Suppr超能文献

二氧化碳激光与吻合器辅助内镜 Zenker 憩室切开术的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Carbon dioxide laser versus stapler-assisted endoscopic Zenker's diverticulotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Minnesota Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.

出版信息

Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014 May;150(5):750-3. doi: 10.1177/0194599814521554. Epub 2014 Feb 4.

Abstract

To evaluate outcomes following endoscopic management of Zenker's diverticula using a carbon dioxide laser (CO2) or stapler-assisted technique, a systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted. Seven retrospective, uncontrolled case series including 391 procedures met selection criteria. No higher quality studies were identified. Outcomes favoring the stapler technique included a shorter duration of nil per os (NPO) status (2 studies), length of hospitalization (LOH, 2 studies), and fewer postoperative fevers and abnormal chest x-rays (1 study). Outcomes favoring the CO2 technique included greater improvement in postoperative dysphagia and regurgitation scores (2 studies) and a lower revision rate (1 study). Meta-analysis demonstrated increased nondental complications in the CO2 group (odds ratio 3.81; 95% confidence interval, 1.37-10.59; P = .01) but no difference in duration of NPO (P = .06), LOH (P = .07), overall complications (P = .08), dental complications (P = .57), major complications (P = .38), or revision surgery (P = .82). Implications are limited by the quality of studies identified.

摘要

为了评估使用二氧化碳(CO2)激光或吻合器辅助技术对内窥镜治疗Zenker 憩室的结果,进行了系统评价和荟萃分析。符合选择标准的有 7 项回顾性、非对照病例系列研究,共涉及 391 例手术。未发现更高质量的研究。支持吻合器技术的结果包括禁食(NPO)时间(2 项研究)、住院时间(LOH,2 项研究)和术后发热和异常胸片的发生率(1 项研究)较短。支持 CO2 技术的结果包括术后吞咽困难和反流评分的改善程度更高(2 项研究)和较低的翻修率(1 项研究)。荟萃分析表明 CO2 组的非牙科并发症发生率增加(比值比 3.81;95%置信区间,1.37-10.59;P =.01),但 NPO 持续时间(P =.06)、LOH(P =.07)、总并发症(P =.08)、牙科并发症(P =.57)、主要并发症(P =.38)或翻修手术(P =.82)无差异。研究的质量限制了结论的推广。

相似文献

1
Carbon dioxide laser versus stapler-assisted endoscopic Zenker's diverticulotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014 May;150(5):750-3. doi: 10.1177/0194599814521554. Epub 2014 Feb 4.
2
Endoscopic stapler versus laser diverticulotomy for Zenker's diverticulum: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
J Laryngol Otol. 2023 Jul;137(7):718-724. doi: 10.1017/S0022215122002377. Epub 2022 Nov 16.
3
Revision Zenker diverticulum: laser versus stapler outcomes following initial endoscopic failure.
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2013 Apr;122(4):247-53. doi: 10.1177/000348941312200406.
5
Does residual wall size or technique matter in the treatment of Zenker's diverticulum?
Laryngoscope. 2016 Nov;126(11):2475-2479. doi: 10.1002/lary.25975. Epub 2016 Mar 24.
6
Laser versus stapler: outcomes in endoscopic repair of Zenker diverticulum.
Laryngoscope. 2012 Sep;122(9):1961-6. doi: 10.1002/lary.23398. Epub 2012 Jul 2.
8
Revision endoscopic stapler Zenker's diverticulotomy.
Surg Endosc. 2016 May;30(5):2022-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4435-z. Epub 2015 Jul 21.
9
Endoscopic carbon dioxide laser Zenker's diverticulotomy revisited.
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2009 Jul;118(7):512-8. doi: 10.1177/000348940911800710.
10
The safety and efficacy of endoscopic Zenker's diverticulotomy: A cohort study.
Laryngoscope. 2016 Dec;126(12):2705-2710. doi: 10.1002/lary.26046. Epub 2016 May 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Cricopharyngeus muscle dysfunction: a poorly defined disorder from diagnosis to treatment.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Sep;281(9):4519-4527. doi: 10.1007/s00405-024-08644-7. Epub 2024 May 7.
2
Foregut Diverticula.
Korean J Fam Med. 2021 May;42(3):191-196. doi: 10.4082/kjfm.18.0092. Epub 2019 Oct 29.
3
Open Versus Endoscopic Surgery of Zenker's Diverticula: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Dysphagia. 2019 Dec;34(6):930-938. doi: 10.1007/s00455-019-09994-9. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
4
Systemic inflammatory response after endoscopic surgery of Zenker's diverticulum.
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2019 Aug;39(4):230-234. doi: 10.14639/0392-100X-1576. Epub 2019 Jan 31.
6
Long-term results using LigaSure™ 5 mm instrument for treatment of Zenker's diverticulum.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 Apr;274(4):1939-1944. doi: 10.1007/s00405-017-4489-8. Epub 2017 Feb 20.
7
Techniques and efficacy of flexible endoscopic therapy of Zenker's diverticulum.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Mar 16;7(3):206-12. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v7.i3.206.
8
A Tailored Approach to the Surgical Treatment of Zenker's Diverticula.
J Gastrointest Surg. 2015 May;19(5):949-54. doi: 10.1007/s11605-015-2774-7. Epub 2015 Feb 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Revision Zenker diverticulum: laser versus stapler outcomes following initial endoscopic failure.
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2013 Apr;122(4):247-53. doi: 10.1177/000348941312200406.
2
[Treatment of Zenker's diverticulum: comparison of different techniques].
Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp. 2013 Jan-Feb;64(1):1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.otorri.2012.06.002. Epub 2012 Dec 20.
3
Laser versus stapler: outcomes in endoscopic repair of Zenker diverticulum.
Laryngoscope. 2012 Sep;122(9):1961-6. doi: 10.1002/lary.23398. Epub 2012 Jul 2.
6
The endoscopic management of Zenker diverticulum: CO2 laser versus endoscopic stapling.
Laryngoscope. 2006 Sep;116(9):1608-11. doi: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000233508.06499.41.
7
Levels of evidence in otolaryngology journals.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006 May;134(5):717-23. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2005.11.049.
8
Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample.
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2005 Apr 20;5:13. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-5-13.
9
The endoscopic operation for hypopharyngeal diverticula: a roentgencinematographic study.
AMA Arch Otolaryngol. 1960 May;71:744-52. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1960.03770050004002.
10
Current trends in management of Zenker diverticulum.
Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003 Jun;11(3):160-5. doi: 10.1097/00020840-200306000-00006.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验