Center for Population Health and Aging, Duke University , Durham, NC , USA.
Front Public Health. 2014 Nov 6;2:228. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2014.00228. eCollection 2014.
Longitudinal data on aging, health, and longevity provide a wealth of information to investigate different aspects of the processes of aging and development of diseases leading to death. Statistical methods aimed at analyses of time-to-event data jointly with longitudinal measurements became known as the "joint models" (JM). An important point to consider in analyses of such data in the context of studies on aging, health, and longevity is how to incorporate knowledge and theories about mechanisms and regularities of aging-related changes that accumulate in the research field into respective analytic approaches. In the absence of specific observations of longitudinal dynamics of relevant biomarkers manifesting such mechanisms and regularities, traditional approaches have a rather limited utility to estimate respective parameters that can be meaningfully interpreted from the biological point of view. A conceptual analytic framework for these purposes, the stochastic process model of aging (SPM), has been recently developed in the biodemographic literature. It incorporates available knowledge about mechanisms of aging-related changes, which may be hidden in the individual longitudinal trajectories of physiological variables and this allows for analyzing their indirect impact on risks of diseases and death. Despite, essentially, serving similar purposes, JM and SPM developed in parallel in different disciplines with very limited cross-referencing. Although there were several publications separately reviewing these two approaches, there were no publications presenting both these approaches in some detail. Here, we overview both approaches jointly and provide some new modifications of SPM. We discuss the use of stochastic processes to capture biological variation and heterogeneity in longitudinal patterns and important and promising (but still largely underused) applications of JM and SPM to predictions of individual and population mortality and health-related outcomes.
纵向数据在衰老、健康和长寿方面提供了丰富的信息,可以用于研究衰老和疾病发展过程的不同方面,导致死亡。旨在联合分析时变数据和纵向测量的统计方法被称为“联合模型”(JM)。在衰老、健康和长寿研究背景下分析此类数据时,需要考虑的一个重要问题是如何将关于衰老相关变化机制和规律的知识和理论纳入到各自的分析方法中。在缺乏表现这些机制和规律的相关生物标志物纵向动态的具体观察的情况下,传统方法在从生物学角度解释各自的参数方面的实用性相当有限。为了实现这一目的,生物统计学文献中最近提出了一个概念性分析框架,即衰老的随机过程模型(SPM)。它整合了关于衰老相关变化机制的可用知识,这些知识可能隐藏在生理变量的个体纵向轨迹中,这使得可以分析它们对疾病和死亡风险的间接影响。尽管 JM 和 SPM 的目的基本相同,但它们是在不同学科中平行发展的,相互参考非常有限。尽管有几篇文献分别对这两种方法进行了综述,但没有一篇文献详细介绍这两种方法。在这里,我们联合综述了这两种方法,并对 SPM 进行了一些新的改进。我们讨论了使用随机过程来捕捉纵向模式中的生物变异性和异质性,以及 JM 和 SPM 在个体和人群死亡率和健康相关结果预测方面的重要和有前途(但仍未得到充分利用)的应用。