Starns Jeffrey J, Ratcliff Roger
University of Massachusetts Amherst.
Ohio State University.
J Mem Lang. 2014 Jan;70:36-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2013.09.005.
Recognition memory z-transformed Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) functions have a slope less than 1. One way to accommodate this finding is to assume that memory evidence is more variable for studied (old) items than non-studied (new) items. This assumption has been implemented in signal detection models, but this approach cannot accommodate the time course of decision making. We tested the unequal-variance assumption by fitting the diffusion model to accuracy and response time (RT) distributions from nine old/new recognition data sets comprising previously-published data from 376 participants. The η parameter in the diffusion model measures between-trial variability in evidence based on accuracy and the RT distributions for correct and error responses. In fits to nine data sets, η estimates were higher for targets than lures in all cases, and fitting results rejected an equal-variance version of the model in favor of an unequal-variance version. Parameter recovery simulations showed that the variability differences were not produced by biased estimation of the η parameter. Estimates of the other model parameters were largely consistent between the equal- and unequal-variance versions of the model. Our results provide independent support for the unequal-variance assumption without using ROC data.
识别记忆的z变换后的接收者操作特征(ROC)函数的斜率小于1。适应这一发现的一种方法是假设,对于已学习(旧)项目的记忆证据比未学习(新)项目的更具变异性。这一假设已在信号检测模型中得到应用,但这种方法无法适应决策的时间进程。我们通过将扩散模型拟合到九个旧/新识别数据集的准确性和反应时间(RT)分布来测试不等方差假设,这些数据集包含了之前发表的来自376名参与者的数据。扩散模型中的η参数基于准确性以及正确和错误反应的RT分布来测量试验间证据的变异性。在对九个数据集的拟合中,所有情况下目标的η估计值都高于诱饵,并且拟合结果拒绝了模型的等方差版本,而支持不等方差版本。参数恢复模拟表明,变异性差异不是由η参数的偏差估计产生的。模型的等方差和不等方差版本之间,其他模型参数的估计在很大程度上是一致的。我们的结果在不使用ROC数据的情况下,为不等方差假设提供了独立支持。