• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

名词短语长度对指代表达形式的影响。

The effect of noun phrase length on the form of referring expressions.

作者信息

Karimi Hossein, Fukumura Kumiko, Ferreira Fernanda, Pickering Martin J

机构信息

University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA,

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 2014 Aug;42(6):993-1009. doi: 10.3758/s13421-014-0400-7.

DOI:10.3758/s13421-014-0400-7
PMID:24596114
Abstract

The length of a noun phrase has been shown to influence choices such as syntactic role assignment (e.g., whether the noun phrase is realized as the subject or the object). But does length also affect the choice between different forms of referring expressions? Three experiments investigated the effect of antecedent length on the choice between pronouns (e.g., he) and repeated nouns (e.g., the actor) using a sentence-continuation paradigm. Experiments 1 and 2 found an effect of antecedent length on written continuations: Participants used more pronouns (relative to repeated nouns) when the antecedent was longer than when it was shorter. Experiment 3 used a spoken continuation task and replicated the effect of antecedent length on the choice of referring expressions. Taken together, the results suggest that longer antecedents increase the likelihood of pronominal reference. The results support theories arguing that length enhances the accessibility of the associated entity through richer semantic encoding.

摘要

研究表明,名词短语的长度会影响句法角色分配等选择(例如,该名词短语是作主语还是宾语)。但是,长度是否也会影响不同指代表达形式之间的选择呢?三项实验采用句子续写范式,研究了先行词长度对代词(如he)和重复名词(如the actor)之间选择的影响。实验1和实验2发现先行词长度对书面续写有影响:当先行词较长时,与先行词较短时相比,参与者使用的代词更多(相对于重复名词)。实验3采用口语续写任务,并重现了先行词长度对指代表达选择的影响。综合来看,结果表明较长的先行词会增加使用代词指代的可能性。这些结果支持了一些理论,这些理论认为长度通过更丰富的语义编码提高了相关实体的可及性。

相似文献

1
The effect of noun phrase length on the form of referring expressions.名词短语长度对指代表达形式的影响。
Mem Cognit. 2014 Aug;42(6):993-1009. doi: 10.3758/s13421-014-0400-7.
2
Semantic and syntactic forces in noun phrase production.名词短语生成中的语义和句法力量。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2002 Jan;28(1):46-58. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.28.1.46.
3
Producing pronouns and definite noun phrases: do speakers use the addressee's discourse model?生成代词和定指名词短语:说话者是否使用了受话者的话语模型?
Cogn Sci. 2012 Sep-Oct;36(7):1289-311. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2012.01255.x. Epub 2012 Jun 1.
4
Pronominal anaphora resolution in Polish: Investigating online sentence interpretation using eye-tracking.波兰语代词回指消解:使用眼动追踪研究在线句子理解。
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 11;17(1):e0262459. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262459. eCollection 2022.
5
Informativity renders a referent more accessible: Evidence from eyetracking.信息性使所指对象更容易被获取:来自眼动追踪的证据。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2016 Apr;23(2):507-25. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0917-1.
6
Scope of lexical access in spoken sentence production: implications for the conceptual-syntactic interface.口语句子生成中词汇提取的范围:对概念-句法接口的启示
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009 Sep;35(5):1240-55. doi: 10.1037/a0016367.
7
Is anaphoric reference cooperative?回指是合作性的吗?
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2016;69(6):1109-28. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1070184. Epub 2015 Aug 6.
8
The relationship between sentence meaning and word order: evidence from structural priming in German.句子意义与词序之间的关系:来自德语结构启动效应的证据。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2014 Feb;67(2):304-18. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2013.807855. Epub 2013 Jun 21.
9
Effects of phrase and word frequencies in noun phrase production.名词短语生成中短语和单词频率的影响。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2019 Jan;45(1):147-165. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000570. Epub 2018 Apr 26.
10
Semantic integration processes at different levels of syntactic hierarchy during sentence comprehension: an ERP study.句法语义层次不同水平上的句子理解中的语义整合过程:一项 ERP 研究。
Neuropsychologia. 2010 May;48(6):1551-62. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.02.001. Epub 2010 Feb 6.

引用本文的文献

1
The facilitatory effect of modifications (semantic richness) on subsequent retrieval during language comprehension is age-invariant, but depends on level of engagement with task.在语言理解过程中,修饰(语义丰富性)对后续检索的促进作用不随年龄变化,但取决于对任务的参与程度。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2025 Jul;51(7):1141-1156. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001420. Epub 2024 Dec 12.
2
Age-related differences in memory encoding and retrieval during referential processing: A time-frequency analysis.年龄相关的参照加工中记忆编码和提取的差异:时频分析。
Psychol Aging. 2024 Nov;39(7):731-749. doi: 10.1037/pag0000857.
3
Cognitive Neuroscience Perspectives on Language Acquisition and Processing.

本文引用的文献

1
Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal.用于验证性假设检验的随机效应结构:保持其最大化。
J Mem Lang. 2013 Apr;68(3). doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001.
2
Gender affects semantic competition: the effect of gender in a non-gender-marking language.性别影响语义竞争:非性别标记语言中的性别效应。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 Jul;39(4):1012-21. doi: 10.1037/a0031215. Epub 2013 Jan 28.
3
Coherence and Coreference Revisited.再谈连贯与指代
语言习得与处理的认知神经科学视角
Brain Sci. 2023 Nov 21;13(12):1613. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13121613.
4
Delayed onset facilitates subsequent retrieval of words during language comprehension.延迟启动有助于语言理解过程中后续单词的提取。
Mem Cognit. 2024 Apr;52(3):491-508. doi: 10.3758/s13421-023-01479-3. Epub 2023 Oct 24.
5
Sheer Time Spent Expecting or Maintaining a Representation Facilitates Subsequent Retrieval during Sentence Processing.单纯花费在期待或维持一种表征上的时间有助于句子加工过程中的后续提取。
Cogsci. 2020 Jul-Aug;2020:2728-2734.
6
A systematic evaluation of factors affecting referring expression choice in passage completion tasks.对影响段落完成任务中指代表达选择的因素进行的系统评估。
J Mem Lang. 2023 Jun;130:None. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2023.104413.
7
The effects of semantic similarity on Mandarin speakers' referential expressions.语义相似性对普通话使用者指称表达的影响。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2023 Nov;76(11):2579-2595. doi: 10.1177/17470218231154578. Epub 2023 Mar 1.
8
Age-related differences in the retrieval of phonologically similar words during sentence processing: Evidence from ERPs.年龄相关的句子处理中语音相似词提取的差异:来自 ERP 的证据。
Brain Lang. 2021 Sep;220:104982. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2021.104982. Epub 2021 Jun 19.
9
"A cruel king" is not the same as "a king who is cruel": Modifier position affects how words are encoded and retrieved from memory.“残忍的国王”与“残忍的国王”并不相同:修饰语的位置会影响单词在记忆中的编码和解码方式。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2019 Nov;45(11):2010-2035. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000694. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
10
Elaboration over a Discourse Facilitates Retrieval in Sentence Processing.话语详述有助于句子处理中的检索。
Front Psychol. 2016 Mar 15;7:374. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00374. eCollection 2016.
J Semant. 2008;25(1):1-44. doi: 10.1093/jos/ffm018. Epub 2007 Oct 9.
4
Representational Complexity and Memory Retrieval in Language Comprehension.语言理解中的表征复杂性与记忆检索
Lang Cogn Process. 2011;26(3):376-405. doi: 10.1080/01690965.2010.492642. Epub 2010 Jul 19.
5
An activation-based model of sentence processing as skilled memory retrieval.基于激活的句子处理模型是一种熟练的记忆检索。
Cogn Sci. 2005 May 6;29(3):375-419. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog0000_25.
6
It's not just the "heavy NP": relative phrase length modulates the production of heavy-NP shift.不仅仅是“重名词短语”:短语长度会调节重名词短语移位的产生。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2011 Jun;40(3):177-87. doi: 10.1007/s10936-010-9163-x.
7
Redundancy and reduction: speakers manage syntactic information density.冗余与简化:说话者如何管理句法信息密度
Cogn Psychol. 2010 Aug;61(1):23-62. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2010.02.002.
8
The use of visual context during the production of referring expressions.在生成指代表达时视觉语境的运用。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2010 Sep;63(9):1700-15. doi: 10.1080/17470210903490969. Epub 2010 Feb 1.
9
Categorical Data Analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards Logit Mixed Models.分类数据分析:远离方差分析(无论是否进行变换),转向逻辑混合模型。
J Mem Lang. 2008 Nov;59(4):434-446. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.007.
10
The effect of additional characters on choice of referring expression: Everyone counts.额外特征对指代表达选择的影响:人人都重要。
J Mem Lang. 2007 May;56(4):521-536. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2006.09.007.