• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“送玫瑰”与“送亲吻”的区别:对轻动词结构的持续神经活动。

The difference between "giving a rose" and "giving a kiss": Sustained neural activity to the light verb construction.

作者信息

Wittenberg Eva, Paczynski Martin, Wiese Heike, Jackendoff Ray, Kuperberg Gina

机构信息

Tufts University, United States ; Potsdam University, Germany.

Tufts University, United States.

出版信息

J Mem Lang. 2014 May;73:31-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2014.02.002.

DOI:10.1016/j.jml.2014.02.002
PMID:24910498
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4045490/
Abstract

We used event-related potentials (ERPs) to investigate the neurocognitive mechanisms associated with processing light verb constructions such as "give a kiss". These constructions consist of a semantically underspecified light verb ("give") and an event nominal that contributes most of the meaning and also activates an argument structure of its own ("kiss"). This creates a mismatch between the syntactic constituents and the semantic roles of a sentence. Native speakers read German verb-final sentences that contained light verb constructions (e.g., "Julius gave Anne a kiss"), non-light constructions (e.g., "Julius gave Anne a rose"), and semantically anomalous constructions (e.g., *"Julius gave Anne a conversation"). ERPs were measured at the critical verb, which appeared after all its arguments. Compared to non-light constructions, the light verb constructions evoked a widely distributed, frontally focused, sustained negative-going effect between 500 and 900 ms after verb onset. We interpret this effect as reflecting working memory costs associated with complex semantic processes that establish a shared argument structure in the light verb constructions.

摘要

我们使用事件相关电位(ERP)来研究与处理诸如“give a kiss”这类轻动词结构相关的神经认知机制。这些结构由一个语义欠明确的轻动词(“give”)和一个贡献了大部分意义且自身还激活了一个论元结构的事件名词(“kiss”)组成。这就造成了句子的句法成分和语义角色之间的不匹配。以德语为母语的人阅读包含轻动词结构(例如,“Julius gave Anne a kiss”)、非轻动词结构(例如,“Julius gave Anne a rose”)和语义异常结构(例如,*“Julius gave Anne a conversation”)的德语动词后置句。ERP在关键动词处进行测量,该动词出现在其所有论元之后。与非轻动词结构相比,轻动词结构在动词出现后500至900毫秒之间引发了一种广泛分布、以额叶为中心、持续的负向效应。我们将这种效应解释为反映了与复杂语义过程相关的工作记忆成本这些复杂语义过程在轻动词结构中建立了共享论元结构。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f6d/4045490/a646acc6ca39/nihms-570814-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f6d/4045490/b6ae0012fc28/nihms-570814-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f6d/4045490/a646acc6ca39/nihms-570814-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f6d/4045490/b6ae0012fc28/nihms-570814-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f6d/4045490/a646acc6ca39/nihms-570814-f0002.jpg

相似文献

1
The difference between "giving a rose" and "giving a kiss": Sustained neural activity to the light verb construction.“送玫瑰”与“送亲吻”的区别:对轻动词结构的持续神经活动。
J Mem Lang. 2014 May;73:31-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2014.02.002.
2
Investigating Thematic Roles through Implicit Learning: Evidence from Light Verb Constructions.通过内隐学习研究题元角色:来自轻动词结构的证据。
Front Psychol. 2017 Jun 30;8:1089. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01089. eCollection 2017.
3
How Do French-English Bilinguals Pull Verb Particle Constructions Off? Factors Influencing Second Language Processing of Unfamiliar Structures at the Syntax-Semantics Interface.法英双语者如何处理动词短语结构?在句法-语义接口处影响不熟悉结构的第二语言加工的因素。
Front Psychol. 2018 Oct 17;9:1885. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01885. eCollection 2018.
4
Effects of syntactic and semantic argument structure on sentence repetition in agrammatism: Things we can learn from particles and prepositions.句法和语义论元结构对语法缺失症中句子重复的影响:我们可以从小品词和介词中学到的东西。
Aphasiology. 2011;25(6-7):736-747. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2010.537348. Epub 2011 Jan 10.
5
Multiple semantic processes at different levels of syntactic hierarchy: does the higher-level process proceed in face of a lower-level failure?多层次句法结构中的多种语义加工过程:高层加工过程是否会在底层加工失败的情况下进行?
Neuropsychologia. 2012 Jul;50(8):1918-28. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.04.016. Epub 2012 Apr 26.
6
Semantic integration processes at different levels of syntactic hierarchy during sentence comprehension: an ERP study.句法语义层次不同水平上的句子理解中的语义整合过程:一项 ERP 研究。
Neuropsychologia. 2010 May;48(6):1551-62. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.02.001. Epub 2010 Feb 6.
7
The semantic processing of syntactic structure in sentence comprehension: an ERP study.句子理解中句法结构的语义加工:一项事件相关电位研究
Brain Res. 2007 Apr 20;1142:135-45. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.01.030. Epub 2007 Jan 18.
8
If you want a quick kiss, make it count: How choice of syntactic construction affects event construal.如果你想要一个匆匆的吻,那就让它有意义:句法结构的选择如何影响事件的理解。
J Mem Lang. 2017 Jun;94:254-271. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2016.12.001. Epub 2017 Jan 18.
9
Local and global semantic integration in an argument structure: ERP evidence from Korean.论证结构中的局部与全局语义整合:来自韩语的ERP证据
Brain Res. 2016 Jul 1;1642:590-602. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2016.04.037. Epub 2016 Apr 16.
10
The relation between thematic role computing and semantic relatedness processing during on-line sentence comprehension.在线句子理解过程中题元角色计算与语义相关性处理之间的关系。
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 22;9(4):e95834. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0095834. eCollection 2014.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding words in context: A naturalistic EEG study of children's lexical processing.语境中理解单词:一项关于儿童词汇加工的自然主义脑电图研究。
J Mem Lang. 2024 Aug;137. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2024.104512. Epub 2024 Mar 8.
2
Understanding Temporal Relations in Mandarin Chinese: An ERP Investigation.理解汉语中的时间关系:一项事件相关电位研究
Brain Sci. 2022 Apr 3;12(4):474. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12040474.
3
Processing Aspectual Agreement in an Inflexionless Language: An ERP Study of Mandarin Chinese.无屈折语中体貌一致关系的处理:一项关于汉语普通话的事件相关电位研究

本文引用的文献

1
When events change their nature: the neurocognitive mechanisms underlying aspectual coercion.当事件改变其性质:体貌强制背后的神经认知机制。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2014 Sep;26(9):1905-17. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00638. Epub 2014 Apr 4.
2
Bridging the Gap: Evidence from ERPs on the Processing of Unbounded Dependencies.弥合差距:来自 ERP 研究的关于无界依存关系处理的证据。
J Cogn Neurosci. 1993 Spring;5(2):196-214. doi: 10.1162/jocn.1993.5.2.196.
3
Who Did What and When? Using Word- and Clause-Level ERPs to Monitor Working Memory Usage in Reading.
Brain Sci. 2021 Sep 18;11(9):1236. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11091236.
4
Thematic and other semantic relations central to abstract (and concrete) concepts.与抽象(和具体)概念相关的主题和其他语义关系。
Psychol Res. 2022 Nov;86(8):2399-2416. doi: 10.1007/s00426-021-01484-8. Epub 2021 Jun 11.
5
A starring role for inference in the neurocognition of visual narratives.推理在视觉叙事的神经认知中的重要作用。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2021 Feb 15;6(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s41235-021-00270-9.
6
Quasi-compositional mapping from form to meaning: a neural network-based approach to capturing neural responses during human language comprehension.从形式到意义的准组合映射:一种基于神经网络的方法,用于捕获人类语言理解过程中的神经反应。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2020 Feb 3;375(1791):20190313. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0313. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
7
If you want a quick kiss, make it count: How choice of syntactic construction affects event construal.如果你想要一个匆匆的吻,那就让它有意义:句法结构的选择如何影响事件的理解。
J Mem Lang. 2017 Jun;94:254-271. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2016.12.001. Epub 2017 Jan 18.
8
Your Brain on Comics: A Cognitive Model of Visual Narrative Comprehension.漫画中的大脑:视觉叙事理解的认知模型。
Top Cogn Sci. 2020 Jan;12(1):352-386. doi: 10.1111/tops.12421. Epub 2019 Apr 8.
9
When Proactivity Fails: An Electrophysiological Study of Establishing Reference in Schizophrenia.当主动性失败:精神分裂症中建立参照的电生理研究。
Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2018 Jan;3(1):77-87. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2017.09.007. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
10
Investigating Thematic Roles through Implicit Learning: Evidence from Light Verb Constructions.通过内隐学习研究题元角色:来自轻动词结构的证据。
Front Psychol. 2017 Jun 30;8:1089. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01089. eCollection 2017.
谁在何时做了什么?使用词和子句水平的事件相关电位来监测阅读中的工作记忆使用情况。
J Cogn Neurosci. 1995 Summer;7(3):376-95. doi: 10.1162/jocn.1995.7.3.376.
4
Multiple Influences of Semantic Memory on Sentence Processing: Distinct Effects of Semantic Relatedness on Violations of Real-World Event/State Knowledge and Animacy Selection Restrictions.语义记忆对句子处理的多重影响:语义相关性对违背现实世界事件/状态知识及生命性选择限制的不同作用。
J Mem Lang. 2012 Nov 1;67(4):426-448. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.07.003. Epub 2012 Sep 6.
5
So that's what you meant! Event-related potentials reveal multiple aspects of context use during construction of message-level meaning.原来你是这个意思!事件相关电位揭示了在构建信息层面意义时上下文使用的多个方面。
Neuroimage. 2012 Aug 1;62(1):356-66. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.04.054. Epub 2012 May 4.
6
Electrophysiological Evidence for Use of the Animacy Hierarchy, but not Thematic Role Assignment, During Verb Argument Processing.动词论元处理过程中使用生命度层级而非题元角色分配的电生理证据。
Lang Cogn Process. 2011;26(9):1402-1456. doi: 10.1080/01690965.2011.580143.
7
Thirty years and counting: finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP).三十年的探索:事件相关脑电位(ERP)中 N400 成分的意义发现。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2011;62:621-47. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.131123.
8
Electrophysiological correlates of complement coercion.补体胁迫的电生理相关性。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2010 Dec;22(12):2685-701. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21333.
9
Coercion and compositionality.强制与成分性。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2010 Sep;22(9):2131-40. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21303.
10
Distinct processing of function verb categories in the human brain.人类大脑中功能动词类别的独特处理方式。
Brain Res. 2009 Jan 16;1249:173-80. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.10.027. Epub 2008 Oct 28.