Sheehan Rory, Sinai Amanda, Bass Nick, Blatchford Pippa, Bohnen Ingrid, Bonell Simon, Courtenay Ken, Hassiotis Angela, Markar Therese, McCarthy Jane, Mukherji Kamalika, Naeem Asim, Paschos Dimitrios, Perez-Achiaga Natalia, Sharma Vijaya, Thomas David, Walker Zuzana, Strydom Andre
Mental Health Sciences Unit, University College London, London, UK.
Camden Learning Disabilities Service, London, UK.
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2015 Aug;30(8):857-63. doi: 10.1002/gps.4228. Epub 2014 Nov 3.
Dementia is a common clinical presentation among older adults with Down syndrome. The presentation of dementia in Down syndrome differs compared with typical Alzheimer's disease. The performance of manualised dementia criteria in the International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10 and Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-IV-Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) is uncertain in this population.We aimed to determine the concurrent validity and reliability of clinicians' diagnoses of dementia against ICD-10 and DSM-IV-TR diagnoses. Validity of clinical diagnoses were also explored by establishing the stability of diagnoses over time.
We used clinical data from memory assessments of 85 people with Down syndrome, of whom 64 (75.3%) had a diagnosis of dementia. The cases of dementia were presented to expert raters who rated the case as dementia or no dementia using ICD-10 and DSM-IV-TR criteria and their own clinical judgement.
We found that clinician's judgement corresponded best with clinically diagnosed cases of dementia, identifying 84.4% cases of clinically diagnosed dementia at the time of diagnosis. ICD-10 criteria identified 70.3% cases, and DSM-IV-TR criteria identified 56.3% cases at the time of clinically diagnosed dementia. Over time, the proportion of cases meeting ICD-10 or DSM-IV-TR diagnoses increased, suggesting that experienced clinicians used their clinical knowledge of dementia presentation in Down syndrome to diagnose the disorder at an earlier stage than would have been possible had they relied on the classic description contained in the diagnostic systems.
Clinical diagnosis of dementia in Down syndrome is valid and reliable and can be used as the standard against which new criteria such as the DSM-5 are measured.
痴呆是唐氏综合征老年患者常见的临床表现。唐氏综合征患者痴呆的表现与典型的阿尔茨海默病有所不同。国际疾病分类(ICD)-10和《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第四版文本修订版(DSM-IV-TR)中痴呆标准手册在该人群中的表现尚不确定。我们旨在确定临床医生对痴呆的诊断与ICD-10和DSM-IV-TR诊断的同时效度和信度。还通过确定诊断随时间的稳定性来探讨临床诊断的效度。
我们使用了85例唐氏综合征患者记忆评估的临床数据,其中64例(75.3%)被诊断为痴呆。将痴呆病例提交给专家评估人员,他们根据ICD-10和DSM-IV-TR标准以及自己的临床判断将病例评定为痴呆或非痴呆。
我们发现临床医生的判断与临床诊断的痴呆病例最为相符,在诊断时识别出84.4%的临床诊断痴呆病例。在临床诊断痴呆时,ICD-10标准识别出70.3%的病例,DSM-IV-TR标准识别出56.3%的病例。随着时间的推移,符合ICD-10或DSM-IV-TR诊断的病例比例增加,这表明经验丰富的临床医生利用他们对唐氏综合征痴呆表现的临床知识,比仅依靠诊断系统中的经典描述更早地诊断出该疾病。
唐氏综合征患者痴呆的临床诊断是有效且可靠的,可作为衡量DSM-5等新标准的标准。