• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

先阅读还是先闻?呈现顺序对气味识别的影响。

Reading first or smelling first? Effects of presentation order on odor identification.

作者信息

Sorokowska A, Albrecht E, Hummel T

机构信息

Smell & Taste Clinic, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstrasse 74, Dresden, 01307, Germany,

出版信息

Atten Percept Psychophys. 2015 Apr;77(3):731-6. doi: 10.3758/s13414-014-0811-3.

DOI:10.3758/s13414-014-0811-3
PMID:25520045
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4381111/
Abstract

Verbal labels are potent manipulators for olfactory perception, and verbal descriptors used in a cued olfactory identification test will influence the testing results. The main aim of the present study was to test whether the order of presentation of the odorants and the corresponding set of labels (verbal descriptors with or without pictures) would influence the results of a psychophysical odor identification test in 100 normosmic subjects (49 women and 51 men) and 100 patients with olfactory dysfunction (61 women and 39 men). Additionally, we investigated whether the scores would be different between subjects identifying odors from a list of verbal descriptors and subjects using both pictures and verbal descriptors. The subjects were examined with the extended, 32-item "Sniffin' Sticks" identification test. We found that the scores of normosmic subjects were significantly higher when the subjects were presented with label options prior to smelling, whereas for patients the scores in the two conditions did not differ. Moreover, in both groups the scores were not significantly different when the subjects were presented either with verbal descriptors only or with verbal descriptors and pictures. Our findings seem to be of importance not only to research involving psychophysical olfactory identification tests or in a clinical context, but also to further experiments investigating human olfaction and cognition.

摘要

语言标签是嗅觉感知的有力操控因素,在嗅觉线索识别测试中使用的语言描述会影响测试结果。本研究的主要目的是测试气味剂和相应标签集(有或没有图片的语言描述)的呈现顺序是否会影响100名嗅觉正常受试者(49名女性和51名男性)和100名嗅觉功能障碍患者(61名女性和39名男性)的心理物理学气味识别测试结果。此外,我们还研究了从语言描述列表中识别气味的受试者和同时使用图片和语言描述的受试者的得分是否会有所不同。受试者接受了扩展的、包含32个条目的“嗅觉棒”识别测试。我们发现,对于嗅觉正常的受试者,在闻气味之前先呈现标签选项时得分显著更高,而对于患者,两种情况下的得分没有差异。此外,在两组中,仅呈现语言描述或同时呈现语言描述和图片时,受试者的得分没有显著差异。我们的研究结果似乎不仅对涉及心理物理学嗅觉识别测试的研究或临床环境很重要,而且对进一步研究人类嗅觉和认知的实验也很重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57fd/4381111/05dacf3e806d/13414_2014_811_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57fd/4381111/05dacf3e806d/13414_2014_811_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57fd/4381111/05dacf3e806d/13414_2014_811_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Reading first or smelling first? Effects of presentation order on odor identification.先阅读还是先闻?呈现顺序对气味识别的影响。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2015 Apr;77(3):731-6. doi: 10.3758/s13414-014-0811-3.
2
Cross-cultural application of the "Sniffin' Sticks" odor identification test.“嗅觉棒”嗅觉识别测试的跨文化应用
Am J Rhinol. 2007 Sep-Oct;21(5):570-3. doi: 10.2500/ajr.2007.21.3075.
3
Danish validation of sniffin' sticks olfactory test for threshold, discrimination, and identification.丹麦对嗅觉棒嗅觉测试在阈值、辨别力和识别方面的验证。
Laryngoscope. 2018 Aug;128(8):1759-1766. doi: 10.1002/lary.27052. Epub 2017 Dec 20.
4
Determination of Retronasal Olfactory Threshold Values.测定反鼻音嗅觉阈值。
Laryngoscope. 2021 Jul;131(7):1608-1614. doi: 10.1002/lary.29395. Epub 2021 Feb 3.
5
Extended version of the "Sniffin' Sticks" identification test: test-retest reliability and validity.“嗅觉棒”识别测试扩展版:重测信度与效度
J Neurosci Methods. 2015 Mar 30;243:111-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2015.01.034. Epub 2015 Feb 10.
6
The candy smell test: a new test for retronasal olfactory performance.糖果气味测试:一种用于鼻后嗅觉功能的新测试。
Laryngoscope. 2009 Mar;119(3):487-95. doi: 10.1002/lary.20123.
7
Effectiveness of olfactory training on different severities of posttraumatic loss of smell.嗅觉训练对不同严重程度创伤后嗅觉丧失的有效性。
Laryngoscope. 2019 Aug;129(8):1737-1743. doi: 10.1002/lary.27832. Epub 2019 Mar 8.
8
Clinical significance of results from olfactory testing.嗅觉测试结果的临床意义。
Laryngoscope. 2006 Oct;116(10):1858-63. doi: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000234915.51189.cb.
9
Validation study of the "Sniffin' Sticks" olfactory test in a British population: a preliminary communication.“嗅探棒”嗅觉测试在英国人群中的验证研究:初步交流。
Clin Otolaryngol. 2012 Feb;37(1):23-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2012.02431.x.
10
Comparison of clinical tests of olfactory function.嗅觉功能临床测试的比较
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Apr;273(4):927-31. doi: 10.1007/s00405-015-3682-x. Epub 2015 Jun 7.

引用本文的文献

1
The olfactory test established by Henkin: is it reliable and does it correlate to established psychophysical tests?亨金嗅觉测试:它是否可靠,与已建立的心理物理测试相关吗?
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Oct;281(10):5541-5547. doi: 10.1007/s00405-024-08900-w. Epub 2024 Aug 23.
2
Olfactory Function and Olfactory Disorders.嗅觉功能与嗅觉障碍。
Laryngorhinootologie. 2023 May;102(S 01):S67-S92. doi: 10.1055/a-1957-3267. Epub 2023 May 2.
3
Odor perception of aromatherapy essential oils with different chemical types: Influence of gender and two cultural characteristics.

本文引用的文献

1
Changes of olfactory abilities in relation to age: odor identification in more than 1400 people aged 4 to 80 years.嗅觉能力随年龄的变化:1400多名4至80岁人群的气味识别情况
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2015 Aug;272(8):1937-44. doi: 10.1007/s00405-014-3263-4. Epub 2014 Sep 20.
2
Cross-modal integration between odors and abstract symbols.气味和抽象符号之间的跨模态整合。
Neurosci Lett. 2010 Jul 12;478(3):175-8. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2010.05.011. Epub 2010 May 12.
3
Cognitive factors in odor detection, odor discrimination, and odor identification tasks.
不同化学类型的芳香疗法精油的气味感知:性别和两种文化特征的影响
Front Psychol. 2022 Nov 10;13:998612. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.998612. eCollection 2022.
4
Olfactory and Gustatory Outcomes Including Health-Related Quality of Life 3-6 and 12 Months after Severe-to-Critical COVID-19: A SECURe Prospective Cohort Study.重症至危重症新冠病毒病感染3至6个月及12个月后的嗅觉和味觉结果,包括与健康相关的生活质量:一项SECURe前瞻性队列研究
J Clin Med. 2022 Oct 12;11(20):6025. doi: 10.3390/jcm11206025.
5
q-Powders: a quick test for screening retronasal olfactory disorders with tasteless powders.q-粉:一种快速测试无味粉末后鼻嗅觉障碍的方法。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 Feb;279(2):779-784. doi: 10.1007/s00405-021-06849-8. Epub 2021 May 4.
6
Development of the Spanish Version of Sniffin's Sticks Olfactory Identification Test: Normative Data and Validity of Parallel Measures.Sniffin's Sticks嗅觉识别测试西班牙语版本的开发:常模数据与平行测量的有效性
Brain Sci. 2021 Feb 10;11(2):216. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11020216.
7
Sex Differences in Human Olfaction: A Meta-Analysis.人类嗅觉中的性别差异:一项荟萃分析。
Front Psychol. 2019 Feb 13;10:242. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00242. eCollection 2019.
8
Olfactory perception and blindness: a systematic review and meta-analysis.嗅觉感知与失明:系统综述和荟萃分析。
Psychol Res. 2019 Nov;83(8):1595-1611. doi: 10.1007/s00426-018-1035-2. Epub 2018 Jun 12.
9
Cultural Adaptation of the Portuguese Version of the "Sniffin' Sticks" Smell Test: Reliability, Validity, and Normative Data.《“嗅觉棒”嗅觉测试葡萄牙语版本的文化适应性:信度、效度及常模数据》
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 10;11(2):e0148937. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148937. eCollection 2016.
10
Olfaction in People with Down Syndrome: A Comprehensive Assessment across Four Decades of Age.唐氏综合征患者的嗅觉:跨越四个年龄段的综合评估
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 5;11(1):e0146486. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146486. eCollection 2016.
气味检测、气味辨别和气味识别任务中的认知因素。
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2010 Dec;32(10):1062-7. doi: 10.1080/13803391003683070. Epub 2010 Apr 30.
4
Number of descriptors in cued odor identification tests.线索气味识别测试中的描述词数量。
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010 Mar;136(3):296-300. doi: 10.1001/archoto.2009.231.
5
High test-retest reliability of the extended version of the "Sniffin' Sticks" test.“嗅觉棒”测试扩展版具有较高的重测信度。
Chem Senses. 2009 Oct;34(8):705-11. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjp057.
6
The influence of distractors on odor identification.干扰因素对气味识别的影响。
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009 Feb;135(2):143-5. doi: 10.1001/archotol.135.2.143.
7
Odor identification in mild cognitive impairment subtypes.轻度认知障碍亚型中的气味识别
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2008 Feb;30(2):151-6. doi: 10.1080/13803390701287408.
8
Normative data for the "Sniffin' Sticks" including tests of odor identification, odor discrimination, and olfactory thresholds: an upgrade based on a group of more than 3,000 subjects.“嗅觉棒”的标准化数据,包括气味识别、气味辨别和嗅觉阈值测试:基于3000多名受试者的更新。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2007 Mar;264(3):237-43. doi: 10.1007/s00405-006-0173-0. Epub 2006 Sep 23.
9
Assessing olfaction in the neuropsychological exam: the relationship between odor identification and cognition in older adults.在神经心理学检查中评估嗅觉:老年人嗅觉识别与认知之间的关系。
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2005 Aug;20(6):761-9. doi: 10.1016/j.acn.2005.04.010.
10
Cognitive modulation of olfactory processing.嗅觉处理的认知调节。
Neuron. 2005 May 19;46(4):671-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.04.021.