• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

亨金嗅觉测试:它是否可靠,与已建立的心理物理测试相关吗?

The olfactory test established by Henkin: is it reliable and does it correlate to established psychophysical tests?

机构信息

Smell and Taste Clinic, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.

Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Asian Hospital and Medical Center, Muntinlupa, Philippines.

出版信息

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Oct;281(10):5541-5547. doi: 10.1007/s00405-024-08900-w. Epub 2024 Aug 23.

DOI:10.1007/s00405-024-08900-w
PMID:39179916
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11416371/
Abstract

PURPOSE

This pilot study aimed to determine whether the Henkin olfactory test discriminates between the olfactory function of patients with olfactory loss and healthy individuals, and whether the Henkin test is correlated with a validated psychophysical olfactory test.

METHODS

Participants underwent olfactory testing using the modified Henkin test (including detection [DT] and recognition [RT] thresholds, magnitude estimation [ME], and hedonic ratings [H], for four different odors) and the extended "Sniffin' Sticks" test battery (odor detection, discrimination, identification).

RESULTS

Forty-four individuals (28 women, aged 19-81 years, mean: 39 years) were included. Twenty-three were healthy (mean age: 38 years) and 21 had olfactory dysfunction (OD) (mean age: 40 years). OD patients had worse mean DT, lower composite RT, and lower ME ratings. Mean and individual odor H ratings were not significantly different between the groups. Most individuals were classified as hyposmic when using the prescribed classification by Henkin, with only very few satisfying the stringent criteria of anosmia and normosmia. Modified Henkin subtests were all positively correlated with each other and with the "Sniffin' Sticks", except for Unpleasant Mean H which was only correlated with Pleasant Mean H; and Pleasant mean H which was not correlated with mean DT scores.

CONCLUSION

The Henkin test is able to separate between OD patients and controls. However, modifications to the conduct of this test may be required. Studies that used this test should be carefully interpreted.

摘要

目的

本初步研究旨在确定 Henkin 嗅觉测试是否能区分嗅觉丧失患者和健康个体的嗅觉功能,以及 Henkin 测试是否与经过验证的心理物理学嗅觉测试相关。

方法

参与者接受了改良 Henkin 测试(包括检测 [DT] 和识别 [RT] 阈值、主观评分 [ME] 和愉悦评分 [H],用于四种不同气味)和扩展的“Sniffin' Sticks”测试套件(嗅觉检测、辨别、识别)的嗅觉测试。

结果

共有 44 人(28 名女性,年龄 19-81 岁,平均年龄:39 岁)参与了研究。其中 23 人健康(平均年龄:38 岁),21 人嗅觉功能障碍(OD)(平均年龄:40 岁)。OD 患者的平均 DT 更差,综合 RT 更低,ME 评分更低。两组的平均和个体气味 H 评分无显著差异。大多数个体根据 Henkin 规定的分类被归类为嗅觉减退,只有极少数符合嗅觉丧失和嗅觉正常的严格标准。改良 Henkin 子测试彼此之间以及与“Sniffin' Sticks”均呈正相关,除了不愉快平均 H 仅与愉快平均 H 相关,以及愉快平均 H 与平均 DT 评分不相关。

结论

Henkin 测试能够区分 OD 患者和对照组。然而,可能需要对该测试的进行方式进行修改。使用该测试的研究应谨慎解释。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0045/11416371/81a5d2a03722/405_2024_8900_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0045/11416371/81a5d2a03722/405_2024_8900_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0045/11416371/81a5d2a03722/405_2024_8900_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The olfactory test established by Henkin: is it reliable and does it correlate to established psychophysical tests?亨金嗅觉测试:它是否可靠,与已建立的心理物理测试相关吗?
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Oct;281(10):5541-5547. doi: 10.1007/s00405-024-08900-w. Epub 2024 Aug 23.
2
Impact of Hedonics and Magnitude Upon Validated Psychophysical Olfactory Tests and Olfactory-Specific Quality of Life.享乐主义和强度对经过验证的心理物理学嗅觉测试及嗅觉特异性生活质量的影响。
Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2023 May;37(3):253-263. doi: 10.1177/19458924221136649. Epub 2022 Nov 6.
3
Determination of Retronasal Olfactory Threshold Values.测定反鼻音嗅觉阈值。
Laryngoscope. 2021 Jul;131(7):1608-1614. doi: 10.1002/lary.29395. Epub 2021 Feb 3.
4
Clinical significance of results from olfactory testing.嗅觉测试结果的临床意义。
Laryngoscope. 2006 Oct;116(10):1858-63. doi: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000234915.51189.cb.
5
[Clinical application of Sniffin' Sticks olfactory psychophysical measurements].[嗅觉棒嗅觉心理物理学测量的临床应用]
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Sep;48(9):741-5.
6
Danish validation of sniffin' sticks olfactory test for threshold, discrimination, and identification.丹麦对嗅觉棒嗅觉测试在阈值、辨别力和识别方面的验证。
Laryngoscope. 2018 Aug;128(8):1759-1766. doi: 10.1002/lary.27052. Epub 2017 Dec 20.
7
Validation study of the "Sniffin' Sticks" olfactory test in a British population: a preliminary communication.“嗅探棒”嗅觉测试在英国人群中的验证研究:初步交流。
Clin Otolaryngol. 2012 Feb;37(1):23-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2012.02431.x.
8
Investigation of the Sniffin' Sticks olfactory test in Taiwan and comparison with different continents.探讨 Sniffin' Sticks 嗅觉测试在台湾地区的应用,并与其他不同大陆地区进行比较。
J Chin Med Assoc. 2010 Sep;73(9):483-6. doi: 10.1016/S1726-4901(10)70103-9.
9
The applicability of the "Sniffin' Sticks" olfactory test in a Turkish population.“嗅探棒”嗅觉测试在土耳其人群中的适用性。
Med Sci Monit. 2013 Dec 30;19:1221-6. doi: 10.12659/MSM.889838.
10
The "Sniffin' Kids-PT" test: A smell test variant for Portuguese children.“嗅闻儿童-PT”测试:葡萄牙儿童的嗅觉测试变体。
Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis. 2024 Mar;141(2):69-75. doi: 10.1016/j.anorl.2023.12.003. Epub 2024 Jan 17.

引用本文的文献

1
The mysterious sense of smell: evolution, historical perspectives, and neurological disorders.神秘的嗅觉:进化、历史视角及神经障碍
Front Hum Neurosci. 2025 Jun 13;19:1588935. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2025.1588935. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Variations of olfactory function with circadian timing and chronotype.嗅觉功能随昼夜节律和时型的变化。
Rhinology. 2023 Oct 1;61(5):456-469. doi: 10.4193/Rhin23.150.
2
Olfactory Nomenclature: An Orchestrated Effort to Clarify Terms and Definitions of Dysosmia, Anosmia, Hyposmia, Normosmia, Hyperosmia, Olfactory Intolerance, Parosmia, and Phantosmia/Olfactory Hallucination.嗅觉命名法:澄清嗅觉障碍(包括嗅觉减退、嗅觉丧失、嗅觉减退、嗅觉正常、嗅觉过度、嗅觉过敏、幻嗅和嗅觉幻觉)相关术语和定义的协调努力。
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2023;85(6):312-320. doi: 10.1159/000530211. Epub 2023 Apr 14.
3
Assessment of postviral qualitative olfactory dysfunction using the short SSParoT in patients with and without parosmia.
采用短版 SSParoT 评估病毒后嗅觉功能障碍的定性分析:伴有及不伴有幻嗅患者的研究。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023 Jan;280(1):469-472. doi: 10.1007/s00405-022-07574-6. Epub 2022 Aug 25.
4
Updated Sniffin' Sticks normative data based on an extended sample of 9139 subjects.基于9139名受试者的扩展样本更新的嗅觉棒常模数据。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Mar;276(3):719-728. doi: 10.1007/s00405-018-5248-1. Epub 2018 Dec 15.
5
The Influence of Circadian Timing on Olfactory Sensitivity.昼夜节律对嗅觉敏感性的影响。
Chem Senses. 2017 Dec 25;43(1):45-51. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjx067.
6
Improved smell function with increased nasal mucus sonic hedgehog in hyposmic patients after treatment with oral theophylline.口服茶碱治疗后,嗅觉减退患者的鼻腔黏液中声波刺猬蛋白增加,嗅觉功能得到改善。
Am J Otolaryngol. 2017 Mar-Apr;38(2):143-147. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2016.11.010. Epub 2016 Nov 23.
7
Initiation of smell function in patients with congenital hyposmia.先天性嗅觉减退患者嗅觉功能的启动
Am J Otolaryngol. 2016 May-Jun;37(3):175-81. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2016.01.001. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
8
Reading first or smelling first? Effects of presentation order on odor identification.先阅读还是先闻?呈现顺序对气味识别的影响。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2015 Apr;77(3):731-6. doi: 10.3758/s13414-014-0811-3.
9
Taste and smell function in chronic disease: a review of clinical and biochemical evaluations of taste and smell dysfunction in over 5000 patients at The Taste and Smell Clinic in Washington, DC.味觉和嗅觉在慢性病中的作用:对华盛顿特区味觉和嗅觉诊所 5000 多名患者的味觉和嗅觉功能障碍的临床和生化评估综述。
Am J Otolaryngol. 2013 Sep-Oct;34(5):477-89. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2013.04.006. Epub 2013 Jun 2.
10
Intranasal theophylline treatment of hyposmia and hypogeusia: a pilot study.鼻内使用茶碱治疗嗅觉减退和味觉减退:一项初步研究。
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012 Nov;138(11):1064-70. doi: 10.1001/2013.jamaoto.342.