• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用多层二维自旋回波平面回波成像(SE-EPI)和三维反转重建的磁共振弹性成像评估肾硬度的可靠性。

Reliability of magnetic resonance elastography using multislice two-dimensional spin-echo echo-planar imaging (SE-EPI) and three-dimensional inversion reconstruction for assessing renal stiffness.

作者信息

Low Gavin, Owen Nicola E, Joubert Ilse, Patterson Andrew J, Graves Martin J, Glaser Kevin J, Alexander Graeme J M, Lomas David J

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, University of Cambridge, England, United Kingdom.

University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015 Sep;42(3):844-50. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24826. Epub 2014 Dec 24.

DOI:10.1002/jmri.24826
PMID:25537823
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4560097/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the reliability of MRE using a spin-echo echo-planar imaging (SE-EPI) renal MRE technique in healthy volunteers.

METHODS

Institutional review board approved prospective study in which all participants provided written informed consent. Sixteen healthy volunteers comprising seven males and nine females with a median age of 35 years (age range: 23 to 59 years) were included. Coronal 90 Hz and 60 Hz MRE acquisitions were performed twice within a 30-min interval between examinations. Renal MRE reliability was assessed by (i) test-retest repeatability, and (ii) inter-rater agreement between two independent readers. The MRE-measured averaged renal stiffness values were evaluated using: intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Bland-Altman and the within-subject coefficient of variation (COV).

RESULTS

For test-retest repeatability, Bland-Altman showed a mean stiffness difference between examinations of 0.07 kPa (95% limits of agreement: -1.41, 1.54) at 90 Hz and 0.01 kPa (95% limits of agreement: -0.51, 0.53) at 60 Hz. Coefficient of repeatability was 1.47 kPa and 0.52 kPa at 90 Hz and 60 Hz, respectively. The within-subject COV was 13.6% and 7.7% at 90 Hz and 60 Hz, respectively. ICC values were 0.922 and 0.907 for test-retest repeatability and 0.998 and 0.989 for inter-rater agreement, respectively (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

SE-EPI renal MRE is a reliable technique.

摘要

背景

使用自旋回波平面成像(SE-EPI)肾脏磁共振弹性成像(MRE)技术评估健康志愿者中MRE的可靠性。

方法

经机构审查委员会批准的前瞻性研究,所有参与者均提供书面知情同意书。纳入16名健康志愿者,其中7名男性和9名女性,中位年龄35岁(年龄范围:23至59岁)。在两次检查之间的30分钟间隔内,对冠状面90 Hz和60 Hz的MRE进行两次采集。通过(i)重测重复性和(ii)两名独立阅片者之间的阅片者间一致性评估肾脏MRE的可靠性。使用组内相关系数(ICC)、Bland-Altman法和受试者内变异系数(COV)评估MRE测量的平均肾脏硬度值。

结果

对于重测重复性,Bland-Altman法显示,90 Hz时两次检查之间的平均硬度差异为0.07 kPa(95%一致性界限:-1.41,1.54),60 Hz时为0.01 kPa(95%一致性界限:-0.51,0.53)。90 Hz和60 Hz时的重复性系数分别为1.47 kPa和0.52 kPa。90 Hz和60 Hz时受试者内COV分别为13.6%和7.7%。重测重复性的ICC值分别为0.922和0.907,阅片者间一致性的ICC值分别为0.998和0.989(P < 0.001)。

结论

SE-EPI肾脏MRE是一种可靠的技术。

相似文献

1
Reliability of magnetic resonance elastography using multislice two-dimensional spin-echo echo-planar imaging (SE-EPI) and three-dimensional inversion reconstruction for assessing renal stiffness.使用多层二维自旋回波平面回波成像(SE-EPI)和三维反转重建的磁共振弹性成像评估肾硬度的可靠性。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015 Sep;42(3):844-50. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24826. Epub 2014 Dec 24.
2
Respiratory-triggered spin-echo echo-planar imaging-based mr elastography for evaluating liver stiffness.基于呼吸触发的自旋回波回波平面成像的磁共振弹性成像评估肝脏硬度。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019 Aug;50(2):391-396. doi: 10.1002/jmri.26610. Epub 2018 Dec 24.
3
Magnetic Resonance Elastography of the Liver: Qualitative and Quantitative Comparison of Gradient Echo and Spin Echo Echoplanar Imaging Sequences.肝脏磁共振弹性成像:梯度回波与自旋回波平面回波成像序列的定性和定量比较
Invest Radiol. 2016 Sep;51(9):575-81. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000269.
4
Test-retest reliability of 3D EPI MR elastography of the pancreas.胰腺三维回波平面成像磁共振弹性成像的重测信度
Clin Radiol. 2016 Oct;71(10):1068.e7-1068.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2016.03.014. Epub 2016 Apr 27.
5
Magnetic resonance elastography of healthy livers at 3.0 T: Normal liver stiffness measured by SE-EPI and GRE.3.0T 磁共振弹性成像技术对健康肝脏的研究:SE-EPI 和 GRE 测量正常肝脏硬度值。
Eur J Radiol. 2018 Oct;107:46-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.08.015. Epub 2018 Aug 16.
6
Magnetic resonance elastography of the supraspinatus muscle: A preliminary study on test-retest repeatability and wave quality with different frequencies and image filtering.冈上肌的磁共振弹性成像:不同频率和图像滤波下的测试-再测试重复性和波质量的初步研究。
Magn Reson Imaging. 2020 Sep;71:27-36. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2020.04.009. Epub 2020 Apr 20.
7
Magnetic Resonance Elastography of Intervertebral Discs: Spin-Echo Echo-Planar Imaging Sequence Validation.椎间盘磁共振弹性成像:自旋回波回波平面成像序列验证。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2022 Dec;56(6):1722-1732. doi: 10.1002/jmri.28151. Epub 2022 Mar 15.
8
Spin-echo Echo-planar Imaging MR Elastography versus Gradient-echo MR Elastography for Assessment of Liver Stiffness in Children and Young Adults Suspected of Having Liver Disease.自旋回波回波平面成像磁共振弹性成像与梯度回波磁共振弹性成像在儿童和青年疑似肝病患者肝硬度评估中的比较。
Radiology. 2017 Mar;282(3):761-770. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2016160589. Epub 2016 Oct 10.
9
Comparison of spin-echo echo-planar imaging magnetic resonance elastography with gradient-recalled echo magnetic resonance elastography and their correlation with transient elastography.对比自旋回波回波平面成像磁共振弹性成像与梯度回波磁共振弹性成像及其与瞬时弹性成像的相关性。
Diagn Interv Radiol. 2022 Jul;28(4):294-300. doi: 10.5152/dir.2022.201014.
10
Magnetic resonance elastography for estimating in vivo stiffness of the abdominal aorta using cardiac-gated spin-echo echo-planar imaging: a feasibility study.应用心脏门控自旋回波回波平面成像技术的磁共振弹性成像估计腹主动脉体内硬度:一项可行性研究。
NMR Biomed. 2021 Jan;34(1):e4420. doi: 10.1002/nbm.4420. Epub 2020 Oct 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Improving the Accuracy and Repeatability of Renal Stiffness Measurement With Magnetic Resonance Elastography: Influence of Vibration Frequency, Acquisition Orientation, and Postprocessing-A Phantom and Volunteer Study.提高磁共振弹性成像测量肾脏硬度的准确性和可重复性:振动频率、采集方向和后处理的影响——一项体模和志愿者研究
NMR Biomed. 2025 Jun;38(6):e70054. doi: 10.1002/nbm.70054.
2
Liver Magnetic Resonance Elastography: Focus on Methodology, Technique, and Feasibility.肝脏磁共振弹性成像:聚焦方法、技术与可行性。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Feb 9;14(4):379. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14040379.
3
Magnetic resonance elastography resolving all gross anatomical segments of the kidney during controlled hydration.在控制性水化过程中对肾脏所有大体解剖节段进行分辨的磁共振弹性成像。
Front Physiol. 2024 Feb 7;15:1327407. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2024.1327407. eCollection 2024.
4
Advances in imaging techniques to assess kidney fibrosis.评估肾纤维化的影像学技术进展。
Ren Fail. 2023 Dec;45(1):2171887. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2023.2171887.
5
MR Elastography of the Abdomen: Experimental Protocols.腹部磁共振弹性成像:实验方案。
Methods Mol Biol. 2021;2216:519-546. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-0978-1_32.
6
Assessment of nanoindentation in stiffness measurement of soft biomaterials: kidney, liver, spleen and uterus.评估纳米压痕在软生物材料硬度测量中的应用:肾脏、肝脏、脾脏和子宫。
Sci Rep. 2020 Nov 2;10(1):18784. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-75738-7.
7
Imaging brain function with simultaneous BOLD and viscoelasticity contrast: fMRI/fMRE.用同时的 BOLD 和粘弹性对比进行脑功能成像:fMRI/fMRE。
Neuroimage. 2020 May 1;211:116592. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116592. Epub 2020 Feb 1.
8
Magnetic resonance elastography-derived stiffness of the kidneys and its correlation with water perfusion.肾脏磁共振弹性成像硬度及其与水灌注的相关性。
NMR Biomed. 2020 Apr;33(4):e4237. doi: 10.1002/nbm.4237. Epub 2019 Dec 30.
9
The utility of magnetic resonance imaging for noninvasive evaluation of diabetic nephropathy.磁共振成像在糖尿病肾病无创评估中的应用。
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2020 Jun 1;35(6):970-978. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfz066.
10
Magnetic Resonance Elastography of kidneys: SE-EPI MRE reproducibility and its comparison to GRE MRE.肾脏磁共振弹性成像:SE-EPI MRE 的可重复性及其与 GRE MRE 的比较。
NMR Biomed. 2019 Nov;32(11):e4141. doi: 10.1002/nbm.4141. Epub 2019 Jul 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Side effects of radiographic contrast media: pathogenesis, risk factors, and prevention.放射造影剂的副作用:发病机制、危险因素及预防
Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:741018. doi: 10.1155/2014/741018. Epub 2014 May 11.
2
Magnetic resonance elastography noninvasively detects in vivo renal medullary fibrosis secondary to swine renal artery stenosis.磁共振弹性成像技术可无创检测猪肾动脉狭窄所致活体肾髓质纤维化。
Invest Radiol. 2013 Feb;48(2):61-8. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e31827a4990.
3
Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis and gadolinium-based contrast media: updated ESUR Contrast Medium Safety Committee guidelines.肾源性系统性纤维化与钆类对比剂:ESUR 对比剂安全委员会更新指南。
Eur Radiol. 2013 Feb;23(2):307-18. doi: 10.1007/s00330-012-2597-9. Epub 2012 Aug 4.
4
A comparison of MR elastography and 31P MR spectroscopy with histological staging of liver fibrosis.MR 弹性成像与 31P 磁共振波谱与肝纤维化组织学分期的比较。
Eur Radiol. 2012 Dec;22(12):2790-7. doi: 10.1007/s00330-012-2527-x. Epub 2012 Jul 1.
5
Supersonic shear wave elastography of in vivo pig kidney: influence of blood pressure, urinary pressure and tissue anisotropy.体内猪肾的超声剪切波弹性成像:血压、尿压和组织各向异性的影响。
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2012 Sep;38(9):1559-67. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2012.04.013. Epub 2012 Jun 12.
6
MR elastography in renal transplant patients and correlation with renal allograft biopsy: a feasibility study.磁共振弹性成像在肾移植患者中的应用及与肾移植活检的相关性:一项可行性研究。
Acad Radiol. 2012 Jul;19(7):834-41. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2012.03.003. Epub 2012 Apr 13.
7
Contrast induced nephropathy: updated ESUR Contrast Media Safety Committee guidelines.对比剂肾病:更新的 ESUR 对比剂安全委员会指南。
Eur Radiol. 2011 Dec;21(12):2527-41. doi: 10.1007/s00330-011-2225-0. Epub 2011 Aug 25.
8
Magnetic resonance elastography of the kidneys: feasibility and reproducibility in young healthy adults.肾脏磁共振弹性成像:年轻健康成年人的可行性和可重复性。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011 Oct;34(4):880-6. doi: 10.1002/jmri.22670. Epub 2011 Jul 18.
9
Test-retest repeatability of MR elastography for noninvasive liver fibrosis assessment in hepatitis C.磁共振弹性成像用于丙型肝炎患者无创性肝纤维化评估的重测重复性。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011 Oct;34(4):947-55. doi: 10.1002/jmri.22716. Epub 2011 Jul 12.
10
Stiffness imaging of the kidney and adjacent abdominal tissues measured simultaneously using magnetic resonance elastography.采用磁共振弹性成像技术同时对肾脏和相邻腹部组织进行僵硬度成像。
Clin Imaging. 2011 Jul-Aug;35(4):284-7. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2010.07.009.