• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

LEAP:通过学习和评估关联模式进行生物标志物推断。

LEAP: biomarker inference through learning and evaluating association patterns.

作者信息

Jiang Xia, Neapolitan Richard E

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.

出版信息

Genet Epidemiol. 2015 Mar;39(3):173-84. doi: 10.1002/gepi.21889. Epub 2015 Feb 12.

DOI:10.1002/gepi.21889
PMID:25677188
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4366363/
Abstract

Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) high-dimensional datasets are available from Genome Wide Association Studies (GWAS). Such data provide researchers opportunities to investigate the complex genetic basis of diseases. Much of genetic risk might be due to undiscovered epistatic interactions, which are interactions in which combination of several genes affect disease. Research aimed at discovering interacting SNPs from GWAS datasets proceeded in two directions. First, tools were developed to evaluate candidate interactions. Second, algorithms were developed to search over the space of candidate interactions. Another problem when learning interacting SNPs, which has not received much attention, is evaluating how likely it is that the learned SNPs are associated with the disease. A complete system should provide this information as well. We develop such a system. Our system, called LEAP, includes a new heuristic search algorithm for learning interacting SNPs, and a Bayesian network based algorithm for computing the probability of their association. We evaluated the performance of LEAP using 100 1,000-SNP simulated datasets, each of which contains 15 SNPs involved in interactions. When learning interacting SNPs from these datasets, LEAP outperformed seven others methods. Furthermore, only SNPs involved in interactions were found to be probable. We also used LEAP to analyze real Alzheimer's disease and breast cancer GWAS datasets. We obtained interesting and new results from the Alzheimer's dataset, but limited results from the breast cancer dataset. We conclude that our results support that LEAP is a useful tool for extracting candidate interacting SNPs from high-dimensional datasets and determining their probability.

摘要

单核苷酸多态性(SNP)高维数据集可从全基因组关联研究(GWAS)中获取。此类数据为研究人员提供了调查疾病复杂遗传基础的机会。许多遗传风险可能归因于尚未发现的上位性相互作用,即几个基因的组合影响疾病的相互作用。旨在从GWAS数据集中发现相互作用SNP的研究朝着两个方向进行。首先,开发了工具来评估候选相互作用。其次,开发了算法来在候选相互作用空间中进行搜索。在学习相互作用SNP时,另一个未受到太多关注的问题是评估所学习的SNP与疾病相关的可能性。一个完整的系统也应该提供此信息。我们开发了这样一个系统。我们的系统称为LEAP,包括一种用于学习相互作用SNP的新启发式搜索算法,以及一种基于贝叶斯网络的算法来计算它们关联的概率。我们使用100个1000-SNP模拟数据集评估了LEAP的性能,每个数据集包含15个参与相互作用的SNP。当从这些数据集中学习相互作用SNP时,LEAP的表现优于其他七种方法。此外,仅发现参与相互作用的SNP是可能的。我们还使用LEAP分析了真实的阿尔茨海默病和乳腺癌GWAS数据集。我们从阿尔茨海默病数据集中获得了有趣的新结果,但从乳腺癌数据集中获得的结果有限。我们得出结论,我们的结果支持LEAP是从高维数据集中提取候选相互作用SNP并确定其概率的有用工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/729e/4366363/0a14c549331c/nihms-655404-f0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/729e/4366363/1d14bd1fc3ce/nihms-655404-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/729e/4366363/0a0e5f03b806/nihms-655404-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/729e/4366363/d66b4496cab0/nihms-655404-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/729e/4366363/c74c3e97f8cd/nihms-655404-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/729e/4366363/24af618cdd1e/nihms-655404-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/729e/4366363/c166801e49de/nihms-655404-f0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/729e/4366363/0a14c549331c/nihms-655404-f0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/729e/4366363/1d14bd1fc3ce/nihms-655404-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/729e/4366363/0a0e5f03b806/nihms-655404-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/729e/4366363/d66b4496cab0/nihms-655404-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/729e/4366363/c74c3e97f8cd/nihms-655404-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/729e/4366363/24af618cdd1e/nihms-655404-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/729e/4366363/c166801e49de/nihms-655404-f0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/729e/4366363/0a14c549331c/nihms-655404-f0007.jpg

相似文献

1
LEAP: biomarker inference through learning and evaluating association patterns.LEAP:通过学习和评估关联模式进行生物标志物推断。
Genet Epidemiol. 2015 Mar;39(3):173-84. doi: 10.1002/gepi.21889. Epub 2015 Feb 12.
2
Mining pure, strict epistatic interactions from high-dimensional datasets: ameliorating the curse of dimensionality.从高维数据集挖掘纯净、严格的上位性相互作用:缓解维度灾难。
PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e46771. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0046771. Epub 2012 Oct 12.
3
An algorithm for direct causal learning of influences on patient outcomes.一种用于直接因果学习对患者预后影响的算法。
Artif Intell Med. 2017 Jan;75:1-15. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2016.10.003. Epub 2016 Nov 5.
4
Genetic studies of complex human diseases: characterizing SNP-disease associations using Bayesian networks.复杂人类疾病的遗传学研究:使用贝叶斯网络表征单核苷酸多态性与疾病的关联
BMC Syst Biol. 2012;6 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S14. doi: 10.1186/1752-0509-6-S3-S14. Epub 2012 Dec 17.
5
Learning Predictive Interactions Using Information Gain and Bayesian Network Scoring.使用信息增益和贝叶斯网络评分学习预测性相互作用。
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 1;10(12):e0143247. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143247. eCollection 2015.
6
Discovering causal interactions using Bayesian network scoring and information gain.使用贝叶斯网络评分和信息增益发现因果相互作用。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2016 May 26;17(1):221. doi: 10.1186/s12859-016-1084-8.
7
A fast algorithm for learning epistatic genomic relationships.一种用于学习上位性基因组关系的快速算法。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2010 Nov 13;2010:341-5.
8
Learning genetic epistasis using Bayesian network scoring criteria.利用贝叶斯网络评分标准学习遗传上位性。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2011 Mar 31;12:89. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-89.
9
SEEI: spherical evolution with feedback mechanism for identifying epistatic interactions.SEEI:用于识别上位相互作用的球形进化与反馈机制。
BMC Genomics. 2024 May 13;25(1):462. doi: 10.1186/s12864-024-10373-4.
10
A Markov blanket-based method for detecting causal SNPs in GWAS.基于马尔可夫毯的 GWAS 中因果 SNP 检测方法。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2010 Apr 29;11 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S5. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-S3-S5.

引用本文的文献

1
Epi-GTBN: an approach of epistasis mining based on genetic Tabu algorithm and Bayesian network.Epi-GTBN:一种基于遗传禁忌搜索算法和贝叶斯网络的上位性挖掘方法。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2019 Aug 28;20(1):444. doi: 10.1186/s12859-019-3022-z.
2
Modeling miRNA-mRNA interactions that cause phenotypic abnormality in breast cancer patients.对导致乳腺癌患者表型异常的微小RNA-信使核糖核酸相互作用进行建模。
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 9;12(8):e0182666. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182666. eCollection 2017.
3
Genetics of Common Antipsychotic-Induced Adverse Effects.

本文引用的文献

1
Identifying genetic interactions associated with late-onset Alzheimer's disease.识别与晚发性阿尔茨海默病相关的基因相互作用。
BioData Min. 2014 Dec 19;7(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s13040-014-0035-z. eCollection 2014.
2
A novel method to identify high order gene-gene interactions in genome-wide association studies: gene-based MDR.一种在全基因组关联研究中识别高阶基因-基因相互作用的新方法:基于基因的多变量数据分析。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2012 Jun 11;13 Suppl 9(Suppl 9):S5. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-13-S9-S5.
3
Characterizing genetic interactions in human disease association studies using statistical epistasis networks.
常见抗精神病药物所致不良反应的遗传学
Mol Neuropsychiatry. 2016 Jul;2(2):61-78. doi: 10.1159/000445802. Epub 2016 May 20.
4
Discovering causal interactions using Bayesian network scoring and information gain.使用贝叶斯网络评分和信息增益发现因果相互作用。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2016 May 26;17(1):221. doi: 10.1186/s12859-016-1084-8.
5
Learning Predictive Interactions Using Information Gain and Bayesian Network Scoring.使用信息增益和贝叶斯网络评分学习预测性相互作用。
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 1;10(12):e0143247. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143247. eCollection 2015.
利用统计互作网络刻画人类疾病关联研究中的遗传互作。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2011 Sep 12;12:364. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-364.
4
A bayesian method for evaluating and discovering disease loci associations.贝叶斯方法评估和发现疾病相关基因座。
PLoS One. 2011;6(8):e22075. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022075. Epub 2011 Aug 10.
5
Comparative analysis of methods for detecting interacting loci.检测互作基因座方法的比较分析。
BMC Genomics. 2011 Jul 5;12:344. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-12-344.
6
Detecting epistatic effects in association studies at a genomic level based on an ensemble approach.基于集成方法在基因组水平上检测关联研究中的上位效应。
Bioinformatics. 2011 Jul 1;27(13):i222-9. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr227.
7
Analysis of Genome-Wide Association Study (GWAS) data looking for replicating signals in Alzheimer's disease (AD).对全基因组关联研究(GWAS)数据进行分析,以寻找阿尔茨海默病(AD)中的重复信号。
Int J Mol Epidemiol Genet. 2010;1(1):53-66. Epub 2009 Nov 15.
8
Learning genetic epistasis using Bayesian network scoring criteria.利用贝叶斯网络评分标准学习遗传上位性。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2011 Mar 31;12:89. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-89.
9
A fast algorithm for learning epistatic genomic relationships.一种用于学习上位性基因组关系的快速算法。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2010 Nov 13;2010:341-5.
10
A Markov blanket-based method for detecting causal SNPs in GWAS.基于马尔可夫毯的 GWAS 中因果 SNP 检测方法。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2010 Apr 29;11 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S5. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-S3-S5.