Suppr超能文献

肥胖经济学——借鉴过去,共创美好未来。

Economics of obesity--learning from the past to contribute to a better future.

作者信息

Ananthapavan Jaithri, Sacks Gary, Moodie Marj, Carter Rob

机构信息

Deakin Health Economics, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, Victoria 3125, Australia.

WHO Collaborating Centre for Obesity Prevention, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, Victoria 3125, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014 Apr 14;11(4):4007-25. doi: 10.3390/ijerph110404007.

Abstract

The discipline of economics plays a varied role in informing the understanding of the problem of obesity and the impact of different interventions aimed at addressing it. This paper discusses the causes of the obesity epidemic from an economics perspective, and outlines various justifications for government intervention in this area. The paper then focuses on the potential contribution of health economics in supporting resource allocation decision making for obesity prevention/treatment. Although economic evaluations of single interventions provide useful information, evaluations undertaken as part of a priority setting exercise provide the greatest scope for influencing decision making. A review of several priority setting examples in obesity prevention/treatment indicates that policy (as compared with program-based) interventions, targeted at prevention (as compared with treatment) and focused "upstream" on the food environment, are likely to be the most cost-effective options for change. However, in order to further support decision makers, several methodological advances are required. These include the incorporation of intervention costs/benefits outside the health sector, the addressing of equity impacts, and the increased engagement of decision makers in the priority setting process.

摘要

经济学学科在增进对肥胖问题的理解以及旨在解决该问题的不同干预措施的影响方面发挥着多样的作用。本文从经济学角度探讨肥胖流行的成因,并概述政府在这一领域进行干预的各种理由。接着,本文重点关注健康经济学在支持肥胖预防/治疗资源分配决策方面的潜在贡献。虽然对单一干预措施的经济评估提供了有用信息,但作为优先事项设定工作一部分进行的评估对决策影响的范围最大。对肥胖预防/治疗中几个优先事项设定实例的回顾表明,针对预防(与治疗相比)且“上游”聚焦于食品环境的政策(与基于项目的干预措施相比)干预措施可能是最具成本效益的变革选择。然而,为了进一步支持决策者,需要在方法上取得若干进展。这些进展包括纳入卫生部门以外的干预成本/效益、解决公平影响问题,以及让决策者更多地参与优先事项设定过程。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e0ea/4025046/11cfb793b6e9/ijerph-11-04007-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验