Salacinski Amanda J, Alford Micah, Drevets Kathryn, Hart Sarah, Hunt Brian E
Department of Kinesiology and Physical Education, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, IL, USA
Department of Applied Health Science, Wheaton College, Wheaton, IL, USA.
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2014 Jan;8(1):95-99. doi: 10.1177/1932296813514315. Epub 2014 Jan 1.
As an appealing alternative to reference glucose analyzers, portable glucometers are recommended for self-monitoring at home, in the field, and in research settings. The purpose was to characterize the accuracy and precision, and bias of glucometers in biomedical research. Fifteen young (20-36 years; mean = 24.5), moderately to highly active men (n = 10) and women (n = 5), defined by exercising 2 to 3 times a week for the past 6 months, were given an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) after an overnight fast. Participants ingested 50, 75, or 150 grams of glucose over a 5-minute period. The glucometer was compared to a reference instrument. The glucometer had 39% of values within 15% of measurements made using the reference instrument ranging from 45.05 to 169.37 mg/dl. There was both a proportional (-0.45 to -0.39) and small fixed (5.06 and 0.90 mg/dl) bias. Results of the present study suggest that the glucometer provided poor validity and reliability results compared to the results provided by the reference laboratory analyzer. The portable glucometers should be used for patient management, but not for diagnosis, treatment, or research purposes.
作为参考血糖仪的一种有吸引力的替代方案,便携式血糖仪被推荐用于家庭、野外和研究环境中的自我监测。目的是在生物医学研究中表征血糖仪的准确性、精密度和偏差。15名年轻(20 - 36岁;平均 = 24.5岁)、中度至高度活跃的男性(n = 10)和女性(n = 5),他们在过去6个月每周锻炼2至3次,在空腹过夜后进行口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT)。参与者在5分钟内摄入50、75或150克葡萄糖。将血糖仪与参考仪器进行比较。血糖仪在使用参考仪器测量值的15%范围内的数值占39%,测量值范围为45.05至169.37毫克/分升。存在比例偏差(-0.45至-0.39)和小的固定偏差(5.06和0.90毫克/分升)。本研究结果表明,与参考实验室分析仪提供的结果相比,血糖仪的有效性和可靠性结果较差。便携式血糖仪应用于患者管理,但不适用于诊断、治疗或研究目的。