• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Treatment of cervical precancers: back to basics.宫颈前病变的治疗:回归基础。
Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Jun;123(6):1339-1343. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000287.
2
Loop electrosurgical excision procedure with or without intraoperative colposcopy: a randomized trial.环形电切术(LEEP)加或不加术中阴道镜检查:一项随机试验。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Oct;219(4):377.e1-377.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.07.023. Epub 2018 Jul 29.
3
Risk of cervical stenosis after large loop excision or laser conization.大环状切除术或激光锥切术后宫颈管狭窄的风险。
Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Dec;88(6):933-8. doi: 10.1016/S0029-7844(96)00331-6.
4
Electrosurgical loop excision of the cervical transformation zone: the experience of family physicians.宫颈转化区的电外科环形切除术:家庭医生的经验
J Fam Pract. 1995 Oct;41(4):337-44.
5
Interpretability of excisional biopsies of the cervix: cone biopsy and loop excision.宫颈切除活检的可解释性:锥形活检和环形切除术。
J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2009 Jan;13(1):10-2. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0b013e31817ff940.
6
Treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and risk of preterm delivery.宫颈上皮内瘤变的治疗与早产风险
JAMA. 2004 May 5;291(17):2100-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.17.2100.
7
Expanding management strategies for cervical precancerous lesions in resource-limited settings: insights from a training center in a district hospital in Ghana.资源有限环境下的宫颈癌前病变管理策略拓展:加纳一家地区医院培训中心的经验。
BMC Womens Health. 2024 Jul 27;24(1):428. doi: 10.1186/s12905-024-03263-0.
8
Excisional treatment in women with cervical adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS): a prospective randomised controlled non-inferiority trial to compare AIS persistence/recurrence after loop electrosurgical excision procedure with cold knife cone biopsy: protocol for a pilot study.宫颈原位腺癌(AIS)女性患者的切除治疗:一项前瞻性随机对照非劣效性试验,比较环形电切术与冷刀锥切术后AIS的持续/复发情况:一项试点研究方案
BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 28;7(8):e017576. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017576.
9
Adverse obstetric outcomes after local treatment for cervical preinvasive and early invasive disease according to cone depth: systematic review and meta-analysis.根据锥形切除深度对宫颈浸润前和早期浸润性疾病进行局部治疗后的不良产科结局:系统评价和荟萃分析
BMJ. 2016 Jul 28;354:i3633. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i3633.
10
Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure Instead of Cold-Knife Conization for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia in Women With Unsatisfactory Colposcopic Examinations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.对于阴道镜检查结果不满意的女性,采用环形电切术而非冷刀锥切术治疗宫颈上皮内瘤变:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2017 Apr;21(2):129-136. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0000000000000287.

引用本文的文献

1
The Lymphocyte-to-Monocyte Ratio (LMR) as a Novel Biomarker for Cervical Cancer Risk Stratification in Conization Patients.淋巴细胞与单核细胞比值(LMR)作为锥切术患者宫颈癌风险分层的新型生物标志物。
J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 27;14(17):6057. doi: 10.3390/jcm14176057.
2
The Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (PLR) as a Non-Invasive Biomarker for Cervical Malignancy in Conization Patients.血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR)作为锥切术患者宫颈恶性肿瘤的无创生物标志物
Life (Basel). 2025 Jun 18;15(6):971. doi: 10.3390/life15060971.
3
The Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) as a Potential Predictor in Conization Outcomes for Cervical Cancer.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)作为宫颈癌锥切术预后的潜在预测指标。
Cancers (Basel). 2025 May 31;17(11):1856. doi: 10.3390/cancers17111856.
4
The salivary microbiota is altered in cervical dysplasia patients and influenced by conization.宫颈发育异常患者的唾液微生物群发生改变,并受锥切术影响。
Imeta. 2023 May 12;2(3):e108. doi: 10.1002/imt2.108. eCollection 2023 Aug.
5
From Diagnosis to Treatment: Exploring the Latest Management Trends in Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia.从诊断到治疗:探索宫颈上皮内瘤变的最新管理趋势
Cureus. 2023 Dec 10;15(12):e50291. doi: 10.7759/cureus.50291. eCollection 2023 Dec.
6
Bacterial Species from Vaginal Microbiota Differently Affect the Production of the E6 and E7 Oncoproteins and of p53 and p-Rb Oncosuppressors in HPV16-Infected Cells.阴道微生物群中的细菌物种对 HPV16 感染细胞中 E6 和 E7 癌蛋白以及 p53 和 p-Rb 抑癌蛋白的产生有不同的影响。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Apr 12;24(8):7173. doi: 10.3390/ijms24087173.
7
The Role of Methylation of Host and/or Human Papillomavirus (HPV) DNA in Management of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 (CIN2) Lesions.宿主和/或人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)DNA 甲基化在管理 2 级宫颈上皮内瘤变(CIN2)病变中的作用。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Mar 30;24(7):6479. doi: 10.3390/ijms24076479.
8
Patient Adherence to Follow-Up Recommendations Following Cryotherapy for Treatment of High-Grade Cervical Dysplasia.冷冻疗法治疗高级别宫颈发育异常后患者对随访建议的依从性
Cureus. 2022 Oct 10;14(10):e30154. doi: 10.7759/cureus.30154. eCollection 2022 Oct.
9
The Appropriate of Cone Depth in Loop Electrical Excision Procedure (LEEP) for Negative Pathological Margin from High Grade Precancerous Lesion of Cervix, Retrospective Study.宫颈高级别癌前病变行环形电切术(LEEP)时切缘阴性的锥切深度选择:回顾性研究
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2022 Feb 1;23(2):659-664. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2022.23.2.659.
10
Development of a Novel Mouse Model of Spontaneous High-Risk HPVE6/E7-Expressing Carcinoma in the Cervicovaginal Tract.开发一种新型宫颈阴道组织中自发性高危型 HPV E6/E7 表达癌的小鼠模型。
Cancer Res. 2021 Sep 1;81(17):4560-4569. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-21-0399. Epub 2021 Jul 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Treatment patterns for cervical carcinoma in situ in Michigan, 1998-2003.1998 - 2003年密歇根州原位宫颈癌的治疗模式
J Registry Manag. 2013 Summer;40(2):84-92.
2
Pregnancy outcome following loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) a systematic review and meta-analysis.环形电外科切除术(LEEP)后的妊娠结局:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014 Jan;289(1):85-99. doi: 10.1007/s00404-013-2955-0. Epub 2013 Jul 11.
3
2012 updated consensus guidelines for the management of abnormal cervical cancer screening tests and cancer precursors.2012 年更新的异常宫颈癌筛查试验和癌前病变管理共识指南。
Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Apr;121(4):829-846. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182883a34.
4
Increased risk of preterm birth after treatment for CIN.CIN治疗后早产风险增加。
BMJ. 2012 Sep 4;345:e5847. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e5847.
5
The risk of preterm birth following treatment for precancerous changes in the cervix: a systematic review and meta-analysis.治疗宫颈癌前病变后早产的风险:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BJOG. 2011 Aug;118(9):1031-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.02944.x. Epub 2011 Mar 30.
6
Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia outcomes after treatment: long-term follow-up from the British Columbia Cohort Study.治疗后宫颈上皮内瘤变的结局:不列颠哥伦比亚队列研究的长期随访
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009 May 20;101(10):721-8. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp089. Epub 2009 May 12.
7
Perinatal mortality and other severe adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: meta-analysis.围产期死亡率及与宫颈上皮内瘤变治疗相关的其他严重不良妊娠结局:荟萃分析
BMJ. 2008 Sep 18;337:a1284. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a1284.
8
Have we dismissed ablative treatment too soon in colposcopy practice?在阴道镜检查实践中,我们是否过早摒弃了消融治疗?
BJOG. 2007 Jan;114(1):3-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01178.x.
9
The up-to-date evidence on colposcopy practice and treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: the Cochrane colposcopy & cervical cytopathology collaborative group (C5 group) approach.阴道镜检查实践与宫颈上皮内瘤变治疗的最新证据:Cochrane阴道镜检查与宫颈细胞病理学协作组(C5组)方法
Cancer Treat Rev. 2006 Nov;32(7):516-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2006.07.008. Epub 2006 Sep 27.
10
Obstetric outcomes after conservative treatment for intraepithelial or early invasive cervical lesions: systematic review and meta-analysis.宫颈上皮内或早期浸润性病变保守治疗后的产科结局:系统评价与Meta分析
Lancet. 2006 Feb 11;367(9509):489-98. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68181-6.

宫颈前病变的治疗:回归基础。

Treatment of cervical precancers: back to basics.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama; and the Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Jun;123(6):1339-1343. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000287.

DOI:10.1097/AOG.0000000000000287
PMID:24807323
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4077778/
Abstract

Both ablative (cervical cryotherapy, laser ablation) and excisional methods (loop electrosurgical excision procedure, cold knife conization) can be effective at treating cervical precancer. Excisional procedures are associated with adverse obstetric outcomes including preterm delivery and perinatal mortality with the depth of excision potentially contributing to the adverse outcomes. Ablative therapies are now used much less commonly than loop electrosurgical excision procedure but have less of an effect on adverse obstetric outcomes and hence are effective alternatives for treating cervical precancer in reproductive-aged women. Morphometric data indicate that the vast majority of precancerous lesions are less than 5 mm deep, suggesting that treatments that reach 6-7 mm below the epithelium are adequate in women with satisfactory colposcopy. Cone biopsies, "top-hat" loop electrosurgical excision procedures, or the use of loop electrodes greater than 10 mm are therefore unnecessary for the majority of reproductive-aged women and increase risk of adverse obstetric outcomes. New consensus guidelines allow observation instead of treatment in appropriately selected young women. Until the association of excisional methods with adverse obstetric outcomes is clarified with more data, ablative methods should be revitalized and used by health care providers in appropriately selected patients. Treatment should be individualized based on patient's age, fertility desires, and colpopathologic findings.

摘要

消融(宫颈冷冻疗法、激光消融)和切除(环形电切术、冷刀锥切术)方法均可有效治疗宫颈癌前病变。切除方法与不良产科结局相关,包括早产和围产儿死亡,切除的深度可能导致不良结局。现在,消融疗法比环形电切术使用得少得多,但对不良产科结局的影响较小,因此是治疗育龄妇女宫颈癌前病变的有效替代方法。形态计量学数据表明,绝大多数癌前病变的深度小于 5 毫米,这表明对于阴道镜检查满意的女性,达到上皮下 6-7 毫米的治疗就足够了。因此,对于大多数育龄妇女来说,锥形活检、“帽子”环形电切术或使用大于 10 毫米的环形电极是不必要的,并且会增加不良产科结局的风险。新的共识指南允许在适当选择的年轻女性中进行观察而不是治疗。在更多数据阐明切除方法与不良产科结局的关联之前,消融方法应得到复兴,并由医疗保健提供者在适当选择的患者中使用。治疗应根据患者的年龄、生育愿望和阴道镜病理检查结果个体化。