• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

抗癫痫药物治疗不依从性的识别与预防:国家提供的药品数据的协同应用

Identification and prevention of antiepileptic drug noncompliance: the collaborative use of state-supplied pharmaceutical data.

作者信息

Hodges Joseph C, Treadwell Janet, Malphrus Amy D, Tran Xuan G, Giardino Angelo P

机构信息

Baylor College of Medicine and Texas Children's Hospital, 6701 Fannin Street No. 1250, Houston, TX 77030, USA ; University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, 5323 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, TX 75390, USA.

Texas Children's Health Plan, 2450 Holcombe Boulevard, Suite 34L, Houston, TX 77021, USA.

出版信息

ISRN Pediatr. 2014 Feb 19;2014:734689. doi: 10.1155/2014/734689. eCollection 2014.

DOI:10.1155/2014/734689
PMID:24693446
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3945079/
Abstract

Background. Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) noncompliance is associated with increased risk of seizures and morbidity in seizure disorder patients. Objective. To identify risk factors that correlated to higher levels of morbidity, measured by emergency room (ER) utilization by seizure disorder members taking AED. Methods. Patients with primary or secondary diagnosis of seizures, convulsions, and/or epilepsy and prescribed AEDs during an 11-month period were included in the study. Variables were analyzed using multivariate statistical analysis including logistic regression. Results. The study identified 201 members. No statistical significance (NS) between age, gender, number of tablets, type of drug, or other risk factors was associated with increased mortality. Statistical significance resulted with medication compliance review of 0-14 days, 15-60 days, and 61+ days between refills. 68% of patients with ER visit had noncompliance refill between 0 and 14 days compared to 52% of patients in non-ER group (P = 0.04). Contrastingly, 15% of ER group had refills within 15-60 days compared with 33% of non-ER group (P = 0.01). There was NS difference between two groups when noncompliance was greater than 60 days (P = 0.66). Conclusions. The study suggests that careful monitoring of pharmaceutical refill information could be used to identify AED noncompliance in epileptic patients.

摘要

背景。癫痫患者不遵医嘱服用抗癫痫药物(AEDs)会增加癫痫发作风险及发病率。目的。确定与较高发病率相关的风险因素,通过服用AED的癫痫患者使用急诊室(ER)的情况来衡量发病率。方法。研究纳入在11个月期间有癫痫、惊厥和/或癫痫的原发性或继发性诊断且开具了AEDs的患者。使用包括逻辑回归在内的多变量统计分析对变量进行分析。结果。该研究确定了201名成员。年龄、性别、药片数量、药物类型或其他风险因素与死亡率增加之间无统计学意义(NS)。在两次取药之间的0 - 14天、15 - 60天和61天以上的用药依从性审查中出现了统计学意义。68%的急诊就诊患者在0至14天之间有不遵医嘱取药情况,而非急诊组为52%(P = 0.04)。相反,15%的急诊组患者在15 - 60天内取药,而非急诊组为33%(P = 0.01)。当不遵医嘱情况大于60天时,两组之间无显著差异(P = 0.66)。结论。该研究表明,仔细监测药物取药信息可用于识别癫痫患者的AED不遵医嘱情况。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b20c/3945079/d7a1c1237b33/ISRN.PEDIATRICS2014-734689.005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b20c/3945079/c656e8b55bf8/ISRN.PEDIATRICS2014-734689.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b20c/3945079/d48e753c9bbd/ISRN.PEDIATRICS2014-734689.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b20c/3945079/4bc452158fcc/ISRN.PEDIATRICS2014-734689.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b20c/3945079/7b9baff49bc3/ISRN.PEDIATRICS2014-734689.004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b20c/3945079/d7a1c1237b33/ISRN.PEDIATRICS2014-734689.005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b20c/3945079/c656e8b55bf8/ISRN.PEDIATRICS2014-734689.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b20c/3945079/d48e753c9bbd/ISRN.PEDIATRICS2014-734689.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b20c/3945079/4bc452158fcc/ISRN.PEDIATRICS2014-734689.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b20c/3945079/7b9baff49bc3/ISRN.PEDIATRICS2014-734689.004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b20c/3945079/d7a1c1237b33/ISRN.PEDIATRICS2014-734689.005.jpg

相似文献

1
Identification and prevention of antiepileptic drug noncompliance: the collaborative use of state-supplied pharmaceutical data.抗癫痫药物治疗不依从性的识别与预防:国家提供的药品数据的协同应用
ISRN Pediatr. 2014 Feb 19;2014:734689. doi: 10.1155/2014/734689. eCollection 2014.
2
Early versus late antiepileptic drug withdrawal for people with epilepsy in remission.癫痫缓解期患者早期与晚期停用抗癫痫药物的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Feb 11;2015(2):CD001902. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001902.pub2.
3
Don't Fear the Reefer-Evidence Mounts for Plant-Based Cannabidiol as Treatment for Epilepsy.别怕大麻二酚——植物性大麻二酚作为癫痫治疗手段的证据不断增加。
Epilepsy Curr. 2019 Mar-Apr;19(2):93-95. doi: 10.1177/1535759719835671.
4
Simultaneous Use of Two Different Tools to Assess Compliance with Antiepileptic Drugs: Experience in A Community-Based Study.同时使用两种不同工具评估抗癫痫药物依从性:一项社区研究的经验
J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2020 Oct;11(4):636-639. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1715991. Epub 2020 Sep 4.
5
Risk of seizure recurrence from antiepileptic drug withdrawal among seizure-free patients for more than two years.抗癫痫药物停药后无癫痫发作超过两年的患者癫痫复发的风险。
Epilepsy Behav. 2020 Dec;113:107485. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2020.107485. Epub 2020 Nov 3.
6
Bioequivalent antiepileptic drug switching and the risk of seizure-related events.抗癫痫药物的生物等效性转换与癫痫相关事件风险。
Epilepsy Res. 2013 Sep;106(1-2):237-43. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2013.04.010. Epub 2013 May 28.
7
Switching generic antiepileptic drug manufacturer not linked to seizures: A case-crossover study.更换抗癫痫通用药物制造商与癫痫发作无关:一项病例交叉研究。
Neurology. 2016 Oct 25;87(17):1796-1801. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003259. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
8
Real life pharmaceutical treatment patterns for adult patients with focal epilepsy in Germany: a longitudinal and cross-sectional analysis of recently approved anti-epileptic drugs.德国成年局灶性癫痫患者的真实药物治疗模式:对近期获批抗癫痫药物的纵向和横断面分析
Ger Med Sci. 2017 Jun 12;15:Doc09. doi: 10.3205/000250. eCollection 2017.
9
Quality Indicator for Epilepsy Treatment 15 (QUIET-15): Intervening after recurrent seizures in the elderly.癫痫治疗质量指标15(QUIET - 15):针对老年人复发性癫痫发作后的干预措施。
Epilepsy Behav. 2017 May;70(Pt A):253-258. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2017.03.007. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
10
Rapid versus slow withdrawal of antiepileptic drugs.抗癫痫药物的快速撤药与缓慢撤药
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Apr 19(2):CD005003. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005003.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Treatment compliance, treatment patterns, and healthcare utilization in epilepsy patients with first add-on antiepileptic drugs: A nationwide cohort study.首次加用抗癫痫药物的癫痫患者的治疗依从性、治疗模式及医疗保健利用情况:一项全国性队列研究。
Heliyon. 2024 Mar 7;10(6):e27770. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27770. eCollection 2024 Mar 30.
2
A 5-Year Study of Antiseizure Medications (ASMs) Monitoring in Patients with Neuropsychiatric Disorders in an Italian Clinical Center.意大利一家临床中心对神经精神疾病患者抗癫痫药物(ASMs)监测的5年研究。
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2023 Jun 29;16(7):945. doi: 10.3390/ph16070945.
3

本文引用的文献

1
A refill adherence algorithm for multiple short intervals to estimate refill compliance (ReComp).一种用于多个短间隔的再填充依从性算法,以估计再填充依从性(ReComp)。
Med Care. 2007 Jun;45(6):497-504. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3180329368.
2
Antiepileptic drug treatment in children.儿童抗癫痫药物治疗
Expert Rev Neurother. 2007 Feb;7(2):179-93. doi: 10.1586/14737175.7.2.179.
3
Seizures and antiepileptic drugs: does exposure alter normal brain development?癫痫发作与抗癫痫药物:药物暴露会改变正常脑发育吗?
Exercise, medication adherence, and the menstrual cycle: How much do these change seizure risk?
运动、药物依从性和月经周期:这些因素对癫痫发作风险的影响有多大?
Epilepsy Res. 2022 Dec;188:107052. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2022.107052. Epub 2022 Nov 15.
4
A 5-Year Study of Lithium and Valproic Acid Drug Monitoring in Patients with Bipolar Disorders in an Italian Clinical Center.意大利一家临床中心对双相情感障碍患者进行的锂盐和丙戊酸药物监测的5年研究。
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2022 Jan 17;15(1):105. doi: 10.3390/ph15010105.
5
Medicine possession ratio as proxy for adherence to antiepileptic drugs: prevalence, associations, and cost implications.以药品持有率作为抗癫痫药物依从性的替代指标:患病率、相关性及成本影响
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2016 Apr 12;10:539-47. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S98940. eCollection 2016.
Epilepsia. 2006 Dec;47(12):1999-2010. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2006.00894.x.
4
How confident are we of the diagnosis of epilepsy?我们对癫痫的诊断有多大把握?
Epilepsia. 2006;47 Suppl 1:9-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2006.00653.x.
5
Measurement of adherence in pharmacy administrative databases: a proposal for standard definitions and preferred measures.药房管理数据库中依从性的测量:标准定义和首选测量方法的建议
Ann Pharmacother. 2006 Jul-Aug;40(7-8):1280-88. doi: 10.1345/aph.1H018.
6
Rapid versus slow withdrawal of antiepileptic drugs.抗癫痫药物的快速撤药与缓慢撤药
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Apr 19(2):CD005003. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005003.pub2.
7
Seizures in children.儿童癫痫发作
Pediatr Clin North Am. 2006 Apr;53(2):257-77. doi: 10.1016/j.pcl.2005.09.010.
8
Estimating medication persistency using administrative claims data.利用行政索赔数据估算药物持续性。
Am J Manag Care. 2005 Jul;11(7):449-57.
9
Current treatments of epilepsy.癫痫的当前治疗方法。
Neurology. 2005 Jun 28;64(12 Suppl 3):S2-11. doi: 10.1212/wnl.64.12_suppl_3.s2.
10
Clinical effectiveness, tolerability and cost-effectiveness of newer drugs for epilepsy in adults: a systematic review and economic evaluation.成人癫痫新药的临床疗效、耐受性及成本效益:一项系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2005 Apr;9(15):1-157, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta9150.