Kohen Amnon
Department of Chemistry, The University of Iowa , Iowa City, Iowa 52242, United States.
Acc Chem Res. 2015 Feb 17;48(2):466-73. doi: 10.1021/ar500322s. Epub 2014 Dec 24.
The role of the enzyme's dynamic motions in catalysis is at the center of heated contemporary debates among both theoreticians and experimentalists. Resolving these apparent disputes is of both intellectual and practical importance: incorporation of enzyme dynamics could be critical for any calculation of enzymatic function and may have profound implications for structure-based drug design and the design of biomimetic catalysts. Analysis of the literature suggests that while part of the dispute may reflect substantial differences between theoretical approaches, much of the debate is semantic. For example, the term "protein dynamics" is often used by some researchers when addressing motions that are in thermal equilibrium with their environment, while other researchers only use this term for nonequilibrium events. The last cases are those in which thermal energy is "stored" in a specific protein mode and "used" for catalysis before it can dissipate to its environment (i.e., "nonstatistical dynamics"). This terminology issue aside, a debate has arisen among theoreticians around the roles of nonstatistical vs statistical dynamics in catalysis. However, the author knows of no experimental findings available today that examined this question in enzyme catalyzed reactions. Another source of perhaps nonsubstantial argument might stem from the varying time scales of enzymatic motions, which range from seconds to femtoseconds. Motions at different time scales play different roles in the many events along the catalytic cascade (reactant binding, reprotonation of reactants, structural rearrangement toward the transition state, product release, etc.). In several cases, when various experimental tools have been used to probe catalytic events at differing time scales, illusory contradictions seem to have emerged. In this Account, recent attempts to sort the merits of those questions are discussed along with possible future directions. A possible summary of current studies could be that enzyme, substrate, and solvent dynamics contribute to enzyme catalyzed reactions in several ways: first via mutual "induced-fit" shifting of their conformational ensemble upon binding; then via thermal search of the conformational space toward the reaction's transition-state (TS) and the rare event of the barrier crossing toward products, which is likely to be on faster time scales then the first and following events; and finally via the dynamics associated with products release, which are rate-limiting for many enzymatic reactions. From a chemical perspective, close to the TS, enzymatic systems seem to stiffen, restricting motions orthogonal to the chemical coordinate and enabling dynamics along the reaction coordinate to occur selectively. Studies of how enzymes evolved to support those efficient dynamics at various time scales are still in their infancy, and further experiments and calculations are needed to reveal these phenomena in both enzymes and uncatalyzed reactions.
酶的动态运动在催化过程中的作用是理论家和实验家们当前激烈争论的核心。解决这些明显的争议在学术和实践上都具有重要意义:纳入酶动力学对于任何酶功能的计算可能至关重要,并且可能对基于结构的药物设计和仿生催化剂的设计产生深远影响。对文献的分析表明,虽然部分争议可能反映了理论方法之间的实质性差异,但许多争论是语义上的。例如,一些研究人员在讨论与环境处于热平衡的运动时经常使用“蛋白质动力学”一词,而其他研究人员仅将该术语用于非平衡事件。后一种情况是指热能在特定蛋白质模式中“存储”并在其耗散到环境之前“用于”催化的情况(即“非统计动力学”)。撇开这个术语问题不谈,理论家们围绕非统计动力学与统计动力学在催化中的作用展开了一场争论。然而,作者所知的是,目前尚无实验结果来研究酶催化反应中的这个问题。另一个可能并非实质性的争论来源可能源于酶促运动的不同时间尺度,其范围从秒到飞秒。在催化级联反应的许多事件(反应物结合、反应物的再质子化、向过渡态的结构重排、产物释放等)中,不同时间尺度的运动发挥着不同的作用。在某些情况下,当使用各种实验工具来探测不同时间尺度的催化事件时,似乎出现了虚幻的矛盾。在本综述中,将讨论最近对这些问题的优点进行梳理的尝试以及可能的未来方向。当前研究的一个可能总结是,酶、底物和溶剂动力学以多种方式促进酶催化反应:首先是通过结合时它们构象集合的相互“诱导契合”转变;然后是通过对构象空间进行热搜索以朝向反应的过渡态(TS)以及跨越障碍生成产物的罕见事件,这可能比第一个及后续事件的时间尺度更快;最后是通过与产物释放相关的动力学,这对许多酶促反应来说是限速步骤。从化学角度来看,接近过渡态时,酶系统似乎会变硬,限制与化学坐标正交的运动,并使沿反应坐标的动力学能够选择性地发生。关于酶如何进化以在各种时间尺度上支持这些高效动力学的研究仍处于起步阶段,需要进一步的实验和计算来揭示酶促反应和非催化反应中的这些现象。