• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种常用的多维姑息治疗患者报告结局指标中,哪些问题最有用?欧洲和非洲PRISMA调查结果。

Which questions of two commonly used multidimensional palliative care patient reported outcome measures are most useful? Results from the European and African PRISMA survey.

作者信息

Higginson Irene J, Simon Steffen T, Benalia Hamid, Downing Julia, Daveson Barbara A, Harding Richard, Bausewein Claudia

机构信息

King's College London, Cicely Saunders Institute, Department of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, London, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2012 Mar;2(1):36-42. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000061. Epub 2012 Jan 4.

DOI:10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000061
PMID:24653497
Abstract

AIM

To evaluate the views of clinicians and researchers on their use of outcome measures and which questions are most important in palliative and end-of-life care.

METHODS

Online survey of professionals working in clinical care, clinical audit and research in palliative care across Europe and Africa identified through national and international associations and databases. Questions focused on measures used, reasons and which questions were important in two commonly used multidimensional measures, the Palliative care Outcome Scale (POS) and the Support Team Assessment Schedule (STAS).

RESULTS

The overall completion rate was 59% (392/663). Three outcome measures were commonly used by over one in four respondents for clinical practice and over one in 10 for research: the Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS), followed by the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) and the POS. Measures were used twice as often in clinical practice as in research. The main uses were similar: assessing patients' symptoms/needs (88% and 85% of POS and STAS users, respectively), monitoring changes (62%, 58%), evaluating care (61%, 48%) and assessing family needs (59%, 60%). Respondents rated the most important questions as pain, symptoms, emotional and family aspects. There were no differences in the choice of the most important questions between doctors and nurses or between researchers and clinicians.

CONCLUSIONS

In palliative care, outcome measures often used in clinical practice are also often used in research. Questions relating to pain, symptoms, emotional needs and family concerns are consistently considered the most useful and important in palliative patient reported outcome measures (PROMs).

摘要

目的

评估临床医生和研究人员对其使用结局指标的看法,以及在姑息治疗和临终关怀中哪些问题最为重要。

方法

通过国家和国际协会及数据库,对欧洲和非洲从事姑息治疗临床护理、临床审计和研究的专业人员进行在线调查。问题集中在使用的指标、原因,以及在两种常用的多维指标——姑息治疗结局量表(POS)和支持团队评估表(STAS)中哪些问题很重要。

结果

总体完成率为59%(392/663)。超过四分之一的受访者在临床实践中常用三种结局指标,超过十分之一的受访者在研究中常用:卡氏功能状态量表(KPS),其次是埃德蒙顿症状评估量表(ESAS)和POS。这些指标在临床实践中的使用频率是研究中的两倍。主要用途相似:评估患者的症状/需求(分别为POS和STAS使用者的88%和85%)、监测变化(62%,58%)、评估护理(61%,48%)和评估家庭需求(59%,60%)。受访者将最重要的问题评为疼痛、症状、情感和家庭方面。医生和护士之间或研究人员与临床医生之间在最重要问题的选择上没有差异。

结论

在姑息治疗中,临床实践中常用的结局指标在研究中也经常被使用。在姑息治疗患者报告结局指标(PROMs)中,与疼痛、症状、情感需求和家庭关切相关的问题一直被认为是最有用和最重要的。

相似文献

1
Which questions of two commonly used multidimensional palliative care patient reported outcome measures are most useful? Results from the European and African PRISMA survey.两种常用的多维姑息治疗患者报告结局指标中,哪些问题最有用?欧洲和非洲PRISMA调查结果。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2012 Mar;2(1):36-42. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000061. Epub 2012 Jan 4.
2
Republished: which questions of two commonly used multidimensional palliative care patient reported outcome measures are most useful? Results from the European and African PRISMA survey.再发表:两种常用多维姑息治疗患者报告结局测量工具的哪些问题最有用?来自欧洲和非洲 PRISMA 调查的结果。
Postgrad Med J. 2012 Aug;88(1042):451-7. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2011-000061rep.
3
Are we heading in the same direction? European and African doctors' and nurses' views and experiences regarding outcome measurement in palliative care.我们是否朝着同一方向前进?欧洲和非洲医生和护士对姑息治疗结局测量的看法和经验。
Palliat Med. 2012 Apr;26(3):242-9. doi: 10.1177/0269216311409614. Epub 2011 Jun 22.
4
Implementing patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) in palliative care--users' cry for help.在姑息治疗中实施患者报告结局测量(PROMs)——使用者的求助呼声。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2011 Apr 20;9:27. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-9-27.
5
Professionals' views and experiences of using outcome measures in palliative care.专业人员对姑息治疗中使用结局指标的看法和经验。
Int J Palliat Nurs. 2003 Jun;9(6):234-8. doi: 10.12968/ijpn.2003.9.6.11511.
6
A longitudinal study of palliative care: patient-evaluated outcome and impact of attrition.姑息治疗的纵向研究:患者评估结果及失访影响
Cancer. 2005 Apr 15;103(8):1747-55. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20958.
7
Use of a modified ESAS in cancer patients: a pilot study of patient and staff experiences.改良版电子症状评估系统在癌症患者中的应用:一项关于患者及医护人员体验的试点研究
Int J Palliat Nurs. 2007 Dec;13(12):610-6. doi: 10.12968/ijpn.2007.13.12.27890.
8
The use of two common palliative outcome measures in clinical care and research: a systematic review of POS and STAS.在临床护理和研究中使用两种常见的姑息治疗结局测量工具:POS 和 STAS 的系统评价。
Palliat Med. 2011 Jun;25(4):304-13. doi: 10.1177/0269216310395984. Epub 2011 Apr 4.
9
Outcome measurement in paediatric palliative care: lessons from the past and future developments.儿科姑息治疗中的结果测量:过去的经验教训与未来的发展
Ann Palliat Med. 2018 Oct;7(Suppl 3):S151-S163. doi: 10.21037/apm.2018.04.02. Epub 2018 Jun 19.
10
Palliative care for people with HIV/AIDS: views of patients, carers and providers.为感染艾滋病毒/艾滋病患者提供的姑息治疗:患者、护理人员及医护人员的观点
AIDS Care. 1993;5(1):105-16. doi: 10.1080/09540129308258588.

引用本文的文献

1
Building evidence and capacity in global health palliative care.构建全球卫生姑息治疗的证据和能力。
Ecancermedicalscience. 2022 Apr 28;16:1378. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2022.1378. eCollection 2022.
2
Comprehensive Palliative Care Needs in Outpatients with Chronic Heart Failure: A Japanese Cross-Sectional Study.慢性心力衰竭门诊患者的综合姑息治疗需求:一项日本横断面研究。
Palliat Med Rep. 2022 Apr 18;3(1):65-74. doi: 10.1089/pmr.2021.0063. eCollection 2022.
3
An Integrative Framework of Appraisal and Adaptation in Serious Medical Illness.
重症疾病评估与适应的综合框架
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2020 Sep;60(3):657-677.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.05.018. Epub 2020 May 21.
4
[Needs and burdens of palliative care patients with advanced and/or metastatic head and neck tumors].[晚期和/或转移性头颈部肿瘤姑息治疗患者的需求与负担]
HNO. 2020 Jul;68(7):510-516. doi: 10.1007/s00106-020-00888-z.
5
Anxiety, depression and psychosocial needs are the most frequent concerns reported by patients: preliminary results of a comparative explorative analysis of two hospital-based palliative care teams in Germany and Japan.焦虑、抑郁和心理社会需求是患者最常报告的问题:对德国和日本两家医院姑息治疗团队的比较探索性分析的初步结果。
J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2020 Nov;127(11):1481-1489. doi: 10.1007/s00702-020-02186-y. Epub 2020 May 17.
6
A brief, patient- and proxy-reported outcome measure in advanced illness: Validity, reliability and responsiveness of the Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale (IPOS).一种简明的、针对晚期疾病患者及其代理人的结局测量工具:综合性姑息治疗结局量表(IPOS)的有效性、信度和反应度。
Palliat Med. 2019 Sep;33(8):1045-1057. doi: 10.1177/0269216319854264. Epub 2019 Jun 12.
7
Study protocol: evaluation of specialized outpatient palliative care in the German state of Hesse (ELSAH study) - work package I: assessing the quality of care.研究方案:评估德国黑森州的专门门诊姑息治疗(ELSAH 研究) - 工作包 I:评估护理质量。
BMC Palliat Care. 2018 Oct 2;17(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s12904-018-0363-8.
8
Self-report measurement of pain & symptoms in palliative care patients: a comparison of verbal, visual and hand scoring methods in Sub-Saharan Africa.姑息治疗患者疼痛与症状的自我报告测量:撒哈拉以南非洲地区言语、视觉和手部评分方法的比较
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014 Aug 2;12:118. doi: 10.1186/s12955-014-0118-z.
9
The selection and use of outcome measures in palliative and end-of-life care research: the MORECare International Consensus Workshop.在姑息治疗和临终关怀研究中选择和使用结局测量指标:MORECare 国际共识研讨会。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2013 Dec;46(6):925-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.01.010. Epub 2013 Apr 28.