• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》对欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织核心问卷(EORTC QLQ-C30)/欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织乳腺癌模块问卷(EORTC QLQ-BR23)进行内容验证。

Content verification of the EORTC QLQ-C30/EORTC QLQ-BR23 with the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health.

作者信息

Letellier Marie-Eve, Dawes Diana, Mayo Nancy

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, 3654 Prom Sir William Osler, Montreal, QC, H3G 1Y5, Canada,

出版信息

Qual Life Res. 2015 Mar;24(3):757-68. doi: 10.1007/s11136-014-0791-8. Epub 2014 Aug 24.

DOI:10.1007/s11136-014-0791-8
PMID:25150708
Abstract

PURPOSE

The aims of this study were to estimate the extent to which the content of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-BR23 goes beyond functioning and include global feeling of well-being.

METHODS

Respectively, 21 and 13 healthcare professionals agreed to link the EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-BR23 to the ICF. Mappers were asked to independently identify appropriate codes for the corresponding items of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-BR23 following standardized linking rules and methodology. A Delphi technique was used in order to reach consensus. The threshold of agreement was 70 %. Rounds were stopped when the threshold was obtained or when it was clear that no consensus would be reached.

RESULTS

A total of 25 items out of 30 were endorsed for the EORTC QLQ-C30: 8 items were endorsed at the 4-digit level, 15 items at the 3-digit level, and 2 items reach the consensus that the items were not cover within the ICF. Only 2 items out of 23 did not reach consensus in the EORTC QLQ-BR23. Of the 21 items endorsed, 3 items were endorsed at the 5-digit level, 10 items at the 4-digit level, and 8 at the 3-digit level.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that the content of the EORTC QLQ-C30 goes beyond functioning and includes global feeling of well-being and that the content of the EORTC QLQ-BR23 is related to functioning. Furthermore, linking items to the ICF framework could be an additional method to validate the content of health-related questionnaires.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织核心问卷(EORTC QLQ-C30)和欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织乳腺癌特异性问卷(EORTC QLQ-BR23)的内容超出功能范畴并涵盖整体幸福感的程度。

方法

分别有21名和13名医疗保健专业人员同意将EORTC QLQ-C30和EORTC QLQ-BR23与国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)相联系。要求映射者按照标准化的链接规则和方法,为EORTC QLQ-C30和EORTC QLQ-BR23的相应条目独立确定合适的编码。采用德尔菲技术以达成共识。共识阈值为70%。当达到阈值或明确无法达成共识时,停止轮次。

结果

EORTC QLQ-C30的30个条目中共有25个获得认可:8个条目在4位数级别获得认可,15个条目在3位数级别获得认可,2个条目达成共识,即这些条目不在ICF范围内。EORTC QLQ-BR23的23个条目中只有2个未达成共识。在获得认可的21个条目中,3个条目在5位数级别获得认可,10个条目在4位数级别获得认可,8个条目在3位数级别获得认可。

结论

本研究表明,EORTC QLQ-C30的内容超出功能范畴并涵盖整体幸福感,且EORTC QLQ-BR23的内容与功能相关。此外,将条目与ICF框架相联系可能是验证健康相关问卷内容的一种额外方法。

相似文献

1
Content verification of the EORTC QLQ-C30/EORTC QLQ-BR23 with the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health.使用《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》对欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织核心问卷(EORTC QLQ-C30)/欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织乳腺癌模块问卷(EORTC QLQ-BR23)进行内容验证。
Qual Life Res. 2015 Mar;24(3):757-68. doi: 10.1007/s11136-014-0791-8. Epub 2014 Aug 24.
2
Validation of the Turkish versions of EORTC QLQ-C30 and BR23 modules in breast cancer patients.欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)QLQ-C30和BR23模块土耳其语版本在乳腺癌患者中的验证
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2011;12(5):1283-7.
3
Reliability and validity of Amharic version of EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BR23 modules for assessing health-related quality of life among breast cancer patients in Ethiopia.评估埃塞俄比亚乳腺癌患者健康相关生活质量的 EORTC QLQ-C30 和 QLQ-BR23 模块的阿姆哈拉语版本的可靠性和有效性。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2019 Dec 12;17(1):182. doi: 10.1186/s12955-019-1257-z.
4
Validity of the Greek EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BR23 for measuring health-related quality of life in breast cancer patients.希腊 EORTC QLQ-C30 和 QLQ-BR23 量表用于测量乳腺癌患者健康相关生活质量的有效性。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2011 May;20(3):354-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2354.2009.01170.x.
5
Reliability and Validity of the Arabic Version of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BR23 Questionnaires.欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织核心生活质量问卷(EORTC QLQ-C30)和乳腺癌特异性问卷(QLQ-BR23)阿拉伯语版本的信度和效度
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2020 Dec 11;16:3045-3052. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S263190. eCollection 2020.
6
[Validity and reliability of the quality of life questionnaire (EORTC QLQ C30) and its breast cancer module (EORTC QLQ BR23)].生活质量问卷(欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织QLQ C30)及其乳腺癌模块(欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织QLQ BR23)的效度和信度
Ginekol Pol. 2010 Apr;81(4):262-7.
7
Validation of EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BR23 questionnaires in the measurement of quality of life of breast cancer patients in Singapore.欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织核心生活质量问卷(EORTC QLQ-C30)和乳腺癌特异性问卷(QLQ-BR23)在新加坡乳腺癌患者生活质量测量中的效度验证
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2014 Apr-Jun;1(1):22-32. doi: 10.4103/2347-5625.135817.
8
An international update of the EORTC questionnaire for assessing quality of life in breast cancer patients: EORTC QLQ-BR45.欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)用于评估乳腺癌患者生活质量的问卷的国际更新版:EORTC QLQ - BR45。
Ann Oncol. 2020 Feb;31(2):283-288. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2019.10.027. Epub 2019 Dec 18.
9
The validity of EORTC QLQ-C30 fatigue scale in advanced cancer patients and cancer survivors.欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)QLQ-C30疲劳量表在晚期癌症患者和癌症幸存者中的有效性。
Palliat Med. 2003 Dec;17(8):664-72. doi: 10.1191/0269216303pm841oa.
10
Predictive factors of overall well-being using the EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL extracted from the EORTC QLQ-C30.基于 EORTC QLQ-C30 提取的 EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL 评估总体幸福感的预测因素。
J Palliat Med. 2013 Apr;16(4):402-8. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2012.0398. Epub 2013 Mar 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of Mobility Trajectories Using Wearable Inertial Sensors During Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplant.使用可穿戴惯性传感器评估自体造血细胞移植期间的移动轨迹。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2024 Jun;105(6):1106-1115. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2024.01.019. Epub 2024 Feb 12.
2
Patient-reported outcome measures in cancer care: Integration with computerized adaptive testing.癌症护理中患者报告的结局测量:与计算机自适应测试相结合。
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2023 Oct 27;10(12):100323. doi: 10.1016/j.apjon.2023.100323. eCollection 2023 Dec.
3
Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measurements in chronic and malignant diseases: ten years' experience with PRO-algorithm-based patient-clinician interaction (telePRO) in AmbuFlex.

本文引用的文献

1
Rates and predictors of consideration for adjuvant radiotherapy among high-risk breast cancer patients: a cohort study.高危乳腺癌患者接受辅助放疗的考虑因素及其预测因素:一项队列研究。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013 Jul;140(2):397-405. doi: 10.1007/s10549-013-2636-5. Epub 2013 Jul 24.
2
Persistent pain and sensory disturbances after treatment for breast cancer: six year nationwide follow-up study.乳腺癌治疗后持续性疼痛和感觉障碍:全国范围内六年随访研究。
BMJ. 2013 Apr 11;346:f1865. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f1865.
3
Prevalence of breast cancer treatment sequelae over 6 years of follow-up: the Pulling Through Study.
慢性和恶性疾病中的患者报告结局(PRO)测量:AmbuFlex 中基于 PRO 算法的医患互动(远程 PRO)的十年经验。
Qual Life Res. 2023 Apr;32(4):1053-1067. doi: 10.1007/s11136-022-03322-9. Epub 2023 Jan 13.
4
Identifying Clinically Important Functional Impairments and Rehabilitation Needs in Cancer Survivors and a Pilot Validation of the Cancer Rehabilitation Questionnaire.识别癌症幸存者的临床重要功能障碍和康复需求及癌症康复问卷的初步验证。
J Rehabil Med. 2022 Dec 16;54:jrm00354. doi: 10.2340/jrm.v54.1379.
5
Differences in functioning between young adults with cancer and older age groups: A cross-sectional study.癌症青年患者与老年群体之间功能差异的比较:一项横断面研究。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2022 Nov;31(6):e13660. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13660. Epub 2022 Jul 17.
6
Clinical Outcome Assessment in Cancer Rehabilitation and the Central Role of Patient-Reported Outcomes.癌症康复中的临床结局评估以及患者报告结局的核心作用。
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Dec 24;14(1):84. doi: 10.3390/cancers14010084.
7
Effect of different rehabilitation training timelines to prevent shoulder dysfunction among postoperative breast cancer patients: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.不同康复训练时间方案预防乳腺癌术后患者肩关节功能障碍的效果:一项随机对照试验研究方案。
Trials. 2021 Jan 6;22(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04954-3.
8
Linking the Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale (PIADS) to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health.将辅助设备的心理社会影响量表(PIADS)与国际功能、残疾和健康分类联系起来。
Qual Life Res. 2018 Dec;27(12):3217-3227. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1973-6. Epub 2018 Aug 21.
9
Using a personalized measure (Patient Generated Index (PGI)) to identify what matters to people with cancer.使用个性化测量方法(患者生成指数(PGI))来确定对癌症患者重要的事项。
Support Care Cancer. 2016 Jan;24(1):437-445. doi: 10.1007/s00520-015-2821-7. Epub 2015 Jun 23.
乳腺癌治疗后遗症的 6 年随访患病率:贯穿研究。
Cancer. 2012 Apr 15;118(8 Suppl):2217-25. doi: 10.1002/cncr.27474.
4
How to measure what matters: development and application of guiding principles to select measurement instruments in an epidemiologic study on functioning.如何衡量重要指标:在一项关于功能的流行病学研究中选择测量工具的指导原则的制定和应用。
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2011 Nov;90(11 Suppl 2):S29-38. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e318230fe41.
5
Does the Comprehensive International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) Core Set for Breast Cancer capture the problems in functioning treated by physiotherapists in women with breast cancer?《国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)》乳腺癌核心组合标准是否能捕捉到乳腺癌女性中接受物理治疗的功能障碍问题?
Physiotherapy. 2011 Mar;97(1):33-46. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2010.08.010. Epub 2010 Oct 30.
6
The extent to which common health-related quality of life indices capture constructs beyond symptoms and function.常见健康相关生活质量指标在多大程度上能够捕捉到超出症状和功能的结构。
Qual Life Res. 2011 Jun;20(5):621-7. doi: 10.1007/s11136-010-9801-7. Epub 2010 Nov 25.
7
Lymphedema beyond breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cancer-related secondary lymphedema.非乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿:癌症相关继发性淋巴水肿的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cancer. 2010 Nov 15;116(22):5138-49. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25458.
8
The risk of developing arm lymphedema among breast cancer survivors: a meta-analysis of treatment factors.乳腺癌幸存者发生上肢淋巴水肿的风险:治疗因素的荟萃分析
Ann Surg Oncol. 2009 Jul;16(7):1959-72. doi: 10.1245/s10434-009-0452-2. Epub 2009 Apr 14.
9
A framework for assessment in oncology rehabilitation.肿瘤康复评估框架。
Phys Ther. 2009 Mar;89(3):286-306. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20070309. Epub 2009 Jan 15.
10
Relationship of optimism-pessimism and health-related quality of life in breast cancer survivors.乳腺癌幸存者的乐观-悲观情绪与健康相关生活质量的关系。
J Psychosoc Oncol. 2008;26(4):15-32. doi: 10.1080/07347330802359578.