Vossen Tessa, Towns Alexandra, Ruysschaert Sofie, Quiroz Diana, van Andel Tinde
Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
PLoS One. 2014 Nov 5;9(11):e112345. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112345. eCollection 2014.
Folk perceptions of health and illness include cultural bound syndromes (CBS), ailments generally confined to certain cultural groups or geographic regions and often treated with medicinal plants. Our aim was to compare definitions and plant use for CBS regarding child health in the context of the largest migration in recent human history: the trans-Atlantic slave trade. We compared definitions of four CBS (walk early, evil eye, atita and fontanels) and associated plant use among three Afro-Surinamese populations and their African ancestor groups in Ghana, Bénin and Gabon. We expected plant use to be similar on species level, and assumed the majority to be weedy or domesticated species, as these occur on both continents and were probably recognized by enslaved Africans. Data were obtained by identifying plants mentioned during interviews with local women from the six different populations. To analyse differences and similarities in plant use we used Detrended Component Analysis (DCA) and a Wald Chi-square test. Definitions of the four cultural bound syndromes were roughly the same on both continents. In total, 324 plant species were used. There was little overlap between Suriname and Africa: 15 species were used on two continents, of which seven species were used for the same CBS. Correspondence on family level was much higher. Surinamese populations used significantly more weedy species than Africans, but equal percentages of domesticated plants. Our data indicate that Afro-Surinamers have searched for similar plants to treat their CBS as they remembered from Africa. In some cases, they have found the same species, but they had to reinvent the largest part of their herbal pharmacopeia to treat their CBS using known plant families or trying out new species. Ideas on health and illness appear to be more resilient than the use of plants to treat them.
民间对健康和疾病的认知包括文化束缚综合征(CBS),这类疾病通常局限于某些文化群体或地理区域,并且常使用药用植物进行治疗。我们的目标是在近代人类历史上最大规模的移民活动——跨大西洋奴隶贸易的背景下,比较关于儿童健康的文化束缚综合征的定义及植物用途。我们比较了三种非洲裔苏里南人群体及其在加纳、贝宁和加蓬的非洲祖先群体对四种文化束缚综合征(走路早、邪眼、阿蒂塔和囟门)的定义以及相关植物的用途。我们预计在物种层面上植物的用途会相似,并假定大多数是杂草类或驯化物种,因为这些物种在两大洲都有出现,而且可能被被奴役的非洲人所认识。数据是通过识别在对来自六个不同群体的当地女性进行访谈时提到的植物而获得的。为了分析植物用途的差异和相似性,我们使用了去趋势成分分析(DCA)和Wald卡方检验。这四种文化束缚综合征在两大洲的定义大致相同。总共使用了324种植物物种。苏里南和非洲之间几乎没有重叠:15种植物在两大洲都被使用,其中7种用于相同的文化束缚综合征。在科的层面上的对应性要高得多。苏里南人群体使用的杂草类物种明显多于非洲人,但驯化植物的比例相同。我们的数据表明,非洲裔苏里南人一直在寻找与他们从非洲记忆中相似的植物来治疗他们的文化束缚综合征。在某些情况下,他们找到了相同的物种,但他们不得不重新创造其草药药典的大部分内容,以便使用已知的植物科或尝试新的物种来治疗他们的文化束缚综合征。关于健康和疾病的观念似乎比用于治疗它们的植物的使用更具韧性。