• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

口服与颊部应用咪达唑仑用于儿科牙科镇静的比较:一项关于疗效、接受度和安全性的随机交叉临床试验。

Comparison of oral and buccal midazolam for pediatric dental sedation: a randomized, cross-over, clinical trial for efficacy, acceptance and safety.

作者信息

Tavassoli-Hojjati Sara, Mehran Majid, Haghgoo Roza, Tohid-Rahbari Monireh, Ahmadi Rahil

机构信息

Pediatric Dentistry Department, Dental School, Shahed University , Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Iran J Pediatr. 2014 Apr;24(2):198-206.

PMID:25535540
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4268841/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Providing a safe and efficient dental treatment for a young patient is a challenge for the dentist and the child. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness, safety and acceptability of buccal midazolam in dental pediatric patients and to compare it with oral Midazolam.

METHODS

Eighteen uncooperative healthy children aged 2.5-6 years were randomized to each of buccal midazolam (0.3mg/kg) or oral midazolam (0.5mg/kg) at the first visit, the alternative has been used at the second visit in a cross-over manner. The study took place at pediatric dentistry clinic of Shahed University, Tehran, from November 2011 to June 2012. The patients' vital signs and behavioral scores were recorded. The patient, the operator and the observer were blinded to the applied medication. Post operatively, patients' and parents' satisfaction were assessed by Visual Analogue Score and a questionnaire respectively. The P-value was set at 0.05 for significance level.

FINDINGS

There were no significant differences in physiologic factors in the medication groups at time 0, 10, 20, 30 minutes and discharge. There was also no significant difference between the two groups in behavioral parameters. The majority of parents rated both sedative agents as "effective" or "very effective" and their children mostly were without anxiety or with minor anxiety.

CONCLUSION

Buccal midazolam may be safely and efficiently used in sedation of pediatric dental patients.

摘要

目的

为年轻患者提供安全有效的牙科治疗对牙医和儿童来说都是一项挑战。本研究的目的是调查颊部咪达唑仑在牙科儿科患者中的有效性、安全性和可接受性,并将其与口服咪达唑仑进行比较。

方法

18名年龄在2.5至6岁之间不合作的健康儿童在首次就诊时被随机分为颊部咪达唑仑(0.3mg/kg)组或口服咪达唑仑(0.5mg/kg)组,在第二次就诊时以交叉方式使用另一种药物。该研究于2011年11月至2012年6月在德黑兰沙希德大学的儿科牙科诊所进行。记录患者的生命体征和行为评分。患者、操作人员和观察者对所使用的药物不知情。术后,分别通过视觉模拟评分法和问卷对患者和家长的满意度进行评估。显著性水平的P值设定为0.05。

结果

在0、10、20、30分钟及出院时,用药组的生理因素无显著差异。两组在行为参数方面也无显著差异。大多数家长将两种镇静剂评为“有效”或“非常有效”,他们的孩子大多没有焦虑或只有轻微焦虑。

结论

颊部咪达唑仑可安全有效地用于儿科牙科患者的镇静。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c1ea/4268841/7011b0cc6e5a/IJPD-24-198-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c1ea/4268841/ada1d18e77f5/IJPD-24-198-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c1ea/4268841/52f95ebe1034/IJPD-24-198-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c1ea/4268841/7011b0cc6e5a/IJPD-24-198-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c1ea/4268841/ada1d18e77f5/IJPD-24-198-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c1ea/4268841/52f95ebe1034/IJPD-24-198-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c1ea/4268841/7011b0cc6e5a/IJPD-24-198-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of oral and buccal midazolam for pediatric dental sedation: a randomized, cross-over, clinical trial for efficacy, acceptance and safety.口服与颊部应用咪达唑仑用于儿科牙科镇静的比较:一项关于疗效、接受度和安全性的随机交叉临床试验。
Iran J Pediatr. 2014 Apr;24(2):198-206.
2
Comparison of transmucosal midazolam with inhalation sedation for dental extractions in children. A randomized, cross-over, clinical trial.儿童拔牙时经黏膜咪达唑仑与吸入镇静的比较:一项随机、交叉临床试验。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2007 Sep;51(8):1062-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2007.01391.x.
3
Comparison of nitrous oxide/midazolam and nitrous oxide/promethazine for pediatric dental sedation: A randomized, cross-over, clinical trial.氧化亚氮/咪达唑仑与氧化亚氮/异丙嗪用于儿童牙科镇静的比较:一项随机、交叉临床试验。
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2018 Nov-Dec;15(6):411-419.
4
A comparison of the sedative effect of oral versus nasal midazolam combined with nitrous oxide in uncooperative children.口服与鼻内咪达唑仑联合一氧化二氮对不合作儿童镇静效果的比较。
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2015 Oct;16(5):417-24. doi: 10.1007/s40368-015-0187-7. Epub 2015 May 5.
5
Conscious Sedation Efficacy of 0.3 and 0.5 mg/kg Oral Midazolam for Three to Six Year-Old Uncooperative Children Undergoing Dental Treatment: A Clinical Trial.0.3和0.5毫克/千克口服咪达唑仑对3至6岁不合作接受牙科治疗儿童的清醒镇静效果:一项临床试验
J Dent (Tehran). 2016 Mar;13(2):101-107.
6
Post-Discharge Effects and Parents' Opinions of Intranasal Fentanyl with Oral Midazolam Sedation in Pediatric Dental Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study.出院后效应及家长对小儿牙科患者鼻内芬太尼联合口服咪达唑仑镇静的看法:一项横断面研究
Children (Basel). 2022 Jan 22;9(2):142. doi: 10.3390/children9020142.
7
Buccal versus intranasal midazolam sedation for pediatric dental patients.用于儿科牙科患者的口腔与鼻内咪达唑仑镇静效果比较
Pediatr Dent. 2014 Nov-Dec;36(7):483-8.
8
A pilot study of the efficacy of oral midazolam for sedation in pediatric dental patients.口服咪达唑仑用于小儿牙科患者镇静效果的初步研究。
Anesth Prog. 1996 Winter;43(1):1-8.
9
Evaluation of two dosages of oral midazolam as a conscious sedation for physically and neurologically compromised pediatric dental patients.评估两种剂量的口服咪达唑仑对身体和神经功能受损的儿科牙科患者进行清醒镇静的效果。
Pediatr Dent. 1994 Sep-Oct;16(5):350-9.
10
Oral Melatonin Versus Midazolam as Premedication for Intravenous Sedation in Pediatric Dental Patients.口服褪黑素与咪达唑仑用于儿科牙科患者静脉镇静的术前用药比较
J Dent (Tehran). 2018 Sep;15(5):317-324.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of the Efficacy of Buccal Midazolam in Comparison With Intranasal Midazolam Sedation in Uncooperative Children During Dental Treatment.比较口腔咪达唑仑与鼻内咪达唑仑在牙科治疗中对不合作儿童镇静效果的评估。
Int J Dent. 2025 Mar 17;2025:4269519. doi: 10.1155/ijod/4269519. eCollection 2025.
2
Parenting Styles and Sedation Efficacy in Pediatric Dental Care; A Study in Uncooperative Children Aged 4 to 6 Years: Structural Equation Modeling Approach.儿童牙科护理中的育儿方式与镇静效果;一项针对4至6岁不合作儿童的研究:结构方程建模方法
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2024 Jul 30;38:87. doi: 10.47176/mjiri.38.87. eCollection 2024.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Assessment of buccal aerosolized midazolam for pediatric conscious sedation.用于小儿清醒镇静的口腔雾化咪达唑仑评估。
J Investig Clin Dent. 2015 Feb;6(1):40-4. doi: 10.1111/jicd.12062. Epub 2013 Dec 20.
2
A comparison of buccal midazolam and intravenous diazepam for the acute treatment of seizures in children.口腔咪达唑仑与静脉注射地西泮用于儿童癫痫急性治疗的比较。
Iran J Pediatr. 2012 Sep;22(3):303-8.
3
Buccal midazolam for pediatric convulsive seizures: efficacy, safety, and patient acceptability.用于小儿惊厥性癫痫发作的口腔咪达唑仑:疗效、安全性及患者可接受性。
Promethazine hydrochloride reduces children's agitation during ocular examination for trauma.
盐酸异丙嗪可减轻儿童眼部外伤检查期间的躁动。
Eur J Transl Myol. 2022 Sep 8;33(1):10808. doi: 10.4081/ejtm.2022.10808.
4
Post-Discharge Effects and Parents' Opinions of Intranasal Fentanyl with Oral Midazolam Sedation in Pediatric Dental Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study.出院后效应及家长对小儿牙科患者鼻内芬太尼联合口服咪达唑仑镇静的看法:一项横断面研究
Children (Basel). 2022 Jan 22;9(2):142. doi: 10.3390/children9020142.
5
Midazolam and its effect on vital signs and behavior in children under conscious sedation in dentistry.咪达唑仑及其在牙科镇静下儿童生命体征和行为的影响。
Physiol Res. 2020 Sep 30;69(Suppl 2):S305-S314. doi: 10.33549/physiolres.934511.
6
Intranasal midazolam sedation as an effective sedation route in pediatric patients for radiologic imaging in the emergency ward: A single-blind randomized trial.鼻内咪达唑仑镇静作为急诊病房儿科患者放射影像学检查的有效镇静途径:一项单盲随机试验。
Turk J Emerg Med. 2020 Oct 7;20(4):168-174. doi: 10.4103/2452-2473.297461. eCollection 2020 Oct-Dec.
7
Enhancing cooperation during pediatric ultrasound: Oral midazolam versus conventional techniques.小儿超声检查中增强合作的方法:口服咪达唑仑与传统技术对比
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2020 Apr-Jun;36(2):166-171. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_343_17. Epub 2020 Jun 15.
8
Comparison of nitrous oxide/midazolam and nitrous oxide/promethazine for pediatric dental sedation: A randomized, cross-over, clinical trial.氧化亚氮/咪达唑仑与氧化亚氮/异丙嗪用于儿童牙科镇静的比较:一项随机、交叉临床试验。
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2018 Nov-Dec;15(6):411-419.
9
Techniques to administer oral, inhalational, and IV sedation in dentistry.牙科中口服、吸入和静脉镇静的给药技术。
Australas Med J. 2016 Feb 29;9(2):25-32. doi: 10.4066/AMJ.2015.2543. eCollection 2016.
10
Pediatric dental sedation: challenges and opportunities.儿童牙科镇静:挑战与机遇
Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2015 Aug 26;7:97-106. doi: 10.2147/CCIDE.S64250. eCollection 2015.
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2013;7:27-34. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S39233. Epub 2013 Jan 10.
4
Optimising the dose of oral midazolam sedation for dental procedures in children: a prospective, randomised, and controlled study.优化儿童口腔手术中咪达唑仑口服镇静的剂量:一项前瞻性、随机、对照研究。
Int J Paediatr Dent. 2012 Jul;22(4):271-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-263X.2011.01192.x. Epub 2011 Nov 1.
5
The physiologic and behavioral effects of oral and intranasal midazolam in pediatric dental patients.口服和鼻内咪达唑仑对儿童牙科患者的生理和行为影响。
Pediatr Dent. 2010 May-Jun;32(3):229-38.
6
The effect of transmucosal 0.2 mg/kg midazolam premedication on dental anxiety, anaesthetic induction and psychological morbidity in children undergoing general anaesthesia for tooth extraction.经黏膜给予0.2mg/kg咪达唑仑进行术前用药对接受拔牙全身麻醉的儿童的牙科焦虑、麻醉诱导及心理发病率的影响。
Br Dent J. 2009 Jul 11;207(1):E2; discussion 32-3. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2009.570. Epub 2009 Jul 3.
7
An evaluation of the PALS after treatment modelling intervention to reduce dental anxiety in child dental patients.对治疗后PALS模型干预措施进行评估,以降低儿童牙科患者的牙科焦虑。
Int J Paediatr Dent. 2009 Jul;19(4):233-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-263X.2009.00977.x. Epub 2009 Mar 30.
8
Design, analysis, and presentation of crossover trials.交叉试验的设计、分析与呈现
Trials. 2009 Apr 30;10:27. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-10-27.
9
Midazolam conscious sedation in a large Danish municipal dental service for children and adolescents.丹麦一家大型市政儿童和青少年牙科服务机构中的咪达唑仑清醒镇静。
Int J Paediatr Dent. 2008 Jul;18(4):256-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-263X.2007.00902.x. Epub 2008 Mar 6.
10
Comparison of transmucosal midazolam with inhalation sedation for dental extractions in children. A randomized, cross-over, clinical trial.儿童拔牙时经黏膜咪达唑仑与吸入镇静的比较:一项随机、交叉临床试验。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2007 Sep;51(8):1062-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2007.01391.x.