Suppr超能文献

动物园还是大草原?循证药物警戒的训练场选择

Zoo or savannah? Choice of training ground for evidence-based pharmacovigilance.

作者信息

Norén G Niklas, Caster Ola, Juhlin Kristina, Lindquist Marie

机构信息

Uppsala Monitoring Centre, WHO Collaborating Centre for International Drug Monitoring, Box 1051, 751 40, Uppsala, Sweden,

出版信息

Drug Saf. 2014 Sep;37(9):655-9. doi: 10.1007/s40264-014-0198-z.

Abstract

Pharmacovigilance seeks to detect and describe adverse drug reactions early. Ideally, we would like to see objective evidence that a chosen signal detection approach can be expected to be effective. The development and evaluation of evidence-based methods require benchmarks for signal detection performance, and recent years have seen unprecedented efforts to build such reference sets. Here, we argue that evaluation should be made against emerging and not established adverse drug reactions, and we present real-world examples that illustrate the relevance of this to pharmacovigilance methods development for both individual case reports and longitudinal health records. The establishment of broader reference sets of emerging safety signals must be made a top priority to achieve more effective pharmacovigilance methods development and evaluation.

摘要

药物警戒旨在尽早发现和描述药物不良反应。理想情况下,我们希望看到客观证据,表明所选的信号检测方法有望有效。基于证据的方法的开发和评估需要信号检测性能的基准,近年来人们为建立此类参考集付出了前所未有的努力。在此,我们认为评估应针对新出现的而非已确定的药物不良反应进行,并且我们提供了实际案例,以说明这对于个体病例报告和纵向健康记录的药物警戒方法开发的相关性。必须将建立更广泛的新出现安全信号参考集作为首要任务,以实现更有效的药物警戒方法开发和评估。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验