Jabeen Farhat, Chaudhry Abdul Shakoor, Manzoor Sadia, Shaheen Tayybah
Department of Zoology, Wildlife & Fisheries, GC University Faisalabad, Faisalabad, Pakistan,
Environ Monit Assess. 2015 Feb;187(2):29. doi: 10.1007/s10661-015-4273-4. Epub 2015 Jan 30.
This 3 × 3 factorial study assessed pyrethroids, carbamates and neonicotenoids groups of pesticides in replicated samples of three fish species from low (S1, reference), medium (S2) and heavy (S3) polluted sites receiving agricultural run-offs around the Indus River. Water and sediment samples from the same sites were also analysed for these pesticides by using high-performance liquid chromatography. Out of nine investigated pesticides, only three pesticides (deltamethrin, carbofuran and cypermethrin) were detected in fish and sediment samples. Deltamethrin in Cyprinus carpio ranged from 0.490 to 0.839 μg/g, mostly exceeding 0.5 μg/g as the maximum residual limit suggested by FAO-WHO, whereas it ranged from 0.214 to 0.318 μg/g in the sampled sediments. The carbofuran concentrations were 0.0425-0.066 and 0.613-0.946 μg/g in Labeo rohita and Channa marulius muscles respectively and 0.069-0.081 μg/g in the corresponding sediment samples. These values were either higher or lower than the maximum limit (0.1 μg/g) as suggested by FAO-WHO. Conversely, the cypermethrin concentration ranged from 0.141 to 0.174 in Ch. marulius and 0.183-0.197 μg/g in sediments which were both below the FAO-WHO maximum limit of 2 μg/g. No pesticide residues were detected in water from these sampling sites. Most selected physicochemical variables were within the acceptable range of World Health Organization for the water quality for aquatic life. The detected pesticide contents were mostly higher in fish muscles from heavily polluted sites. This is worrying because these pesticides may pose health risks for the fish and people of the study area. However, a preliminary risk assessment indicated that the calculated daily intake of detected pesticides by people consuming fish from the Indus River was low and did not present an immediate risk to the fish-consuming people. This study may be used as a benchmark to determine the safety of fish meat in order to develop intervention strategies to maintain the water quality and to protect the health of fish and fish-consuming people.
这项3×3析因研究评估了来自印度河周边受农业径流污染程度低(S1,对照)、中(S2)、重(S3)的三个地点的三种鱼类重复样本中的拟除虫菊酯类、氨基甲酸酯类和新烟碱类农药。还使用高效液相色谱法对同一地点的水和沉积物样本进行了这些农药的分析。在九种被调查的农药中,仅在鱼类和沉积物样本中检测到三种农药(溴氰菊酯、克百威和氯氰菊酯)。鲤鱼体内溴氰菊酯含量在0.490至0.839μg/g之间,大多超过了粮农组织 - 世界卫生组织建议的最大残留限量0.5μg/g,而在采样沉积物中其含量在0.214至0.318μg/g之间。在印度魮和线鳢肌肉中克百威浓度分别为0.0425 - 0.066μg/g和0.613 - 0.946μg/g,在相应沉积物样本中为0.069 - 0.081μg/g。这些值高于或低于粮农组织 - 世界卫生组织建议的最大限量(0.1μg/g)。相反,线鳢体内氯氰菊酯浓度在0.141至0.174μg/g之间,沉积物中为0.183 - 0.197μg/g,均低于粮农组织 - 世界卫生组织2μg/g的最大限量。在这些采样地点的水中未检测到农药残留。大多数选定的理化变量在世界卫生组织规定的水生生物水质可接受范围内。在污染严重地点的鱼类肌肉中检测到的农药含量大多更高。这令人担忧,因为这些农药可能对研究区域的鱼类和人类构成健康风险。然而,初步风险评估表明,食用印度河鱼类的人群对检测到的农药的计算每日摄入量较低,对食用鱼类的人群不构成直接风险。本研究可作为确定鱼肉安全性的基准依据,以便制定干预策略来维持水质并保护鱼类和食用鱼类人群的健康。