差异所掩盖。