• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Traumatic brain injury imaging research roadmap.创伤性脑损伤影像学研究路线图。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015 Mar;36(3):E12-23. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4254. Epub 2015 Feb 5.
2
Normative Neuroimaging Library: Designing a Comprehensive and Demographically Diverse Dataset of Healthy Controls to Support Traumatic Brain Injury Diagnostic and Therapeutic Development.规范神经影像库:设计一个全面且人口统计学上多样化的健康对照数据集,以支持创伤性脑损伤的诊断和治疗发展。
J Neurotrauma. 2024 Dec;41(23-24):2497-2512. doi: 10.1089/neu.2024.0128. Epub 2024 Sep 5.
3
Exploring Serum Biomarkers for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury探索轻度创伤性脑损伤的血清生物标志物
4
Translational Metabolomics of Head Injury: Exploring Dysfunctional Cerebral Metabolism with Ex Vivo NMR Spectroscopy-Based Metabolite Quantification头部损伤的转化代谢组学:基于体外核磁共振波谱的代谢物定量分析探索脑代谢功能障碍
5
Neuropathology of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: Correlation to Neurocognitive and Neurobehavioral Findings轻度创伤性脑损伤的神经病理学:与神经认知和神经行为结果的相关性
6
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Application in the Area of Mild and Acute Traumatic Brain Injury: Implications for Diagnostic Markers?磁共振成像在轻度和急性创伤性脑损伤领域的应用:对诊断标志物有何启示?
7
Neuroimaging and traumatic brain injury: State of the field and voids in translational knowledge.神经影像学与创伤性脑损伤:该领域现状及转化知识的空白
Mol Cell Neurosci. 2015 May;66(Pt B):103-13. doi: 10.1016/j.mcn.2015.03.017. Epub 2015 Mar 27.
8
Imaging assessment of traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤的影像学评估。
Postgrad Med J. 2016 Jan;92(1083):41-50. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2014-133211. Epub 2015 Nov 30.
9
Acute stroke imaging research roadmap.急性卒中成像研究路线图。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008 May;29(5):e23-30. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.512319.
10
Acute stroke imaging research roadmap.急性中风成像研究路线图。
Stroke. 2008 May;39(5):1621-8. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.512319. Epub 2008 Apr 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Diffusion tensor imaging in the courtroom: Distinction between scientific specificity and legally admissible evidence.法庭中的扩散张量成像:科学特异性与法律可采证据之间的区别。
World J Clin Cases. 2023 Jul 6;11(19):4477-4497. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i19.4477.
2
Increased glymphatic system activity in patients with mild traumatic brain injury.轻度创伤性脑损伤患者的类淋巴系统活性增强。
Front Neurol. 2023 May 12;14:1148878. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1148878. eCollection 2023.
3
Face mask recognition system using CNN model.使用卷积神经网络(CNN)模型的口罩识别系统。
Neurosci Inform. 2022 Sep;2(3):100035. doi: 10.1016/j.neuri.2021.100035. Epub 2021 Dec 9.
4
Amide Proton Transfer-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Detecting Severity and Predicting Outcome after Traumatic Brain Injury in Rats.酰胺质子转移加权磁共振成像用于检测大鼠创伤性脑损伤的严重程度及预测预后
Neurotrauma Rep. 2022 Jul 15;3(1):261-275. doi: 10.1089/neur.2021.0064. eCollection 2022.
5
Update in Neurocritical Care: a summary of the 2018 Paris international conference of the French Society of Intensive Care.神经重症监护最新进展:法国重症监护学会2018年巴黎国际会议综述
Ann Intensive Care. 2019 Apr 16;9(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s13613-019-0523-x.
6
Neuroimaging of Traumatic Brain Injury.创伤性脑损伤的神经影像学
Med Sci (Basel). 2018 Dec 20;7(1):2. doi: 10.3390/medsci7010002.
7
White matter microstructural abnormalities in blast-exposed combat veterans: accounting for potential pre-injury factors using consanguineous controls.爆炸暴露的退伍军人的白质微观结构异常:使用近亲对照来解释潜在的伤前因素。
Neuroradiology. 2018 Oct;60(10):1019-1033. doi: 10.1007/s00234-018-2070-9. Epub 2018 Aug 17.
8
Alterations of Parenchymal Microstructure, Neuronal Connectivity, and Cerebrovascular Resistance at Adolescence after Mild-to-Moderate Traumatic Brain Injury in Early Development.发育期轻度至中度创伤性脑损伤后青少年脑实质微观结构、神经元连接和脑血管阻力的改变。
J Neurotrauma. 2019 Feb 15;36(4):601-608. doi: 10.1089/neu.2018.5741. Epub 2018 Aug 13.
9
The vast potential and bright future of neuroimaging.神经影像学的巨大潜力和光明前景。
Br J Radiol. 2018 Jul;91(1087):20170505. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20170505. Epub 2018 Jun 6.
10
Orthopedic Injured versus Uninjured Comparison Groups for Neuroimaging Research in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.骨科损伤与未损伤比较组在轻度创伤性脑损伤的神经影像学研究中的应用。
J Neurotrauma. 2019 Jan 15;36(2):239-249. doi: 10.1089/neu.2017.5513. Epub 2018 Oct 10.

本文引用的文献

1
A longitudinal evaluation of diffusion kurtosis imaging in patients with mild traumatic brain injury.轻度创伤性脑损伤患者扩散峰度成像的纵向评估。
Brain Inj. 2015;29(1):47-57. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2014.947628. Epub 2014 Sep 26.
2
Single-subject-based whole-brain MEG slow-wave imaging approach for detecting abnormality in patients with mild traumatic brain injury.基于单受试者的全脑脑磁图慢波成像方法用于检测轻度创伤性脑损伤患者的异常情况。
Neuroimage Clin. 2014 Jun 16;5:109-19. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2014.06.004. eCollection 2014.
3
Chronology and chronicity of altered resting-state functional connectivity after traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤后静息态功能连接改变的时间顺序和慢性化
J Neurotrauma. 2015 Feb 15;32(4):252-64. doi: 10.1089/neu.2013.3318. Epub 2014 Dec 10.
4
Posttraumatic epilepsy - disease or comorbidity?创伤后癫痫——是一种疾病还是合并症?
Epilepsy Behav. 2014 Sep;38:19-24. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2014.01.013. Epub 2014 Feb 12.
5
Blockade of tumour necrosis factor-α in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis reveals differential effects on the antigen-specific immune response and central nervous system histopathology.在实验性自身免疫性脑脊髓炎中阻断肿瘤坏死因子-α揭示了对抗原特异性免疫反应和中枢神经系统组织病理学的不同影响。
Clin Exp Immunol. 2014 Jan;175(1):41-8. doi: 10.1111/cei.12209.
6
Relation between cingulum injury and cognition in chronic patients with traumatic brain injury; diffusion tensor tractography study.慢性创伤性脑损伤患者扣带回损伤与认知的关系:弥散张量纤维束成像研究。
NeuroRehabilitation. 2013;33(3):465-71. doi: 10.3233/NRE-130979.
7
Transforming research and clinical knowledge in traumatic brain injury pilot: multicenter implementation of the common data elements for traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤研究和临床知识转化:创伤性脑损伤通用数据元素的多中心实施。
J Neurotrauma. 2013 Nov 15;30(22):1831-44. doi: 10.1089/neu.2013.2970. Epub 2013 Sep 24.
8
Progress in developing common data elements for traumatic brain injury research: version two--the end of the beginning.创伤性脑损伤研究中通用数据元素的开发进展:第二版——开始的结束。
J Neurotrauma. 2013 Nov 15;30(22):1852-61. doi: 10.1089/neu.2013.2938. Epub 2013 Sep 9.
9
Complexity analysis of resting state magnetoencephalography activity in traumatic brain injury patients.创伤性脑损伤患者静息态脑磁图活动的复杂性分析。
J Neurotrauma. 2013 Oct 15;30(20):1702-9. doi: 10.1089/neu.2012.2679. Epub 2013 Aug 31.
10
Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging activity and connectivity and cognitive outcome in traumatic brain injury.颅脑创伤后静息态功能磁共振成像活动和连接与认知结局。
JAMA Neurol. 2013 Jul;70(7):845-51. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2013.38.

创伤性脑损伤影像学研究路线图。

Traumatic brain injury imaging research roadmap.

作者信息

Wintermark M, Coombs L, Druzgal T J, Field A S, Filippi C G, Hicks R, Horton R, Lui Y W, Law M, Mukherjee P, Norbash A, Riedy G, Sanelli P C, Stone J R, Sze G, Tilkin M, Whitlow C T, Wilde E A, York G, Provenzale J M

机构信息

From the Neuroradiology Division (M.W.), Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California

American College of Radiology (L.C., M.T., R. Horton), Reston, Virginia.

出版信息

AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015 Mar;36(3):E12-23. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4254. Epub 2015 Feb 5.

DOI:10.3174/ajnr.A4254
PMID:
25655872
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8013059/
Abstract

The past decade has seen impressive advances in the types of neuroimaging information that can be acquired in patients with traumatic brain injury. However, despite this increase in information, understanding of the contribution of this information to prognostic accuracy and treatment pathways for patients is limited. Available techniques often allow us to infer the presence of microscopic changes indicative of alterations in physiology and function in brain tissue. However, because histologic confirmation is typically lacking, conclusions reached by using these techniques remain solely inferential in almost all cases. Hence, a need exists for validation of these techniques by using data from large population samples that are obtained in a uniform manner, analyzed according to well-accepted procedures, and correlated with closely monitored clinical outcomes. At present, many of these approaches remain confined to population-based research rather than diagnosis at an individual level, particularly with regard to traumatic brain injury that is mild or moderate in degree. A need and a priority exist for patient-centered tools that will allow advanced neuroimaging tools to be brought into clinical settings. One barrier to developing these tools is a lack of an age-, sex-, and comorbidities-stratified, sequence-specific, reference imaging data base that could provide a clear understanding of normal variations across populations. Such a data base would provide researchers and clinicians with the information necessary to develop computational tools for the patient-based interpretation of advanced neuroimaging studies in the clinical setting. The recent "Joint ASNR-ACR HII-ASFNR TBI Workshop: Bringing Advanced Neuroimaging for Traumatic Brain Injury into the Clinic" on May 23, 2014, in Montreal, Quebec, Canada, brought together neuroradiologists, neurologists, psychiatrists, neuropsychologists, neuroimaging scientists, members of the National Institute of Neurologic Disorders and Stroke, industry representatives, and other traumatic brain injury stakeholders to attempt to reach consensus on issues related to and develop consensus recommendations in terms of creating both a well-characterized normative data base of comprehensive imaging and ancillary data to serve as a reference for tools that will allow interpretation of advanced neuroimaging tests at an individual level of a patient with traumatic brain injury. The workshop involved discussions concerning the following: 1) designation of the policies and infrastructure needed for a normative data base, 2) principles for characterizing normal control subjects, and 3) standardizing research neuroimaging protocols for traumatic brain injury. The present article summarizes these recommendations and examines practical steps to achieve them.

摘要

在过去十年中,创伤性脑损伤患者可获取的神经影像学信息类型取得了令人瞩目的进展。然而,尽管信息有所增加,但对于这些信息对患者预后准确性和治疗途径的贡献的理解仍然有限。现有的技术通常使我们能够推断出表明脑组织生理和功能改变的微观变化的存在。然而,由于通常缺乏组织学证实,在几乎所有情况下,使用这些技术得出的结论仍然只是推断性的。因此,需要通过使用来自大样本人群的数据来验证这些技术,这些数据以统一的方式获得,按照公认的程序进行分析,并与密切监测的临床结果相关联。目前,这些方法中的许多仍然局限于基于人群的研究,而不是个体水平的诊断,特别是对于轻度或中度的创伤性脑损伤。需要并且优先开发以患者为中心的工具,使先进的神经影像学工具能够应用于临床环境。开发这些工具的一个障碍是缺乏一个按年龄、性别和合并症分层的、序列特定的参考成像数据库,该数据库可以清晰地了解不同人群的正常变异。这样的数据库将为研究人员和临床医生提供必要的信息,以开发用于在临床环境中基于患者解释先进神经影像学研究的计算工具。2014年5月2日在加拿大魁北克省蒙特利尔举行的最近的“美国神经放射学会-美国放射学会-国际神经放射学会-美国神经放射学会创伤性脑损伤联合研讨会:将创伤性脑损伤的先进神经影像学引入临床”,汇集了神经放射学家、神经学家、精神科医生、神经心理学家、神经影像学科学家、国家神经疾病和中风研究所成员、行业代表以及其他创伤性脑损伤利益相关者,试图就与创建一个特征明确的综合成像和辅助数据的规范数据库相关的问题达成共识,并就开发共识性建议,该数据库将作为工具的参考,以允许在个体水平上解释创伤性脑损伤患者的先进神经影像学检查。该研讨会涉及以下讨论:1)规范数据库所需的政策和基础设施的指定,2)表征正常对照受试者的原则,以及3)创伤性脑损伤研究神经影像学协议的标准化。本文总结了这些建议并探讨了实现这些建议的实际步骤。