Suppr超能文献

短眼轴长度眼睛的人工晶状体度数计算

Intraocular lens power calculation in eyes with short axial length.

作者信息

Moschos Marilita M, Chatziralli Irini P, Koutsandrea Chryssanthi

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Electrophysiology Laboratory, University of Athens, Athens, Greece.

出版信息

Indian J Ophthalmol. 2014 Jun;62(6):692-4. doi: 10.4103/0301-4738.129791.

Abstract

AIM

To evaluate and compare the predictive capacity of four intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas (SRK/T, Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, and Haigis) in eyes shorter than 22.0 mm.

SETTING AND DESIGN

Observational study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Participants in our study were 69 consecutive patients with a preoperative axial length (AL) of less than 22.0 mm in one or both eyes. All patients underwent phacoemulsification with IOL implantation and postoperative target of refraction was analyzed. Specifically, the differences in the mean absolute estimation error (AE) for the four formulas were analyzed. Furthermore, the percentage of eyes with AE within ± 0.5 and ± 1.0 D for each formula was estimated, as well as the correlation coefficient (r) between the AL and estimation error (E) for each formula. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare differences in the AEs of the formulas. A statistically significant difference was defined as P < 0.05.

RESULTS

The Haigis formula had statistically significant smaller mean AE in comparison to Holladay 1, Hoffer Q, and SRK/T. The Haigis formula predicted more eyes with E within ± 0.5 and ± 1.0 D of predicted spherical equivalent compared to other formulas. Correlation between AL and AE revealed a negative r value and P < 0.05 for all formulas.

CONCLUSIONS

Haigis formula provides more accurate results concerning the postoperative target of refraction in eyes with AL less than 22.0 mm. Hoffer Q could be also used as an alternative.

摘要

目的

评估并比较四种人工晶状体(IOL)屈光力计算公式(SRK/T、霍夫尔Q、霍拉迪1和海吉斯)在眼轴长度小于22.0 mm的眼中的预测能力。

设置与设计

观察性研究。

材料与方法

我们研究的参与者为69例连续患者,其一只或两只眼睛术前眼轴长度(AL)小于22.0 mm。所有患者均接受了白内障超声乳化吸除联合IOL植入术,并分析了术后屈光目标。具体而言,分析了这四种公式的平均绝对估计误差(AE)的差异。此外,还估计了每个公式AE在±0.5 D和±1.0 D范围内的眼的百分比,以及每个公式的AL与估计误差(E)之间的相关系数(r)。采用曼-惠特尼U检验比较各公式AE的差异。具有统计学意义的差异定义为P<0.05。

结果

与霍拉迪1、霍夫尔Q和SRK/T相比,海吉斯公式的平均AE在统计学上显著更小。与其他公式相比,海吉斯公式预测的更多眼睛的E在预测球镜等效值的±0.5 D和±1.0 D范围内。所有公式的AL与AE之间的相关性显示r值为负且P<0.05。

结论

对于眼轴长度小于22.0 mm的眼睛,海吉斯公式在术后屈光目标方面提供了更准确的结果。霍夫尔Q也可作为一种替代方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce61/4131320/746a628c3478/IJO-62-692-g003.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验