Richards Kathy C, Bost James E, Rogers Valerie E, Hutchison Lisa C, Beck Cornelia K, Bliwise Donald L, Kovach Christine R, Cuellar Norma, Allen Richard P
George Mason University, Fairfax, VA.
Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA.
Sleep. 2015 Mar 1;38(3):371-80. doi: 10.5665/sleep.4492.
Lack of a valid diagnostic measure of restless legs syndrome (RLS) for persons with dementia, who do not have the cognitive ability to report complex symptoms, impedes RLS treatment and research in this population. The aim of this study was to determine the sensitivity and specificity of a combination of indicators for identifying RLS that could eventually be used to diagnose RLS in persons with dementia.
3-day, prospective instrument validation.
Sleep laboratory.
Cognitively intact, 107 with RLS, 105 without RLS.
N/A.
Serial 20-min observations with a new measure, the Behavioral Indicators Test-Restless Legs (BIT-RL); leg movements with 3 nights of the Periodic Activity Monitor-Restless Legs (PAM-RL); ferritin; sleep history; clinical data; polysomnography; Hopkins Telephone Diagnostic Interview of RLS Symptoms.
The best-fitting diagnostic model for identifying RLS included previous history of iron deficiency (odds ratio [OR] 7.30), leg discomfort (OR 6.47), daytime fatigue (OR 6.15), difficulty falling asleep (OR 3.25), RLS family history (OR 2.60), BIT-RL (OR 1.49), and absence of diabetes (OR 0.27), with sensitivity 78%, specificity 79%, and 77% correctly classified. This model retained its predictive accuracy even with co-morbid sleep apnea.
When compared to those without RLS, persons with RLS have observable behaviors, such as rubbing the legs, that differentiate them, but the behaviors have no circadian and activity-related variability. The final model of clinical and sleep historical data and observation for RLS behaviors using the BIT-RL had good diagnostic accuracy.
对于患有痴呆症且缺乏报告复杂症状认知能力的患者,缺乏有效的不安腿综合征(RLS)诊断方法阻碍了该人群的RLS治疗与研究。本研究的目的是确定一组指标组合用于识别RLS的敏感性和特异性,最终可用于诊断痴呆症患者的RLS。
为期3天的前瞻性仪器验证。
睡眠实验室。
认知功能正常者,107例有RLS,105例无RLS。
无。
使用新的行为指标测试-不安腿(BIT-RL)进行连续20分钟观察;使用周期性活动监测仪-不安腿(PAM-RL)记录3晚的腿部运动;检测铁蛋白;睡眠史;临床数据;多导睡眠图;霍普金斯不安腿综合征症状电话诊断访谈。
识别RLS的最佳诊断模型包括缺铁既往史(优势比[OR]7.30)、腿部不适(OR 6.47)、白天疲劳(OR 6.15)、入睡困难(OR 3.25)、RLS家族史(OR 2.60)、BIT-RL(OR 1.49)以及无糖尿病(OR 0.27),敏感性为78%,特异性为79%,正确分类率为77%。即使存在合并症睡眠呼吸暂停,该模型仍保持其预测准确性。
与无RLS者相比,有RLS者存在可观察到的行为,如揉搓腿部,这些行为可将他们区分开来,但这些行为没有昼夜节律和与活动相关的变异性。使用BIT-RL的RLS行为临床和睡眠历史数据及观察的最终模型具有良好的诊断准确性。