Dept. of Materials & Interfaces, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, 76305, Israel.
Adv Mater. 2014 Nov 12;26(42):7142-61. doi: 10.1002/adma.201402304. Epub 2014 Sep 25.
A central vision in molecular electronics is the creation of devices with functional molecular components that may provide unique properties. Proteins are attractive candidates for this purpose, as they have specific physical (optical, electrical) and chemical (selective binding, self-assembly) functions and offer a myriad of possibilities for (bio-)chemical modification. This Progress Report focuses on proteins as potential building components for future bioelectronic devices as they are quite efficient electronic conductors, compared with saturated organic molecules. The report addresses several questions: how general is this behavior; how does protein conduction compare with that of saturated and conjugated molecules; and what mechanisms enable efficient conduction across these large molecules? To answer these questions results of nanometer-scale and macroscopic electronic transport measurements across a range of organic molecules and proteins are compiled and analyzed, from single/few molecules to large molecular ensembles, and the influence of measurement methods on the results is considered. Generalizing, it is found that proteins conduct better than saturated molecules, and somewhat poorer than conjugated molecules. Significantly, the presence of cofactors (redox-active or conjugated) in the protein enhances their conduction, but without an obvious advantage for natural electron transfer proteins. Most likely, the conduction mechanisms are hopping (at higher temperatures) and tunneling (below ca. 150-200 K).
分子电子学的一个核心愿景是创造具有功能分子组件的设备,这些组件可能提供独特的性质。蛋白质是实现这一目标的有吸引力的候选者,因为它们具有特定的物理(光学、电学)和化学(选择性结合、自组装)功能,并为(生物)化学修饰提供了无数的可能性。本进展报告侧重于蛋白质作为未来生物电子设备的潜在构建组件,因为与饱和有机分子相比,它们是相当高效的电子导体。该报告解决了几个问题:这种行为有多普遍;蛋白质的传导与饱和和共轭分子的传导相比如何;以及什么机制使这些大分子能够有效地传导?为了回答这些问题,编译和分析了一系列有机分子和蛋白质的纳米级和宏观电子传输测量结果,从单个/少数分子到大型分子集合,并考虑了测量方法对结果的影响。总的来说,发现蛋白质的导电性优于饱和分子,而略逊于共轭分子。重要的是,蛋白质中辅助因子(氧化还原活性或共轭)的存在增强了它们的传导,但对于天然电子转移蛋白并没有明显的优势。很可能,传导机制是跳跃(在较高温度下)和隧道(在约 150-200 K 以下)。