• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

未来生态系统管理的形态:预测风险与增强恢复力

The Shape of Ecosystem Management to Come: Anticipating Risks and Fostering Resilience.

作者信息

Seidl Rupert

机构信息

Institute of Silviculture, in the Department of Forest and Soil Sciences at the University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU), in Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Bioscience. 2014 Dec 1;64(12):1159-1169. doi: 10.1093/biosci/biu172.

DOI:10.1093/biosci/biu172
PMID:25729079
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4340566/
Abstract

Global change is increasingly challenging the sustainable provisioning of ecosystem services to society. Addressing future uncertainty and risk has therefore become a central problem of ecosystem management. With risk management and resilience-based stewardship, two contrasting approaches have been proposed to address this issue. Whereas one is concentrated on anticipating and mitigating risks, the other is focused on fostering the ability to absorb perturbations and maintain desired properties. While they have hitherto been discussed largely separately in the literature, I here propose a unifying framework of anticipating risks and fostering resilience in ecosystem management. Anticipatory action is advocated when the predictability of risk is high and sufficient knowledge to address it is available. Conversely, in situations in which predictability and knowledge are limited, resilience-based measures are paramount. I conclude that, by adopting a purposeful combination of insights from risk and resilience research, we can make ecosystem services provisioning more robust to future uncertainty and change.

摘要

全球变化正对生态系统服务向社会的可持续供应构成越来越大的挑战。因此,应对未来的不确定性和风险已成为生态系统管理的核心问题。针对这一问题,人们提出了风险管理和基于恢复力的管理这两种截然不同的方法。一种方法专注于预测和减轻风险,另一种则侧重于培养吸收干扰并维持理想特性的能力。虽然它们迄今在文献中大多是分开讨论的,但我在此提出一个在生态系统管理中预测风险和培养恢复力的统一框架。当风险的可预测性高且有足够的知识来应对时,提倡采取前瞻性行动。相反,在可预测性和知识有限的情况下,基于恢复力的措施至关重要。我得出结论,通过有目的地结合风险和恢复力研究的见解,我们可以使生态系统服务的供应对未来的不确定性和变化更具韧性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a72d/4776694/dc249ae82b7b/biu172fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a72d/4776694/5de776dcebaf/biu172fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a72d/4776694/4be7b72a80a2/biu172fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a72d/4776694/dc249ae82b7b/biu172fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a72d/4776694/5de776dcebaf/biu172fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a72d/4776694/4be7b72a80a2/biu172fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a72d/4776694/dc249ae82b7b/biu172fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
The Shape of Ecosystem Management to Come: Anticipating Risks and Fostering Resilience.未来生态系统管理的形态:预测风险与增强恢复力
Bioscience. 2014 Dec 1;64(12):1159-1169. doi: 10.1093/biosci/biu172.
2
Searching for resilience: addressing the impacts of changing disturbance regimes on forest ecosystem services.探寻恢复力:应对干扰 regime 变化对森林生态系统服务的影响
J Appl Ecol. 2016 Feb 1;53(1):120-129. doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.12511.
3
Natural disturbance impacts on ecosystem services and biodiversity in temperate and boreal forests.自然干扰对温带和北方森林生态系统服务及生物多样性的影响。
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2016 Aug;91(3):760-81. doi: 10.1111/brv.12193. Epub 2015 May 22.
4
The Effects of Interaction between Climate Change and Land-Use/Cover Change on Biodiversity-Related Ecosystem Services.气候变化与土地利用/覆盖变化之间的相互作用对与生物多样性相关的生态系统服务的影响。
Glob Chall. 2019 May 6;3(9):1800095. doi: 10.1002/gch2.201800095. eCollection 2019 Sep.
5
Shaping and enhancing resilient forests for a resilient society.塑造和增强有弹性的森林,以建设有弹性的社会。
Ambio. 2024 Aug;53(8):1095-1108. doi: 10.1007/s13280-024-02006-7. Epub 2024 Apr 5.
6
Navigating Novelty and Risk in Resilience Management.应对弹性管理中的新颖性和风险
Trends Ecol Evol. 2018 Nov;33(11):863-873. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2018.08.012. Epub 2018 Sep 26.
7
Operationalizing resilience for adaptive coral reef management under global environmental change.在全球环境变化下,将恢复力应用于适应性珊瑚礁管理的实践操作。
Glob Chang Biol. 2015 Jan;21(1):48-61. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12700. Epub 2014 Sep 5.
8
Network analysis can guide resilience-based management in forest landscapes under global change.网络分析可以指导在全球变化下的森林景观中的基于弹性的管理。
Ecol Appl. 2021 Jan;31(1):e2221. doi: 10.1002/eap.2221. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
9
[Related theories of ecosystem risk under global change and their linkages.].[全球变化下的生态系统风险相关理论及其联系。]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2022 Mar;33(3):629-637. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202203.022.
10
The 2023 Latin America report of the Countdown on health and climate change: the imperative for health-centred climate-resilient development.《2023年健康与气候变化倒计时拉丁美洲报告:以健康为中心的气候适应型发展的必要性》
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2024 Apr 23;33:100746. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2024.100746. eCollection 2024 May.

引用本文的文献

1
The Sweetgum Inscriber, (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) Reared on Artificial Diets and American Sweetgum Logs.在人工饲料和美国胶皮糖香脂原木上饲养的胶皮糖香脂刻腹小蠹(鞘翅目:象甲科:小蠹亚科)
Insects. 2023 Feb 14;14(2):186. doi: 10.3390/insects14020186.
2
Assessing the Economic Resilience of Different Management Systems to Severe Forest Disturbance.评估不同管理系统对严重森林干扰的经济恢复力。
Environ Resour Econ (Dordr). 2023;84(2):343-381. doi: 10.1007/s10640-022-00719-5. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
3
Reducing rotation age to address increasing disturbances in Central Europe: Potential and limitations.

本文引用的文献

1
Disturbance legacies increase the resilience of forest ecosystem structure, composition, and functioning.干扰遗留效应增强了森林生态系统结构、组成和功能的恢复力。
Ecol Appl. 2014 Dec 1;24(8):2063-2077. doi: 10.1890/14-0255.1.
2
Response diversity determines the resilience of ecosystems to environmental change.响应多样性决定了生态系统对环境变化的恢复力。
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2013 May;88(2):349-64. doi: 10.1111/brv.12004. Epub 2012 Dec 6.
3
Forest management under climatic and social uncertainty: trade-offs between reducing climate change impacts and fostering adaptive capacity.
缩短轮伐期以应对中欧日益增加的干扰:潜力与局限
For Ecol Manage. 2020 Nov;475:118408. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118408.
4
Effects of disturbance patterns and deadwood on the microclimate in European beech forests.干扰模式和枯木对欧洲山毛榉林微气候的影响。
Agric For Meteorol. 2020 Sep 15;291. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2020.108066.
5
Do bark beetle outbreaks amplify or dampen future bark beetle disturbances in Central Europe?中欧地区小蠹虫爆发会加剧还是减轻未来小蠹虫灾害?
J Ecol. 2021 Feb;109(2):737-749. doi: 10.1111/1365-2745.13502. Epub 2020 Oct 12.
6
Contrasting vulnerability of monospecific and species-diverse forests to wind and bark beetle disturbance: The role of management.单一树种森林和物种多样森林对风害和树皮甲虫干扰的脆弱性对比:管理的作用。
Ecol Evol. 2020 Oct 16;10(21):12233-12245. doi: 10.1002/ece3.6854. eCollection 2020 Nov.
7
Nitrogen and Ergosterol Concentrations Varied in Live Jack Pine Phloem Following Inoculations With Fungal Associates of Mountain Pine Beetle.在用山地松甲虫的真菌共生体接种后,活的短叶松韧皮部中的氮和麦角固醇浓度发生了变化。
Front Microbiol. 2020 Jul 22;11:1703. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01703. eCollection 2020.
8
The tree species matters: Biodiversity and ecosystem service implications of replacing Scots pine production stands with Norway spruce.树种很重要:用挪威云杉取代苏格兰松人工林对生物多样性和生态系统服务的影响
Ambio. 2020 May;49(5):1035-1049. doi: 10.1007/s13280-019-01259-x. Epub 2019 Sep 24.
9
Canopy mortality has doubled in Europe's temperate forests over the last three decades.在过去的三十年里,欧洲温带森林的林冠死亡率增加了一倍。
Nat Commun. 2018 Nov 26;9(1):4978. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07539-6.
10
Flow intermittence and ecosystem services in rivers of the Anthropocene.人类世河流中的水流间歇性与生态系统服务
J Appl Ecol. 2018;55(1):353-364. doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.12941.
在气候和社会不确定性下的森林管理:减少气候变化影响和培养适应能力之间的权衡。
J Environ Manage. 2013 Jan 15;114:461-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.09.028. Epub 2012 Nov 26.
4
TEASIng apart alien species risk assessments: a framework for best practices. teased 分离外来物种风险评估:最佳实践框架。
Ecol Lett. 2012 Dec;15(12):1475-93. doi: 10.1111/ele.12003. Epub 2012 Sep 30.
5
Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity.生物多样性丧失及其对人类的影响。
Nature. 2012 Jun 6;486(7401):59-67. doi: 10.1038/nature11148.
6
Risk and cooperation: managing hazardous fuel in mixed ownership landscapes.风险与合作:混合所有制景观中的危险燃料管理。
Environ Manage. 2012 Jun;49(6):1192-207. doi: 10.1007/s00267-012-9848-z. Epub 2012 Apr 11.
7
Modelling ecological systems in a changing world.在不断变化的世界中建模生态系统。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012 Jan 19;367(1586):181-90. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2011.0172.
8
ISO 31000:2009--Setting a new standard for risk management.ISO 31000:2009——为风险管理设定新标准。
Risk Anal. 2010 Jun;30(6):881-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01442.x.
9
Ecological impacts of early 21st century agricultural change in Europe--a review.21世纪初欧洲农业变革的生态影响——综述
J Environ Manage. 2009 Oct;91(1):22-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.07.005. Epub 2009 Aug 29.
10
Forest fuel reduction alters fire severity and long-term carbon storage in three Pacific Northwest ecosystems.减少森林燃料会改变太平洋西北地区三个生态系统的火灾严重程度和长期碳储存。
Ecol Appl. 2009 Apr;19(3):643-55. doi: 10.1890/08-0501.1.