Naylor Mary D, Hirschman Karen B, Hanlon Alexandra L, Bowles Kathryn H, Bradway Christine, McCauley Kathleen M, Pauly Mark V
NewCourtland Center for Transitions & Health, University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
J Comp Eff Res. 2014 May;3(3):245-57. doi: 10.2217/cer.14.14.
This article reports the effects of three evidence-based interventions of varying intensity, each designed to improve outcomes of hospitalized cognitively impaired older adults.
MATERIALS & METHODS: In this comparative effectiveness study, 202 older adults with cognitive impairment (assessed within 24 h of index hospitalization) were enrolled at one of three hospitals within an academic health system. Each hospital was randomly assigned one of the following interventions: Augmented Standard Care (ASC; lower dose: n = 65), Resource Nurse Care (RNC; medium dose: n = 71) or the Transitional Care Model (TCM; higher dose: n = 66). Since randomization at the patient level was not feasible due to potential contamination, generalized boosted modeling that estimated multigroup propensity score weights was used to balance baseline patient characteristics between groups. Analyses compared the three groups on time with first rehospitalization or death, the number and days of all-cause rehospitalizations per patient and functional status through 6-month postindex hospitalization.
In total, 25% of the ASC group were rehospitalized or died by day 33 compared with day 58 for the RNC group versus day 83 for the TCM group. The largest differences between the three groups on time to rehospitalization or death were observed early in the Kaplan-Meier curve (at 30 days: ASC = 22% vs RNC = 19% vs TCM = 9%). The TCM group also demonstrated lower mean rehospitalization rates per patient compared with the RNC (p < 0.001) and ASC groups (p = 0.06) at 30 days. At 90-day postindex hospitalization, the TCM group continued to demonstrate lower mean rehospitalization rates per patient only when compared with the ASC group (p = 0.02). No significant group differences in functional status were observed.
Findings suggest that the TCM intervention, compared with interventions of lower intensity, has the potential to decrease costly resource use outcomes in the immediate postindex hospitalization period among cognitively impaired older adults.
本文报告了三种不同强度的循证干预措施的效果,每种措施都旨在改善住院认知障碍老年人的治疗结果。
在这项比较效果研究中,202名认知障碍老年人(在首次住院24小时内进行评估)在一个学术医疗系统内的三家医院之一入组。每家医院被随机分配以下干预措施之一:强化标准护理(ASC;低剂量:n = 65)、资源护士护理(RNC;中等剂量:n = 71)或过渡护理模式(TCM;高剂量:n = 66)。由于存在潜在污染,患者层面的随机分组不可行,因此使用估计多组倾向得分权重的广义增强模型来平衡组间患者的基线特征。分析比较了三组患者首次再住院或死亡的时间、每位患者全因再住院的次数和天数,以及首次住院后6个月的功能状态。
ASC组中有25%的患者在第33天再次住院或死亡,而RNC组为第58天,TCM组为第83天。在Kaplan-Meier曲线早期观察到三组在再住院或死亡时间上的最大差异(30天时:ASC = 22%,RNC = 19%,TCM = 9%)。在30天时,TCM组每位患者的平均再住院率也低于RNC组(p < 0.001)和ASC组(p = 0.06)。在首次住院后90天时,仅与ASC组相比,TCM组每位患者的平均再住院率继续较低(p = 0.02)。在功能状态方面未观察到显著的组间差异。
研究结果表明,与低强度干预措施相比,TCM干预措施有可能在认知障碍老年人首次住院后的近期内降低昂贵的资源使用结果。