Suppr超能文献

以最低价格获取水果和蔬菜:不同销售点的价格调查及竞争效应的地理分析

Obtaining fruit and vegetables for the lowest prices: pricing survey of different outlets and geographical analysis of competition effects.

作者信息

Pearson Amber L, Winter Pieta R, McBreen Ben, Stewart Georgia, Roets Rianda, Nutsford Daniel, Bowie Christopher, Donnellan Niamh, Wilson Nick

机构信息

Department of Public Health, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand; Department of Geography, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.

Department of Public Health, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2014 Mar 20;9(3):e89775. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089775. eCollection 2014.

Abstract

AIMS

Inadequate fruit and vegetable (F&V) consumption is an important dietary risk factor for disease internationally. High F&V prices can be a barrier to dietary intake and so to improve understanding of this topic we surveyed prices and potential competition between F&V outlet types.

METHODS

Over a three week early autumn period in 2013, prices were collected bi-weekly for 18 commonly purchased F&Vs from farmers' markets (FM) selling local produce (n = 3), other F&V markets (OFVM) (n = 5), supermarkets that neighbored markets (n = 8), and more distant supermarkets (n = 8), (in urban Wellington and Christchurch areas of New Zealand). Prices from an online supermarket were also collected.

RESULTS

A total of 3120 prices were collected. Most F&Vs (13/18) were significantly cheaper at OFVMs than supermarkets. Over half of the F&Vs (10/18) were significantly cheaper at nearby compared to distant supermarkets, providing evidence of a moderate 'halo effect' in price reductions in supermarkets that neighbored markets. Weekend (vs midweek) prices were also significantly cheaper at nearby (vs distant) supermarkets, supporting evidence for a 'halo effect'. Ideal weekly 'food basket' prices for a two adult, two child family were: OFVMs (NZ$76), online supermarket ($113), nearby supermarkets ($124), distant supermarkets ($127), and FMs ($138). This represents a savings of $49 per week (US$26) by using OFVMs relative to (non-online) supermarkets. Similarly, a shift from non-online supermarkets to the online supermarket would generate a $13 saving.

CONCLUSIONS

In these locations general markets appear to be providing some substantially lower prices for fruit and vegetables than supermarkets. They also appear to be depressing prices in neighboring supermarkets. These results, when supplemented by other needed research, may help inform the case for interventions to improve access to fruit and vegetables, particularly for low-income populations.

摘要

目的

水果和蔬菜(F&V)摄入不足是全球范围内疾病的一个重要饮食风险因素。F&V价格较高可能会成为饮食摄入的障碍,因此,为了更好地理解这一问题,我们调查了F&V销售点类型之间的价格及潜在竞争情况。

方法

在2013年早秋的三周时间里,每两周收集一次18种常见F&V的价格,这些F&V来自销售本地农产品的农贸市场(FM)(n = 3)、其他F&V市场(OFVM)(n = 5)、与市场相邻的超市(n = 8)以及距离较远的超市(n = 8)(位于新西兰惠灵顿和克赖斯特彻奇的市区)。还收集了一家在线超市的价格。

结果

共收集到3120个价格数据。大多数F&V(13/18)在OFVM的价格明显低于超市。超过一半的F&V(10/18)在相邻超市的价格明显低于距离较远的超市,这为与市场相邻的超市存在适度的“光环效应”(价格降低)提供了证据。相邻超市周末(与工作日中间时段相比)的价格也明显更低,这也支持了“光环效应”的证据。一个由两名成年人和两个孩子组成的家庭每周理想的“食物篮”价格分别为:OFVM(76新西兰元)、在线超市(113新西兰元)、相邻超市(124新西兰元)、距离较远的超市(127新西兰元)和农贸市场(138新西兰元)。相对于(非在线)超市,通过选择OFVM,每周可节省49新西兰元(26美元)。同样,从非在线超市转向在线超市可节省13新西兰元。

结论

在这些地点,一般市场上水果和蔬菜价格似乎比超市低很多。它们似乎还压低了相邻超市的价格。这些结果,再加上其他必要的研究,可能有助于为改善水果和蔬菜获取情况的干预措施提供依据,特别是针对低收入人群。

相似文献

3
Association of supermarket characteristics with the body mass index of their shoppers.
Nutr J. 2013 Aug 13;12:117. doi: 10.1186/1475-2891-12-117.
5
Discounts on fruit and vegetables combined with a space management intervention increased sales in supermarkets.
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2017 Apr;71(4):476-480. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2016.272. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
8
Socioeconomic differences in the cost, availability and quality of healthy food in Sydney.
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2017 Dec;41(6):567-571. doi: 10.1111/1753-6405.12694. Epub 2017 Jul 16.
9
Urban farmers' markets: accessibility, offerings, and produce variety, quality, and price compared to nearby stores.
Appetite. 2015 Jul;90:23-30. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2015.02.034. Epub 2015 Feb 27.
10
Is price a barrier to eating more fruits and vegetables for low-income families?
J Am Diet Assoc. 2007 Nov;107(11):1909-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2007.08.015. Epub 2007 Oct 18.

引用本文的文献

3
Evidence Gaps in Assessments of the Healthiness of Online Supermarkets Highlight the Need for New Monitoring Tools: a Systematic Review.
Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2022 Apr;24(4):215-233. doi: 10.1007/s11883-022-01004-y. Epub 2022 Feb 9.
7
Food environment, social deprivation and obesity among students from Brazilian public schools.
Public Health Nutr. 2019 Aug;22(11):1920-1927. doi: 10.1017/S136898001800112X. Epub 2018 May 11.
8
The role of the local retail food environment in fruit, vegetable and sugar-sweetened beverage consumption in Brazil.
Public Health Nutr. 2016 Apr;19(6):1093-102. doi: 10.1017/S1368980015001524. Epub 2015 Jun 9.
9
Urban farmers' markets: accessibility, offerings, and produce variety, quality, and price compared to nearby stores.
Appetite. 2015 Jul;90:23-30. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2015.02.034. Epub 2015 Feb 27.

本文引用的文献

3
A farmers' market at a federally qualified health center improves fruit and vegetable intake among low-income diabetics.
Prev Med. 2013 May;56(5):288-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.01.018. Epub 2013 Feb 4.
6
Food pricing strategies, population diets, and non-communicable disease: a systematic review of simulation studies.
PLoS Med. 2012;9(12):e1001353. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001353. Epub 2012 Dec 11.
7
Are organic foods safer or healthier than conventional alternatives?: a systematic review.
Ann Intern Med. 2012 Sep 4;157(5):348-66. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-157-5-201209040-00007.
9
Introduction of farm stands in low-income communities increases fruit and vegetable among community residents.
Health Place. 2012 Sep;18(5):1137-43. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2012.04.007. Epub 2012 May 7.
10
Public health potential of farmers' markets on medical center campuses: a case study from Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center.
Am J Public Health. 2011 Dec;101(12):2226-32. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300197. Epub 2011 Oct 20.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验