Rosenblatt Eduardo
Applied Radiation Biology and Radiotherapy Section, Division of Human Health, International Atomic Energy Agency , Vienna , Austria.
Front Oncol. 2014 Nov 25;4:315. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2014.00315. eCollection 2014.
Countries, states, and island nations often need forward planning of their radiotherapy services driven by different motives. Countries without radiotherapy services sponsor patients to receive radiotherapy abroad. They often engage professionals for a feasibility study in order to establish whether it would be more cost-beneficial to establish a radiotherapy facility. Countries where radiotherapy services have developed without any central planning, find themselves in situations where many of the available centers are private and thus inaccessible for a majority of patients with limited resources. Government may decide to plan ahead when a significant exodus of cancer patients travel to another country for treatment, thus exposing the failure of the country to provide this medical service for its citizens. In developed countries, the trigger has been the existence of highly visible waiting lists for radiotherapy revealing a shortage of radiotherapy equipment. This paper suggests that there should be a systematic and comprehensive process of long-term planning of radiotherapy services at the national level, taking into account the regulatory infrastructure for radiation protection, planning of centers, equipment, staff, education programs, quality assurance, and sustainability aspects. Realistic budgetary and cost considerations must also be part of the project proposal or business plan.
国家、州和岛国常常出于不同动机,需要对其放射治疗服务进行前瞻性规划。没有放射治疗服务的国家会资助患者到国外接受放射治疗。它们通常会聘请专业人员进行可行性研究,以确定建立放射治疗设施是否更具成本效益。那些在没有任何中央规划的情况下发展起来放射治疗服务的国家,发现自己面临这样的情况:许多现有的中心是私立的,因此大多数资源有限的患者无法使用。当大量癌症患者前往另一个国家接受治疗,从而暴露出该国未能为其公民提供这项医疗服务时,政府可能会决定提前规划。在发达国家,促使进行规划的原因是存在明显的放射治疗等候名单,这表明放射治疗设备短缺。本文建议,在国家层面应有一个系统、全面的放射治疗服务长期规划过程,要考虑到辐射防护的监管基础设施、中心规划、设备、人员、教育项目、质量保证和可持续性等方面。现实的预算和成本考量也必须成为项目提案或商业计划的一部分。