Yamamoto K, Takei H, Koyanagi Y, Koshikawa N, Kobayashi M
Department of Pharmacology, Nihon University School of Dentistry, 1-8-13 Kanda-Surugadai, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 101-8310, Japan.
Department of Pharmacology, Nihon University School of Dentistry, 1-8-13 Kanda-Surugadai, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 101-8310, Japan; Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Nihon University School of Dentistry, 1-8-13 Kanda-Surugadai, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 101-8310, Japan.
Neuroscience. 2015 Jan 22;284:65-77. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.09.062. Epub 2014 Oct 5.
Nitric oxide (NO) is a key retrograde messenger that regulates synaptic transmission in the cerebral cortex. However, little is known about NO-induced modulatory effects and their mechanisms relative to inhibitory synaptic transmission. The present study aimed to examine the effects of NO on unitary inhibitory postsynaptic currents (uIPSCs) and to postulate the synaptic location of NO action. We performed multiple whole-cell patch-clamp recordings from rat insular cortex and divided recorded cells into three subtypes: pyramidal cells (Pyr), fast-spiking interneurons (FS), and non-FS GABAergic interneurons. In the connections from FS to Pyr (FS→Pyr), the application of S-nitroso-N-acetyl-dl-penicillamine (SNAP, 100 μM), an NO donor, suppressed uIPSC amplitudes in 31% of the connections, whereas 39% of the connections showed uIPSC facilitation. The remaining FS→Pyr connections showed little effect of SNAP on uIPSCs. An analysis of paired-pulse ratio (PPR) implied the involvement of presynaptic mechanisms in SNAP-induced effects on uIPSCs. Similar effects of SNAP were observed in FS→FS/non-FS connections; 33%, 54%, and 13% of the connections were facilitated, suppressed, and unchanged, respectively. In contrast, non-FS→Pyr or FS/non-FS showed constant uIPSC suppression by SNAP. PPR analysis supports the hypothesis that these SNAP-induced effects are mediated by presynaptic mechanisms in FS→FS/non-FS and non-FS→Pyr/FS/non-FS connections. The NO scavenger, 2-phenyl-4,4,5,5-tetramethylimidazolineoxyl-1-oxyl-3-oxide (PTIO), or the inhibitor of guanylate cyclase, 1H-[1,2,4]oxadiazolo[4,3-a]quinoxalin-1-one (ODQ), abolished the SNAP-induced uIPSC modulation. These results suggest that NO regulation of inhibitory synaptic transmission is dependent on presynaptic cell subtypes and that, at least in part, the effects are mediated by presynaptic mechanisms.
一氧化氮(NO)是一种关键的逆行信使,可调节大脑皮层中的突触传递。然而,关于NO诱导的调节作用及其与抑制性突触传递相关的机制,我们却知之甚少。本研究旨在研究NO对单突触抑制性突触后电流(uIPSCs)的影响,并推测NO作用的突触位置。我们对大鼠岛叶皮层进行了多次全细胞膜片钳记录,并将记录的细胞分为三种亚型:锥体细胞(Pyr)、快速放电中间神经元(FS)和非FS GABA能中间神经元。在从FS到Pyr(FS→Pyr)的连接中,应用NO供体S-亚硝基-N-乙酰-dl-青霉胺(SNAP,浓度为100 μM)可抑制31%连接中的uIPSC幅度,而39%的连接则显示uIPSC增强。其余的FS→Pyr连接中,SNAP对uIPSCs几乎没有影响。配对脉冲比率(PPR)分析表明,突触前机制参与了SNAP对uIPSCs的诱导作用。在FS→FS/非FS连接中也观察到了类似的SNAP效应;分别有33%、54%和13%的连接增强、抑制和无变化。相比之下,非FS→Pyr或FS/非FS连接中,SNAP持续抑制uIPSC。PPR分析支持这样的假设,即这些SNAP诱导的效应是由FS→FS/非FS和非FS→Pyr/FS/非FS连接中的突触前机制介导的。NO清除剂2-苯基-4,4,5,5-四甲基咪唑啉氧基-1-氧基-3-氧化物(PTIO)或鸟苷酸环化酶抑制剂1H-[1,2,4]恶二唑并[4,3-a]喹喔啉-1-酮(ODQ)消除了SNAP诱导的uIPSC调制。这些结果表明,NO对抑制性突触传递的调节取决于突触前细胞亚型,并且至少部分效应是由突触前机制介导的。