Rasmussen Andrew, Ventevogel Peter, Sancilio Amelia, Eggerman Mark, Panter-Brick Catherine
Fordham University, Dealy Hall 226, 441 East Fordham Rd, Bronx, NY 11215, USA.
BMC Psychiatry. 2014 Jul 18;14:206. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-14-206.
The relative performance of local and international assessment instruments is subject to ongoing discussion in transcultural research on mental health and psychosocial support. We examined the construct and external validity of two instruments, one developed for use in Afghanistan, the other developed by the World Health Organization for use in resource-poor settings.
We used data collected on 1003 Afghan adults (500 men, 503 women) randomly sampled at three sites in Afghanistan. We compared the 22-item Afghan Symptom Checklist (ASCL), a culturally-grounded assessment of psychosocial wellbeing, with Pashto and Dari versions of the 20-item Self-Reporting Questionnaire (SRQ-20). We derived subscales using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses (EFA and CFA) and tested total and subscale scores for external validity with respect to lifetime trauma and household wealth using block model regressions.
EFA suggested a three-factor structure for SRQ-20--somatic complaints, negative affect, and emotional numbing--and a two-factor structure for ASCL--jigar khun (dysphoria) and aggression. Both factor models were supported by CFA in separate subsamples. Women had higher scores for each of the five subscales than men (p < 0.001), and larger bivariate associations with trauma (rs .24 to .29, and .10 to .19, women and men respectively) and household wealth (rs -.27 to -.39, and .05 to -.22, respectively). The three SRQ-20 subscales and the ASCL jigar khun subscale were equally associated with variance in trauma exposures. However, interactions between gender and jigar khun suggested that, relative to SRQ-20, the jigar khun subscale was more strongly associated with household wealth for women; similarly, gender interactions with aggression indicated that the aggression subscale was more strongly associated with trauma and wealth.
Two central elements of Afghan conceptualizations of mental distress--aggression and the syndrome jigar khun--were captured by the ASCL and not by the SRQ-20. The appropriateness of the culturally-grounded instrument was more salient for women, indicating that the validity of instruments may be gender-differentiated. Transcultural validation processes for tools measuring mental distress need to explicitly take gender into account. Culturally relevant measures are worth developing for long-term psychosocial programming.
在心理健康与社会心理支持的跨文化研究中,本地和国际评估工具的相对性能一直是讨论的焦点。我们检验了两种工具的结构效度和外部效度,一种是专门为阿富汗设计的,另一种是世界卫生组织为资源匮乏地区设计的。
我们使用了在阿富汗三个地点随机抽取的1003名成年阿富汗人(500名男性,503名女性)的数据。我们将22项阿富汗症状清单(ASCL),一种基于文化的社会心理健康评估工具,与普什图语和达里语版本的20项自评问卷(SRQ-20)进行了比较。我们通过探索性和验证性因素分析(EFA和CFA)得出子量表,并使用块模型回归检验总分和子量表得分在终身创伤和家庭财富方面的外部效度。
EFA表明SRQ-20具有三因素结构——躯体不适、消极情绪和情感麻木,而ASCL具有两因素结构——心痛(烦躁不安)和攻击性。两个因素模型在单独的子样本中均得到CFA的支持。女性在五个子量表中的得分均高于男性(p < 0.001),并且与创伤(女性rs为0.24至0.29,男性rs为0.10至0.19)和家庭财富(女性rs为 -0.27至 -0.39,男性rs为0.05至 -0.22)的双变量关联更大。SRQ-20的三个子量表和ASCL的心痛子量表与创伤暴露的方差同样相关。然而,性别与心痛之间的相互作用表明,相对于SRQ-20,心痛子量表与女性家庭财富的关联更强;同样,性别与攻击性的相互作用表明,攻击性子量表与创伤和财富的关联更强。
阿富汗心理困扰概念中的两个核心要素——攻击性和心痛综合征——被ASCL所捕捉,而SRQ-20未捕捉到。基于文化的工具的适用性对女性更为显著,这表明工具的效度可能存在性别差异。测量心理困扰的工具的跨文化验证过程需要明确考虑性别因素。为长期社会心理规划开发与文化相关的测量方法是值得的。