Ohsugi Hironori, Murata Shin, Kubo Atsuko, Hachiya Mizuki, Hirao Aya, Fujiwara Kazuhiko, Kamijou Kenji
Faculty of Health Science, Kyoto Tachibana University, Japan.
Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Nishikyusyu University, Japan.
J Phys Ther Sci. 2014 Dec;26(12):1861-3. doi: 10.1589/jpts.26.1861. Epub 2014 Dec 25.
[Purpose] The purpose of this study was to evaluate the lower limb muscle strength of the community-dwelling elderly, with or without cognitive decline, using isometric knee extension strength (IKES) and the 30-second chair stand test (CS-30). [Subjects] A total of 306 community-dwelling elderly participated in this study. Assessment items were the CS-30, IKES, Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), and Trail-Making Test Part A (TMT-A). [Methods] Participants were divided into three groups according to their MMSE score: cognitive impairment (MMSE ≤ 24), cognitive decline (MMSE 25 to 27), and normal (MMSE ≥ 28). We compared IKES and CS-30 among the three groups. [Results] IKES was not significantly different among the three groups. However, the CS-30 was significantly different among the three groups. Upon further analysis the CS-30 score of each group, when adjusted for age and TMT-A, did not indicate a significant difference. [Conclusion] These results suggest that the lower limb muscle strength of the elderly does not differ with cognitive decline. Moreover, we suggest that when using the CS-30 score as an indicator of lower limb muscle strength attentional function should be taken into account.
[目的]本研究旨在使用等长膝关节伸展力量(IKES)和30秒坐立试验(CS - 30)评估社区居住老年人(无论有无认知功能减退)的下肢肌肉力量。[对象]共有306名社区居住老年人参与本研究。评估项目包括CS - 30、IKES、简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)和连线测验A部分(TMT - A)。[方法]参与者根据其MMSE评分分为三组:认知障碍(MMSE≤24)、认知功能减退(MMSE 25至27)和正常(MMSE≥28)。我们比较了三组之间的IKES和CS - 30。[结果]三组之间IKES无显著差异。然而,三组之间CS - 30有显著差异。在对每组的CS - 30评分进行进一步分析时,在调整年龄和TMT - A后,未显示出显著差异。[结论]这些结果表明老年人的下肢肌肉力量不会因认知功能减退而有所不同。此外,我们建议在将CS - 30评分用作下肢肌肉力量指标时,应考虑注意力功能。