• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

短眼轴长度眼睛的人工晶状体度数计算

Intraocular lens power calculation in eyes with short axial length.

作者信息

Moschos Marilita M, Chatziralli Irini P, Koutsandrea Chryssanthi

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Electrophysiology Laboratory, University of Athens, Athens, Greece.

出版信息

Indian J Ophthalmol. 2014 Jun;62(6):692-4. doi: 10.4103/0301-4738.129791.

DOI:10.4103/0301-4738.129791
PMID:25005197
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4131320/
Abstract

AIM

To evaluate and compare the predictive capacity of four intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas (SRK/T, Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, and Haigis) in eyes shorter than 22.0 mm.

SETTING AND DESIGN

Observational study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Participants in our study were 69 consecutive patients with a preoperative axial length (AL) of less than 22.0 mm in one or both eyes. All patients underwent phacoemulsification with IOL implantation and postoperative target of refraction was analyzed. Specifically, the differences in the mean absolute estimation error (AE) for the four formulas were analyzed. Furthermore, the percentage of eyes with AE within ± 0.5 and ± 1.0 D for each formula was estimated, as well as the correlation coefficient (r) between the AL and estimation error (E) for each formula. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare differences in the AEs of the formulas. A statistically significant difference was defined as P < 0.05.

RESULTS

The Haigis formula had statistically significant smaller mean AE in comparison to Holladay 1, Hoffer Q, and SRK/T. The Haigis formula predicted more eyes with E within ± 0.5 and ± 1.0 D of predicted spherical equivalent compared to other formulas. Correlation between AL and AE revealed a negative r value and P < 0.05 for all formulas.

CONCLUSIONS

Haigis formula provides more accurate results concerning the postoperative target of refraction in eyes with AL less than 22.0 mm. Hoffer Q could be also used as an alternative.

摘要

目的

评估并比较四种人工晶状体(IOL)屈光力计算公式(SRK/T、霍夫尔Q、霍拉迪1和海吉斯)在眼轴长度小于22.0 mm的眼中的预测能力。

设置与设计

观察性研究。

材料与方法

我们研究的参与者为69例连续患者,其一只或两只眼睛术前眼轴长度(AL)小于22.0 mm。所有患者均接受了白内障超声乳化吸除联合IOL植入术,并分析了术后屈光目标。具体而言,分析了这四种公式的平均绝对估计误差(AE)的差异。此外,还估计了每个公式AE在±0.5 D和±1.0 D范围内的眼的百分比,以及每个公式的AL与估计误差(E)之间的相关系数(r)。采用曼-惠特尼U检验比较各公式AE的差异。具有统计学意义的差异定义为P<0.05。

结果

与霍拉迪1、霍夫尔Q和SRK/T相比,海吉斯公式的平均AE在统计学上显著更小。与其他公式相比,海吉斯公式预测的更多眼睛的E在预测球镜等效值的±0.5 D和±1.0 D范围内。所有公式的AL与AE之间的相关性显示r值为负且P<0.05。

结论

对于眼轴长度小于22.0 mm的眼睛,海吉斯公式在术后屈光目标方面提供了更准确的结果。霍夫尔Q也可作为一种替代方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce61/4131320/746a628c3478/IJO-62-692-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce61/4131320/746a628c3478/IJO-62-692-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce61/4131320/746a628c3478/IJO-62-692-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Intraocular lens power calculation in eyes with short axial length.短眼轴长度眼睛的人工晶状体度数计算
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2014 Jun;62(6):692-4. doi: 10.4103/0301-4738.129791.
2
[Intraocular lens power calculation for high myopic eyes with cataract: comparison of three formulas].[白内障高度近视眼人工晶状体屈光度计算:三种公式的比较]
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Apr 11;53(4):260-265. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0412-4081.2017.04.007.
3
A Comparative Study to Assess the Predictability of Different IOL Power Calculation Formulas in Eyes of Short and Long Axial Length.一项比较研究,旨在评估不同人工晶状体屈光力计算公式在短眼轴和长眼轴眼中的预测性。
J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Jan;11(1):NC01-NC04. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/22095.9136. Epub 2017 Jan 1.
4
Accuracy of intraocular lens calculation formulas in cataract patients with steep corneal curvature.在角膜曲率陡峭的白内障患者中,人工晶状体计算公式的准确性。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 20;15(11):e0241630. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241630. eCollection 2020.
5
Effect of anterior chamber depth on the choice of intraocular lens calculation formula in patients with normal axial length.前房深度对眼轴长度正常患者人工晶状体计算公式选择的影响
Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2014 Oct-Dec;21(4):307-11. doi: 10.4103/0974-9233.142266.
6
The effect of ocular biometric factors on the accuracy of various IOL power calculation formulas.眼部生物测量因素对各种人工晶状体屈光力计算公式准确性的影响。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2017 May 2;17(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s12886-017-0454-y.
7
[The analysis of refractive error of long axial high myopic eyes after IOL implantation].[人工晶状体植入术后长轴高度近视眼屈光不正的分析]
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2015 Apr;51(4):276-81.
8
Predictability of intraocular lens power calculation formulae in infantile eyes with unilateral congenital cataract: results from the Infant Aphakia Treatment Study.婴幼儿白内障眼人工晶状体计算公式的预测性:婴儿无晶状体治疗研究的结果。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2013 Dec;156(6):1252-1260.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2013.07.014. Epub 2013 Sep 4.
9
Intraocular lens power calculation using IOLMaster and various formulas in short eyes.使用IOLMaster及多种公式计算短眼的人工晶状体度数
Korean J Ophthalmol. 2011 Jun;25(3):151-5. doi: 10.3341/kjo.2011.25.3.151. Epub 2011 May 24.
10
Assessment of the accuracy of new and updated intraocular lens power calculation formulas in 10 930 eyes from the UK National Health Service.评估英国国家医疗服务体系 10930 只眼中新型和更新的人工晶状体计算公式的准确性。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2020 Jan;46(1):2-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2019.08.014.

引用本文的文献

1
[Evidence-based approach for premium intraocular lenses: management of postoperative dissatisfaction].[基于证据的高端人工晶状体方法:术后不满意的处理]
Ophthalmologie. 2025 Jun 13. doi: 10.1007/s00347-025-02253-3.
2
Evaluation of prediction errors in nine intraocular lens calculation formulas using an explainable machine learning model.使用可解释机器学习模型评估九种人工晶状体计算公式中的预测误差。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2024 Dec 19;24(1):531. doi: 10.1186/s12886-024-03801-2.
3
Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas-A Systematic Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Optimizing intraocular lens power calculations in eyes with axial lengths above 25.0 mm.优化眼轴长度大于 25.0 毫米的眼中的人工晶状体屈光力计算。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011 Nov;37(11):2018-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.05.042.
2
Intraocular lens power calculation using IOLMaster and various formulas in short eyes.使用IOLMaster及多种公式计算短眼的人工晶状体度数
Korean J Ophthalmol. 2011 Jun;25(3):151-5. doi: 10.3341/kjo.2011.25.3.151. Epub 2011 May 24.
3
Intraocular lens calculation accuracy limits in normal eyes.正常眼内人工晶状体计算的精度限制
人工晶状体屈光度计算公式——系统评价
Ophthalmol Ther. 2023 Dec;12(6):2881-2902. doi: 10.1007/s40123-023-00799-6. Epub 2023 Sep 12.
4
Refractive outcomes after immediate primary phacoemulsification for acute primary angle closure.急性原发性闭角型青光眼行即刻原发性超声乳化白内障吸除术后的屈光结果。
Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 16;13(1):13283. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-40585-9.
5
Residual refractive errors in pseudophakic eyes and related factors: a population-based study.人工晶状体眼的残余屈光不正及其相关因素:一项基于人群的研究。
Int J Ophthalmol. 2023 May 18;16(5):778-786. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2023.05.16. eCollection 2023.
6
Accuracy of IOL Power Calculation Formulas for AcrySof SN60WF versus Tecnis ZCB00 Intraocular Lenses.用于AcrySof SN60WF与Tecnis ZCB00人工晶状体的人工晶状体屈光度计算公式的准确性。
J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2022 Aug 15;17(3):344-352. doi: 10.18502/jovr.v17i3.11571. eCollection 2022 Jul-Sep.
7
Effectiveness, Sensitivity, and Specificity of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas for Short Eyes.短眼的人工晶状体计算公式的有效性、敏感性和特异性。
Turk J Ophthalmol. 2022 Jun 29;52(3):201-207. doi: 10.4274/tjo.galenos.2021.83704.
8
Comparing the accuracy of new intraocular lens power calculation formulae in short eyes after cataract surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.比较白内障手术后短眼的新人工晶状体计算公式的准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int Ophthalmol. 2022 Jun;42(6):1939-1956. doi: 10.1007/s10792-021-02191-4. Epub 2022 Jan 26.
9
Recurring themes during cataract assessment and surgery.白内障评估和手术中的反复出现的主题。
Eye (Lond). 2021 Sep;35(9):2482-2498. doi: 10.1038/s41433-021-01548-4. Epub 2021 Apr 29.
10
Changes in the Ocular Parameters of Patients with Graves' Disease after Antithyroid Drug Treatment.抗甲状腺药物治疗后Graves病患者眼部参数的变化
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Apr 25;57(5):414. doi: 10.3390/medicina57050414.
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008 May;34(5):802-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.01.015.
4
Biometry and intraocular lens power calculation.生物测量与人工晶状体屈光度计算
Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2008 Jan;19(1):13-7. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0b013e3282f1c5ad.
5
Biometry and formula accuracy with intraocular lenses used for cataract surgery in extreme hyperopia.用于极端远视白内障手术的人工晶状体的生物测量与公式准确性
Am J Ophthalmol. 2007 Jun;143(6):920-931. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2007.02.043.
6
Intraocular lens power calculation in short eyes.短眼的人工晶状体屈光度计算
Eye (Lond). 2008 Jul;22(7):935-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6702774. Epub 2007 Mar 16.
7
Accuracy of intraocular lens power prediction using the Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, Holladay 2, and SRK/T formulas.使用霍弗Q公式、霍拉迪1公式、霍拉迪2公式和SRK/T公式预测人工晶状体屈光度的准确性。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006 Dec;32(12):2050-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.09.009.
8
Refractive and visual outcome of hyperopic cataract cases operated on before and after implementation of the Holladay II formula.实施霍拉迪II公式前后接受手术的远视性白内障病例的屈光和视觉结果。
Ophthalmology. 1998 Sep;105(9):1759-64. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(98)99050-9.
9
Accuracy of the newer generation intraocular lens power calculation formulas in long and short eyes.新一代人工晶状体屈光力计算公式在长眼和短眼中的准确性。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 1991 Mar;17(2):187-93. doi: 10.1016/s0886-3350(13)80249-0.