Suppr超能文献

使用多层二维自旋回波平面回波成像(SE-EPI)和三维反转重建的磁共振弹性成像评估肾硬度的可靠性。

Reliability of magnetic resonance elastography using multislice two-dimensional spin-echo echo-planar imaging (SE-EPI) and three-dimensional inversion reconstruction for assessing renal stiffness.

作者信息

Low Gavin, Owen Nicola E, Joubert Ilse, Patterson Andrew J, Graves Martin J, Glaser Kevin J, Alexander Graeme J M, Lomas David J

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, University of Cambridge, England, United Kingdom.

University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015 Sep;42(3):844-50. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24826. Epub 2014 Dec 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the reliability of MRE using a spin-echo echo-planar imaging (SE-EPI) renal MRE technique in healthy volunteers.

METHODS

Institutional review board approved prospective study in which all participants provided written informed consent. Sixteen healthy volunteers comprising seven males and nine females with a median age of 35 years (age range: 23 to 59 years) were included. Coronal 90 Hz and 60 Hz MRE acquisitions were performed twice within a 30-min interval between examinations. Renal MRE reliability was assessed by (i) test-retest repeatability, and (ii) inter-rater agreement between two independent readers. The MRE-measured averaged renal stiffness values were evaluated using: intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Bland-Altman and the within-subject coefficient of variation (COV).

RESULTS

For test-retest repeatability, Bland-Altman showed a mean stiffness difference between examinations of 0.07 kPa (95% limits of agreement: -1.41, 1.54) at 90 Hz and 0.01 kPa (95% limits of agreement: -0.51, 0.53) at 60 Hz. Coefficient of repeatability was 1.47 kPa and 0.52 kPa at 90 Hz and 60 Hz, respectively. The within-subject COV was 13.6% and 7.7% at 90 Hz and 60 Hz, respectively. ICC values were 0.922 and 0.907 for test-retest repeatability and 0.998 and 0.989 for inter-rater agreement, respectively (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

SE-EPI renal MRE is a reliable technique.

摘要

背景

使用自旋回波平面成像(SE-EPI)肾脏磁共振弹性成像(MRE)技术评估健康志愿者中MRE的可靠性。

方法

经机构审查委员会批准的前瞻性研究,所有参与者均提供书面知情同意书。纳入16名健康志愿者,其中7名男性和9名女性,中位年龄35岁(年龄范围:23至59岁)。在两次检查之间的30分钟间隔内,对冠状面90 Hz和60 Hz的MRE进行两次采集。通过(i)重测重复性和(ii)两名独立阅片者之间的阅片者间一致性评估肾脏MRE的可靠性。使用组内相关系数(ICC)、Bland-Altman法和受试者内变异系数(COV)评估MRE测量的平均肾脏硬度值。

结果

对于重测重复性,Bland-Altman法显示,90 Hz时两次检查之间的平均硬度差异为0.07 kPa(95%一致性界限:-1.41,1.54),60 Hz时为0.01 kPa(95%一致性界限:-0.51,0.53)。90 Hz和60 Hz时的重复性系数分别为1.47 kPa和0.52 kPa。90 Hz和60 Hz时受试者内COV分别为13.6%和7.7%。重测重复性的ICC值分别为0.922和0.907,阅片者间一致性的ICC值分别为0.998和0.989(P < 0.001)。

结论

SE-EPI肾脏MRE是一种可靠的技术。

相似文献

4
Test-retest reliability of 3D EPI MR elastography of the pancreas.胰腺三维回波平面成像磁共振弹性成像的重测信度
Clin Radiol. 2016 Oct;71(10):1068.e7-1068.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2016.03.014. Epub 2016 Apr 27.

引用本文的文献

4
Advances in imaging techniques to assess kidney fibrosis.评估肾纤维化的影像学技术进展。
Ren Fail. 2023 Dec;45(1):2171887. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2023.2171887.
5
MR Elastography of the Abdomen: Experimental Protocols.腹部磁共振弹性成像:实验方案。
Methods Mol Biol. 2021;2216:519-546. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-0978-1_32.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验