Mewton Louise, Smith Jessica, Rossouw Pieter, Andrews Gavin
Clinical Research Unit for Anxiety and Depression, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2014 Jan 30;7:37-46. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S40879. eCollection 2014.
The aim of the current review is to provide a summary of research into Internet-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy (iCBT) for anxiety disorders. We include 37 randomized controlled trials that examined the efficacy of iCBT programs in adults (aged over 18 years), as compared with waiting list or active control. The included studies were identified from Medline searches and from reference lists, and only published data were included. Several trials of iCBT for generalized anxiety disorder, panic disorder, and social phobia were identified. Two trials of iCBT for obsessive-compulsive disorder were identified, whilst one trial each was identified for hypochondriasis, specific phobia (spiders), and post-traumatic stress disorder. Finally, there were five trials that focused on transdiagnostic therapy for either a range of comorbid anxiety disorders or comorbid anxiety and depression. Between-group effect sizes were moderate to large for all disorders, and ranged from 0.30 to 2.53. iCBT was found to be commensurate with face-to-face cognitive behavioral therapy whether delivered individually or in group format. Guidance may not be necessary for iCBT to be effective for immediate gains, but may be more important in longer-term maintenance of symptom improvement and maximizing patient adherence. The clinical experience of the individual providing guidance does not appear to impact treatment outcomes. Future research needs to focus on the optimal level of guidance required to generate maximum patient benefits, whilst balancing the efficient use of clinician time and resources. Evidence-based contraindications to iCBT should also be developed so that the choice of treatment modality accurately reflects patients' needs. Further research should be conducted into the effective elements of iCBT, as well as the extent to which therapy enhancers and advancing technology can be accommodated into established iCBT frameworks.
本次综述的目的是总结针对焦虑症的互联网认知行为疗法(iCBT)的研究。我们纳入了37项随机对照试验,这些试验考察了iCBT项目对成年人(18岁以上)的疗效,并与等待名单或积极对照进行了比较。纳入的研究通过检索Medline及参考文献列表确定,仅纳入已发表的数据。确定了几项针对广泛性焦虑症、惊恐障碍和社交恐惧症的iCBT试验。确定了两项针对强迫症的iCBT试验,而针对疑病症、特定恐惧症(蜘蛛)和创伤后应激障碍的试验各有一项。最后,有五项试验聚焦于针对一系列共病焦虑症或共病焦虑和抑郁的跨诊断疗法。所有疾病组间效应量为中等至较大,范围从0.30至2.53。发现iCBT无论是单独提供还是以小组形式提供,其效果与面对面认知行为疗法相当。对于iCBT而言,即时获益可能无需指导,但在症状改善的长期维持以及最大化患者依从性方面,指导可能更为重要。提供指导的个体的临床经验似乎不会影响治疗结果。未来的研究需要聚焦于为患者带来最大益处所需的最佳指导水平,同时平衡临床医生时间和资源的有效利用。还应制定iCBT基于证据的禁忌证,以便治疗方式的选择能准确反映患者需求。应进一步研究iCBT的有效要素,以及治疗增强剂和先进技术可在多大程度上融入既定的iCBT框架。