• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

应对在线患者社区中支持“完整的人”所面临的困境。

Tackling Dilemmas in Supporting "The Whole Person" in Online Patient Communities.

作者信息

Huh Jina, Patel Rupa, Pratt Wanda

出版信息

Proc SIGCHI Conf Hum Factor Comput Syst. 2012;2012:923-926. doi: 10.1145/2207676.2208535.

DOI:10.1145/2207676.2208535
PMID:24634893
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3949736/
Abstract

Online health communities that engage the patient as a attend to personal and medical needs in a holistic manner. Whether current communities structure interaction between health professionals and patients to address the whole person is an open question. To gain insights into this question, we examined a sample of online patient communities to understand health professionals' involvement in bringing in medical advice into peer-patient conversations. We found the communities fall short in supporting the whole person, because (1) patient expertise and clinical expertise generated by health professionals are shared separately, and (2) patients' quantified data are separate from narrative experiences. Such separation in the design of these systems can lead to limitations in addressing patients' interwoven medical and personal concerns. We discuss dilemmas and design implications for supporting the whole person in online patient communities.

摘要

让患者参与其中的在线健康社区会以整体方式关注个人和医疗需求。当前的社区是否构建了健康专业人员与患者之间的互动以关注整个人,这是一个悬而未决的问题。为了深入了解这个问题,我们研究了在线患者社区的一个样本,以了解健康专业人员在将医疗建议引入患者间对话方面的参与情况。我们发现这些社区在支持整个人方面存在不足,原因如下:(1)患者的专业知识和健康专业人员产生的临床专业知识是分开共享的;(2)患者的量化数据与叙述性经历是分开的。这些系统设计中的这种分离可能会导致在解决患者相互交织的医疗和个人问题时受到限制。我们讨论了在在线患者社区中支持整个人的困境和设计启示。

相似文献

1
Tackling Dilemmas in Supporting "The Whole Person" in Online Patient Communities.应对在线患者社区中支持“完整的人”所面临的困境。
Proc SIGCHI Conf Hum Factor Comput Syst. 2012;2012:923-926. doi: 10.1145/2207676.2208535.
2
Managing the personal side of health: how patient expertise differs from the expertise of clinicians.管理健康的个人层面:患者的专业知识与临床医生的专业知识有何不同。
J Med Internet Res. 2011 Aug 16;13(3):e62. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1728.
3
Community engagement and involvement in Ghana: conversations with community stakeholders to inform surgical research.加纳的社区参与:与社区利益相关者的对话,为外科研究提供信息。
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Jul 5;7(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00270-5.
4
Weaving Clinical Expertise in Online Health Communities.将临床专业知识融入在线健康社区。
Proc SIGCHI Conf Hum Factor Comput Syst. 2014;2014:1355-1364. doi: 10.1145/2556288.2557293.
5
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
6
Perception of peer advice in online health communities: Access to lay expertise.在线健康社区中对同行建议的感知:获取非专业知识。
Soc Sci Med. 2021 May;277:113117. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113117. Epub 2020 Sep 2.
7
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
8
Views of Community Managers on Knowledge Co-creation in Online Communities for People With Disabilities: Qualitative Study.社区管理者对残疾人在线社区知识共创的看法:定性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Oct 10;19(10):e320. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7406.
9
Exploring the benefits and challenges of health professionals' participation in online health communities: Emergence of (dis)empowerment processes and outcomes.探索健康专业人员参与在线健康社区的益处与挑战:(去)赋权过程及结果的出现
Int J Med Inform. 2017 Feb;98:13-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.11.005. Epub 2016 Nov 24.
10
Online Communities as a Driver for Patient Empowerment: Systematic Review.在线社区作为患者赋权的驱动力:系统综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Feb 9;23(2):e19910. doi: 10.2196/19910.

引用本文的文献

1
Don't you tweet me badly: Anxiety contagion between leaders and followers in computer-mediated communication during COVID-19.不要在推特上给我发不好的内容:新冠疫情期间计算机中介交流中领导与下属间的焦虑传染。
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 4;17(3):e0264444. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264444. eCollection 2022.
2
Internet-Based Information Behavior After Pregnancy Loss: Interview Study.流产后基于互联网的信息行为:访谈研究
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Mar 2;6(3):e32640. doi: 10.2196/32640.
3
Safe Enough to Share: Setting the Dementia Agenda Online.安全到足以分享:在网上设定痴呆症议程。
CSCW Conf Comput Support Coop Work. 2019 Nov;3.
4
Articulating a Patient-Centered Design Space for Cancer Journeys.构建以患者为中心的癌症诊疗历程设计空间。
EAI Endorsed Trans Pervasive Health Technol. 2017;3(9). doi: 10.4108/eai.21-3-2017.152394. Epub 2017 Mar 21.
5
Detecting Recovery Problems Just in Time: Application of Automated Linguistic Analysis and Supervised Machine Learning to an Online Substance Abuse Forum.及时发现康复问题:自动语言分析和监督式机器学习在在线药物滥用论坛中的应用
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jun 12;20(6):e10136. doi: 10.2196/10136.
6
Detecting clinically related content in online patient posts.检测在线患者帖子中的临床相关内容。
J Biomed Inform. 2017 Nov;75:96-106. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2017.09.015. Epub 2017 Oct 3.
7
Lessons Learned for Online Health Community Moderator Roles: A Mixed-Methods Study of Moderators Resigning From WebMD Communities.在线健康社区版主角色的经验教训:一项关于从WebMD社区辞职的版主的混合方法研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Sep 8;18(9):e247. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6331.
8
Weaving Clinical Expertise in Online Health Communities.将临床专业知识融入在线健康社区。
Proc SIGCHI Conf Hum Factor Comput Syst. 2014;2014:1355-1364. doi: 10.1145/2556288.2557293.
9
Clinical Questions in Online Health Communities: The Case of "See your doctor" Threads.在线健康社区中的临床问题:“看医生”主题帖的案例
CSCW Conf Comput Support Coop Work. 2015;2015:1488-1499. doi: 10.1145/2675133.2675259.
10
Patient moderator interaction in online health communities.在线健康社区中患者与版主的互动。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2013 Nov 16;2013:627-36. eCollection 2013.

本文引用的文献

1
Managing the personal side of health: how patient expertise differs from the expertise of clinicians.管理健康的个人层面:患者的专业知识与临床医生的专业知识有何不同。
J Med Internet Res. 2011 Aug 16;13(3):e62. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1728.
2
Is guided self-help as effective as face-to-face psychotherapy for depression and anxiety disorders? A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative outcome studies.指导性自助与面对面心理治疗对抑郁和焦虑障碍哪个更有效?一项比较疗效研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Psychol Med. 2010 Dec;40(12):1943-57. doi: 10.1017/S0033291710000772. Epub 2010 Apr 21.
3
Online diabetes self-management program: a randomized study.在线糖尿病自我管理项目:一项随机研究。
Diabetes Care. 2010 Jun;33(6):1275-81. doi: 10.2337/dc09-2153. Epub 2010 Mar 18.
4
The health impact of an online heart disease support group: a comparison of moderated versus unmoderated support.一个在线心脏病支持小组对健康的影响:有主持人支持与无主持人支持的比较
Health Educ Res. 2009 Aug;24(4):646-54. doi: 10.1093/her/cyp001. Epub 2009 Feb 27.
5
Social uses of personal health information within PatientsLikeMe, an online patient community: what can happen when patients have access to one another's data.患者如我(PatientsLikeMe)——一个在线患者社区中个人健康信息的社会用途:当患者能够获取彼此的数据时会发生什么。
J Med Internet Res. 2008 May 27;10(3):e15. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1053.
6
LifeLines: using visualization to enhance navigation and analysis of patient records.生命线:利用可视化增强患者记录的导航与分析
Proc AMIA Symp. 1998:76-80.
7
Patient empowerment. Results of a randomized controlled trial.患者赋权。一项随机对照试验的结果。
Diabetes Care. 1995 Jul;18(7):943-9. doi: 10.2337/diacare.18.7.943.
8
The patient-centred clinical method. 1. A model for the doctor-patient interaction in family medicine.以患者为中心的临床方法。1. 家庭医学中医生与患者互动的模型。
Fam Pract. 1986 Mar;3(1):24-30. doi: 10.1093/fampra/3.1.24.
9
Culture, illness, and care: clinical lessons from anthropologic and cross-cultural research.文化、疾病与关怀:人类学及跨文化研究的临床启示
Ann Intern Med. 1978 Feb;88(2):251-8. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-88-2-251.