Centre Chirurgical Marie Lannelongue, INSERM 999, Université Paris XI Sud , Orsay , France.
Institut de Puériculture et de Périnatalogie, Université Paris V Descartes , Clamart , France.
Front Pediatr. 2014 Mar 25;2:16. doi: 10.3389/fped.2014.00016. eCollection 2014.
Cardiac output (CO) measurement in low (LBW) and very low (VLBW) birth weight infants is difficult. Hitherto, sporadical transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is the only non-invasive measurement method. Electrical velocimetry (EV) has been evaluated as an alternative in normal weight newborns.
The study was designed to evaluate if EV could be interchangeable with TTE even in LBW and VLBW infants.
In 28 (17 LBW, 11 VLBW) pre-mature newborns, n = 228 simultaneous TTE (trans-aortic Doppler), and EV measurements (134 LBW, 94 VLBW) of stroke volume (SV) and heart rate (HR) were performed, thereof calculating body weight indexed SV (=SV*) and CO (=CO*) for all patients and the subgroups. Method comparison was performed by Bland-Altman plot, method precision expressed by calculation of the coefficient of variation (CV).
Mean CO* in all patients was 256.4 ± 44.8 (TTE) and 265.3 ± 48.8 (EV) ml/kg/min. Bias and precision were clinically acceptable, limits of agreement within the 30% criterion for method interchangeability (17). According to their different anatomic dimensions and pathophysiology, there were significant differences of SV(), HR, and CO for LBW and VLBW infants as well for inotropic treatment and ventilation mode.
Extending recent publications on EV/TTE comparison in newborns, this study suggests that EV is also applicable in LWB/VLBW infants as a safe and easy to handle method for continuous CO monitoring in the NICU and PCICU.
在低体重(LBW)和极低体重(VLBW)出生体重的婴儿中,心输出量(CO)的测量较为困难。迄今为止,间断性经胸超声心动图(TTE)是唯一的非侵入性测量方法。在正常体重的新生儿中,已经评估了电速度测量(EV)作为替代方法。
本研究旨在评估 EV 是否可与 TTE 互换,即使在 LBW 和 VLBW 婴儿中也是如此。
在 28 例(17 例 LBW,11 例 VLBW)早产儿中,进行了 228 次 TTE(经主动脉多普勒)和 EV 测量(134 例 LBW,94 例 VLBW)的每搏量(SV)和心率(HR),并计算了所有患者和亚组的体重指数 SV(=SV*)和 CO(=CO*)。通过 Bland-Altman 图进行方法比较,通过计算变异系数(CV)来表示方法精度。
所有患者的平均 CO为 256.4±44.8(TTE)和 265.3±48.8(EV)ml/kg/min。偏差和精度在临床可接受范围内,符合方法互换性的 30%标准(17)的一致性界限。根据其不同的解剖学尺寸和病理生理学,SV()、HR 和 CO*在 LBW 和 VLBW 婴儿以及正性肌力治疗和通气模式方面存在显著差异。
本研究扩展了最近关于 EV/TTE 在新生儿中的比较的出版物,表明 EV 也适用于 LBW/VLBW 婴儿,是一种安全且易于操作的方法,可用于在 NICU 和 PCICU 中进行连续 CO 监测。