Ichihashi Y, Oie M
Department of Virology, Faculty of Medicine, Niigata University, Japan.
Virology. 1988 Mar;163(1):133-44. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(88)90240-1.
Epitopes on the surface components of orthopoxviruses were analyzed with monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) against monkeypox and vaccinia viruses by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), Western blotting (WB), radioimmunoprecipitation (RIP), and competitive binding inhibition assay (CBIA). When compared by ELISA, three vaccinia virus strains exhibited a similar reactivity to 99 tested MAbs despite their remote passage history. All five isolates of monkeypox virus closely resembled one another, irrespective of the host species (human, monkey, squirrel) from which they were isolated. Taterapox virus reacted similar to vaccinia virus against 97 of the 99 tested MAbs, and reacted with 2 MAbs which were cross-reactive with monkeypox and mousepox. Mousepox and cowpox viruses reacted with these MAbs in a species-specific manner: MAbs reactive to cowpox virus distinctly differ from those reactive to mousepox virus. Of the 99 tested MAbs, 32 reacted with all the 11 tested orthopoxviruses, indicating that the corresponding epitopes existed in all the viruses. Fifty-four MAbs reacted with two or more virus species and were classified as partially common MAbs. Eight MAbs were apparently type-specific for monkeypox, and five were specific for vaccinia and taterapox viruses. No strain-specific epitope was detected. Sera of monkeypox-infected patients, when analyzed by CBIA, interfered with the binding of monkeypox-specific MAb H12C1 but not of vaccinia-specific MAb G6C6. Sera of monkeypox-infected patients who had been vaccinated competed against both MAbs, demonstrating the original antigenic sin phenomenon. The two MAbs could distinguish between the sera of monkeypox patients and those of vaccinated persons. However, the serum of a smallpox patient was competitive against these apparently vaccinia- or monkeypox-specific MAbs. Three of the eight monkeypox-specific epitopes were recognized by the above CBIA test, which suggests that they also exist in smallpox virus. The mosaic-like combination of common epitopes and the small number of type-specific epitopes manifested the antigenic characteristics of orthopox viruses. The species boundary was obscured due to the partially common epitopes, but the total composition of epitopes was stable enough to maintain the antigenic species-specificity. The mutual relationship of the orthopoxviruses was visualized in a three-dimensional network.
通过酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)、蛋白质印迹法(WB)、放射免疫沉淀法(RIP)和竞争性结合抑制测定(CBIA),使用抗猴痘病毒和痘苗病毒的单克隆抗体(MAb)分析了正痘病毒表面成分上的表位。通过ELISA比较时,尽管三种痘苗病毒株传代历史久远,但它们对99种测试单克隆抗体表现出相似的反应性。所有五株猴痘病毒分离株彼此非常相似,无论其分离自何种宿主物种(人、猴、松鼠)。塔特痘病毒对99种测试单克隆抗体中的97种的反应与痘苗病毒相似,并与2种与猴痘和鼠痘交叉反应的单克隆抗体发生反应。鼠痘病毒和牛痘病毒以物种特异性方式与这些单克隆抗体发生反应:对牛痘病毒有反应的单克隆抗体与对鼠痘病毒有反应的单克隆抗体明显不同。在99种测试单克隆抗体中,32种与所有11种测试的正痘病毒发生反应,表明相应的表位存在于所有病毒中。54种单克隆抗体与两种或更多病毒物种发生反应,被归类为部分共同单克隆抗体。8种单克隆抗体显然对猴痘具有型特异性,5种对痘苗病毒和塔特痘病毒具有特异性。未检测到菌株特异性表位。通过CBIA分析,猴痘感染患者的血清会干扰猴痘特异性单克隆抗体H12C1的结合,但不会干扰痘苗特异性单克隆抗体G6C6的结合。接种过疫苗的猴痘感染患者的血清与两种单克隆抗体都有竞争,证明了原始抗原罪现象。这两种单克隆抗体可以区分猴痘患者和接种疫苗者的血清。然而,一名天花患者的血清与这些显然是痘苗或猴痘特异性的单克隆抗体具有竞争性。上述CBIA测试识别出了8种猴痘特异性表位中的3种,这表明它们也存在于天花病毒中。共同表位的镶嵌式组合和少量型特异性表位体现了正痘病毒的抗原特征。由于部分共同表位,物种界限变得模糊,但表位的总体组成足够稳定,以维持抗原的物种特异性。正痘病毒之间的相互关系在三维网络中得以呈现。