Suppr超能文献

幼儿期与新发精神病理学中偏离可预期环境的情况。

Deviations from the expectable environment in early childhood and emerging psychopathology.

作者信息

Humphreys Kathryn L, Zeanah Charles H

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA.

出版信息

Neuropsychopharmacology. 2015 Jan;40(1):154-70. doi: 10.1038/npp.2014.165. Epub 2014 Jul 7.

Abstract

Current frameworks for understanding the link between early adverse childhood experiences and later negative life outcomes, including psychopathology, focus on the mediating negative impact on brain and biological systems in the developing child resulting broadly from stress and trauma. Although this approach is useful, we argue that the framework could be functionally extended by distinguishing the effects of two different types of abnormal input, both deviations from the expectable environment in early childhood. Specifically, we review the consequences of inadequate input (eg, neglect/deprivation) and harmful input (eg, abuse/trauma) on brain and biological development. We then review evidence on the differential links between each type of abnormal input to four selected domains of psychopathology (indiscriminate social behavior, posttraumatic stress disorder, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, and conduct problems), and consider potential mechanisms for inadequate and harmful input to lead to these outcomes. We conclude that the careful consideration of the type of deviation from the expected environment, while acknowledging the practical difficulties in assessing this, is likely to lead to clearer understanding of the mechanism of risk for psychopathology, and that tailored approaches to prevention and intervention may be informed by considering the unique consequences of inadequate and harmful input when experienced in early childhood.

摘要

当前用于理解儿童早期不良经历与后期负面生活结果(包括精神病理学)之间联系的框架,主要关注压力和创伤对发育中儿童大脑及生物系统产生的中介性负面影响。尽管这种方法很有用,但我们认为,通过区分两种不同类型的异常输入(均为幼儿期与预期环境的偏差)的影响,该框架在功能上可以得到扩展。具体而言,我们回顾了输入不足(如忽视/剥夺)和有害输入(如虐待/创伤)对大脑和生物发育的影响。然后,我们回顾了关于每种异常输入与精神病理学四个选定领域(不加选择的社交行为、创伤后应激障碍、注意力缺陷多动障碍和品行问题)之间差异联系的证据,并考虑了输入不足和有害输入导致这些结果的潜在机制。我们得出结论,在认识到评估这种偏差存在实际困难的同时,仔细考虑与预期环境的偏差类型,可能会使我们更清楚地理解精神病理学的风险机制,并且考虑到幼儿期经历输入不足和有害输入的独特后果,可能会为预防和干预的针对性方法提供依据。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

7
Dimensions of early experience and neural development: deprivation and threat.早期经历与神经发育的维度:剥夺与威胁。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2014 Nov;18(11):580-585. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2014.09.001. Epub 2014 Oct 7.
10
The Neurobiological Toll of Early Human Deprivation.早期人类剥夺的神经生物学代价。
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2011 Dec;76(4):127-146. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5834.2011.00630.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验