Naval Medical Research Center, NMRC-Frederick, 8400 Research Plaza, Fort Detrick, Frederick, MD 21702, USA.
BMC Genomics. 2014 Feb 4;15:96. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-96.
The introduction of benchtop sequencers has made adoption of whole genome sequencing possible for a broader community of researchers than ever before. Concurrently, metagenomic sequencing (MGS) is rapidly emerging as a tool for interrogating complex samples that defy conventional analyses. In addition, next-generation sequencers are increasingly being used in clinical or related settings, for instance to track outbreaks. However, information regarding the analytical sensitivity or limit of detection (LoD) of benchtop sequencers is currently lacking. Furthermore, the specificity of sequence information at or near the LoD is unknown.
In the present study, we assess the ability of three next-generation sequencing platforms to identify a pathogen (viral or bacterial) present in low titers in a clinically relevant sample (blood). Our results indicate that the Roche-454 Titanium platform is capable of detecting Dengue virus at titers as low as 1X102.5 pfu/mL, corresponding to an estimated 5.4X104 genome copies/ml maximum. The increased throughput of the benchtop sequencers, the Ion Torrent PGM and Illumina MiSeq platforms, enabled detection of viral genomes at concentrations as low as 1X104 genome copies/mL. Platform-specific biases were evident in sequence read distributions as well as viral genome coverage. For bacterial samples, only the MiSeq platform was able to provide sequencing reads that could be unambiguously classified as originating from Bacillus anthracis.
The analytical sensitivity of all three platforms approaches that of standard qPCR assays. Although all platforms were able to detect pathogens at the levels tested, there were several noteworthy differences. The Roche-454 Titanium platform produced consistently longer reads, even when compared with the latest chemistry updates for the PGM platform. The MiSeq platform produced consistently greater depth and breadth of coverage, while the Ion Torrent was unequaled for speed of sequencing. None of the platforms were able to verify a single nucleotide polymorphism responsible for antiviral resistance in an Influenza A strain isolated from the 2009 H1N1 pandemic. Overall, the benchtop platforms perform well for identification of pathogens from a representative clinical sample. However, unlike identification, characterization of pathogens is likely to require higher titers, multiple libraries and/or multiple sequencing runs.
台式测序仪的出现使比以往任何时候都更广泛的研究人员群体能够采用全基因组测序。同时,宏基因组测序(MGS)正在迅速成为一种工具,用于检测复杂的样本,这些样本无法进行常规分析。此外,下一代测序仪越来越多地用于临床或相关环境中,例如跟踪疫情爆发。然而,目前缺乏有关台式测序仪分析灵敏度或检测限(LoD)的信息。此外,接近 LoD 时序列信息的特异性尚不清楚。
在本研究中,我们评估了三种下一代测序平台识别临床相关样本(血液)中低滴度病原体(病毒或细菌)的能力。我们的结果表明,罗氏 454 钛平台能够检测到低至 1X102.5 pfu/mL 的登革热病毒滴度,相当于估计的 5.4X104 基因组拷贝/ml 最大值。台式测序仪的高通量,即 Ion Torrent PGM 和 Illumina MiSeq 平台,能够检测到低至 1X104 基因组拷贝/mL 的病毒基因组。在序列读取分布和病毒基因组覆盖方面,存在平台特异性的偏差。对于细菌样本,只有 MiSeq 平台能够提供可明确归类为炭疽芽孢杆菌来源的测序读取。
所有三个平台的分析灵敏度均接近标准 qPCR 检测。尽管所有平台都能够在测试水平上检测到病原体,但存在一些值得注意的差异。罗氏 454 钛平台即使与 PGM 平台的最新化学更新相比,也能产生一致更长的读取。MiSeq 平台产生了一致更大的深度和广度的覆盖,而 Ion Torrent 则在测序速度方面无与伦比。没有一个平台能够验证从 2009 年 H1N1 大流行中分离的流感 A 株中抗病毒耐药性的单一核苷酸多态性。总体而言,台式平台在从代表性临床样本中识别病原体方面表现良好。然而,与鉴定不同,病原体的特征分析可能需要更高的滴度、多个文库和/或多个测序运行。