Suppr超能文献

孕妇细菌性阴道病诊断方法的比较。

Comparison of methods for diagnosing bacterial vaginosis among pregnant women.

作者信息

Krohn M A, Hillier S L, Eschenbach D A

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle 98195.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 1989 Jun;27(6):1266-71. doi: 10.1128/jcm.27.6.1266-1271.1989.

Abstract

The diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis is usually based on clinical criteria including homogeneous vaginal discharge, an elevated vaginal pH, the presence of clue cells, and an amine odor. We have evaluated the vaginal flora and clinical signs for 593 pregnant women. Gardnerella vaginalis, Bacteroides spp., and Mycoplasma hominis were isolated more frequently among women with clinical signs than among those without clinical signs of bacterial vaginosis in multivariable analyses that controlled for other bacteria. To determine the laboratory method that best predicted bacterial vaginosis, we calculated the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of positive and negative tests for Gram-stained vaginal smears, gas-liquid chromatography of vaginal fluid, and G. vaginalis cultures compared with clinical signs. G. vaginalis culture was sensitive (92%) and both gas-liquid chromatography (78%) and Gram-stained vaginal smears (62%) were moderately sensitive in identifying women with three of the four clinical signs of bacterial vaginosis. However, the Gram-stained vaginal smear (95%) was more specific than G. vaginalis culture (69%) or gas-liquid chromatography (81%). The predictive value of a positive test was also higher for the Gram staining (76%) than for G. vaginalis culture (41%) or gas-liquid chromatography (48%).

摘要

细菌性阴道病的诊断通常基于临床标准,包括均匀的阴道分泌物、升高的阴道pH值、线索细胞的存在以及胺味。我们对593名孕妇的阴道菌群和临床体征进行了评估。在多变量分析中,控制了其他细菌后,加德纳菌、拟杆菌属和人型支原体在有临床体征的女性中比在没有细菌性阴道病临床体征的女性中更频繁地分离出来。为了确定最能预测细菌性阴道病的实验室方法,我们计算了革兰氏染色阴道涂片、阴道液气-液色谱分析和阴道加德纳菌培养与临床体征相比的阳性和阴性试验的敏感性、特异性和预测值。阴道加德纳菌培养敏感(92%),气-液色谱分析(78%)和革兰氏染色阴道涂片(62%)在识别具有细菌性阴道病四个临床体征中的三个体征的女性时敏感性中等。然而,革兰氏染色阴道涂片(95%)比阴道加德纳菌培养(69%)或气-液色谱分析(81%)更具特异性。革兰氏染色阳性试验的预测值(76%)也高于阴道加德纳菌培养(41%)或气-液色谱分析(48%)。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

6
The Female Vaginal Microbiome in Health and Bacterial Vaginosis.女性阴道微生物组与健康和细菌性阴道病。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021 Apr 7;11:631972. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.631972. eCollection 2021.
8
Molecular Diagnosis of Bacterial Vaginosis: an Update.细菌性阴道病的分子诊断:最新进展。
J Clin Microbiol. 2018 Aug 27;56(9). doi: 10.1128/JCM.00342-18. Print 2018 Sep.

本文引用的文献

3
The vaginal microbial flora in non-specific vaginitis.非特异性阴道炎中的阴道微生物群
Eur J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Oct;1(5):301-6. doi: 10.1007/BF02019976.
4
Anaerobic bacteria in nonspecific vaginitis.非特异性阴道炎中的厌氧菌。
N Engl J Med. 1980 Sep 11;303(11):601-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198009113031102.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验