• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国小型巴士碰撞事故中行人的损伤模式与风险

Pedestrian injury patterns and risk in minibus collisions in China.

作者信息

Li Kui, Fan Xiaoxiang, Yin Zhiyong

机构信息

Institute for Traffic Medicine, Department 4th, Institute of Surgery Research, Daping Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chonhqing, China (mainland).

Department of Biomechanical Engineering, Chongqing University of Technology, Chonhqing, China (mainland).

出版信息

Med Sci Monit. 2015 Mar 10;21:727-34. doi: 10.12659/MSM.893622.

DOI:10.12659/MSM.893622
PMID:25754962
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4364255/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The minibus, with a nearly flat front, is widely used in China, especially in the underdeveloped regions, and results in large numbers of pedestrian injuries and deaths. The purpose of this study was to determine the injury patterns and risk for pedestrians involved in these crashes.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We conducted an in-depth investigation of minibus/pedestrian accidents in Chongqing, China, occurring between September 2000 and April 2014. The enrolled pedestrians was classified into 3 groups: young (aged 14-44 years), middle-aged (aged 45-59 years), and elderly (aged over 60 years). Pedestrian injuries were coded according to the Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS).

RESULTS

A total of 109 pedestrians, with an average age of 55.7±16.2 years, were injured or killed--30.3% were young, 23.9% were middle-aged, and 45.9% were elderly. Pedestrians hit by a minibus had a high proportion of head, chest, and extremity injuries--84.4%, 50.5%, and 52.3%, respectively. In addition, impact speeds in excess of 75 km/h all ultimately resulted in fatalities. At an impact speed of 30 km/h, the risk of pedestrian fatality and AIS3+ injury are approximately 12.0% and 37.2%, respectively. At 50 km/h the risks are 65.2% and 96.9%, respectively, and at 70 km/h the risks are 96.3% and 99.9%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

A higher likelihood of chest injury was associated with being older and impact speed of over 40 km/h in minibus/pedestrian collision. Our data suggest that the injury patterns of pedestrians in minibus collisions differ from that in other vehicle/pedestrian collisions. These findings could contribute to better understanding of the injury patterns and risk of pedestrian in minibus collisions in China, which may play an important role in developing measures to improve traffic safety.

摘要

背景

小型客车前端近乎扁平,在中国广泛使用,尤其是在欠发达地区,导致大量行人伤亡。本研究的目的是确定这些碰撞事故中行人的损伤模式和风险。

材料与方法

我们对2000年9月至2014年4月期间发生在中国重庆的小型客车/行人事故进行了深入调查。纳入的行人分为3组:青年组(14 - 44岁)、中年组(45 - 59岁)和老年组(60岁以上)。行人损伤根据简明损伤定级标准(AIS)进行编码。

结果

共有109名行人受伤或死亡,平均年龄为55.7±16.2岁,其中青年组占30.3%,中年组占23.9%,老年组占45.9%。被小型客车撞击的行人头部、胸部和四肢损伤比例较高,分别为84.4%、50.5%和52.3%。此外,撞击速度超过75公里/小时最终均导致死亡。在撞击速度为30公里/小时时,行人死亡风险和AIS3 +级损伤风险分别约为12.0%和37.2%。在50公里/小时时,风险分别为65.2%和96.9%,在70公里/小时时,风险分别为96.3%和99.9%。

结论

在小型客车/行人碰撞中,年龄较大以及撞击速度超过40公里/小时与胸部损伤的可能性较高相关。我们的数据表明,小型客车碰撞中行人的损伤模式与其他车辆/行人碰撞不同。这些发现有助于更好地了解中国小型客车碰撞中行人的损伤模式和风险,这可能在制定改善交通安全的措施中发挥重要作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c2d/4364255/1206d1a68b79/medscimonit-21-727-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c2d/4364255/5505f95b0d02/medscimonit-21-727-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c2d/4364255/f60f8d1058e3/medscimonit-21-727-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c2d/4364255/1206d1a68b79/medscimonit-21-727-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c2d/4364255/5505f95b0d02/medscimonit-21-727-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c2d/4364255/f60f8d1058e3/medscimonit-21-727-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c2d/4364255/1206d1a68b79/medscimonit-21-727-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Pedestrian injury patterns and risk in minibus collisions in China.中国小型巴士碰撞事故中行人的损伤模式与风险
Med Sci Monit. 2015 Mar 10;21:727-34. doi: 10.12659/MSM.893622.
2
Logistic regression analysis of pedestrian casualty risk in passenger vehicle collisions in China.中国乘用车碰撞中行人伤亡风险的 logistic 回归分析。
Accid Anal Prev. 2010 Jul;42(4):987-93. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2009.11.006. Epub 2010 Feb 6.
3
An investigation on the head injuries of adult pedestrians by passenger cars in China.中国轿车对成人行人头部伤害的调查。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2013;14(7):712-7. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2012.752574.
4
The influence of passenger car front shape on pedestrian injury risk observed from German in-depth accident data.从德国深度事故数据观察乘用车前部形状对行人受伤风险的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Apr;101:11-21. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.01.012. Epub 2017 Feb 3.
5
Detailed assessment of pedestrian ground contact injuries observed from in-depth accident data.详细评估从深入事故数据中观察到的行人地面接触伤害。
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Jan;110:9-17. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.10.011. Epub 2017 Nov 6.
6
Analysis of 121 fatal passenger car-adult pedestrian accidents in China.中国121起致命乘用车-成年行人事故分析。
J Forensic Leg Med. 2014 Oct;27:76-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2014.08.003. Epub 2014 Aug 16.
7
Passenger and heavy vehicle collisions with pedestrians: Assessment of injury mechanisms and risk.乘客及重型车辆与行人的碰撞:损伤机制及风险评估
Accid Anal Prev. 2023 Sep;190:107139. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2023.107139. Epub 2023 Jun 13.
8
Evaluation of pedestrian road traffic maxillofacial injuries in a Nigerian tertiary hospital.尼日利亚一家三级医院行人道路交通颌面损伤情况评估
Afr J Med Med Sci. 2014 Dec;43(4):353-9.
9
Severity of road crashes involving pedestrians in Metro Manila, Philippines.菲律宾马尼拉都会区涉及行人的道路交通事故严重程度。
Accid Anal Prev. 2016 Sep;94:216-26. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.06.006. Epub 2016 Jun 21.
10
Older Adults at Increased Risk as Pedestrians in Victoria, Australia: An Examination of Crash Characteristics and Injury Outcomes.澳大利亚维多利亚州老年行人面临更高风险:碰撞特征与受伤结果研究
Traffic Inj Prev. 2015;16 Suppl 2:S161-7. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2015.1061662.

引用本文的文献

1
A Study on Influence of Minivan Front-End Design and Impact Velocity on Pedestrian Thorax Kinematics and Injury Risk.小型货车前端设计与碰撞速度对行人胸部运动学及损伤风险影响的研究
Appl Bionics Biomech. 2018 Sep 3;2018:7350159. doi: 10.1155/2018/7350159. eCollection 2018.
2
Grouping of body areas affected in traffic accidents. A cohort study.交通事故中受影响身体部位的分组。一项队列研究。
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2018 Mar;9(Suppl 1):S49-S55. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2017.11.012. Epub 2017 Nov 24.
3
Evaluation of Severity Score in Patients with Lower Limb and Pelvic Fractures Injured in Motor Vehicle Front-Impact Collisions.

本文引用的文献

1
A study of bicyclist kinematics and injuries based on reconstruction of passenger car-bicycle accident in China.基于中国乘用车与自行车事故重建的自行车骑行者运动学与损伤研究
Accid Anal Prev. 2014 Oct;71:50-9. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2014.04.021. Epub 2014 May 28.
2
The epidemiology and cost analysis of patients presented to Emergency Department following traffic accidents.交通伤患者就诊于急诊科的流行病学和成本分析。
Med Sci Monit. 2013 Dec 9;19:1125-30. doi: 10.12659/MSM.889539.
3
An investigation on the head injuries of adult pedestrians by passenger cars in China.
机动车前碰撞致下肢及骨盆骨折患者严重程度评分的评估
Med Sci Monit. 2016 Dec 1;22:4692-4698. doi: 10.12659/msm.898459.
4
Finite element simulation of lower limb injuries to the driver in minibus frontal collisions.小型客车正面碰撞中驾驶员下肢损伤的有限元模拟
Chin J Traumatol. 2016 Jun 1;19(3):146-50. doi: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2016.01.015.
5
Economic Burden of Road Traffic Accidents; Report from a Single Center from South Eastern Iran.道路交通事故的经济负担;来自伊朗东南部一个单一中心的报告。
Bull Emerg Trauma. 2016 Jan;4(1):43-7.
中国轿车对成人行人头部伤害的调查。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2013;14(7):712-7. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2012.752574.
4
Effects of vehicle impact velocity, vehicle front-end shapes on pedestrian injury risk.车辆碰撞速度、车辆前端形状对行人受伤风险的影响。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2012 Sep;13(5):507-18. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2012.661111.
5
Literature review of pedestrian fatality risk as a function of car impact speed.行人死亡风险的文献综述,作为汽车碰撞速度的函数。
Accid Anal Prev. 2011 Jan;43(1):25-33. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.04.003. Epub 2010 Sep 15.
6
Comparison of injuries sustained by drivers and pillion passengers in fatal head-on motorcycle collision accidents.正面碰撞摩托车事故中司机和后座乘客受伤情况的比较。
Forensic Sci Int. 2011 Apr 15;207(1-3):188-92. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.10.003. Epub 2010 Oct 28.
7
Car-to-pedestrian collision reconstruction with injury as an evaluation index.以损伤为评价指标的车-行人碰撞重建。
Accid Anal Prev. 2010 Jul;42(4):1320-5. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.02.012. Epub 2010 Mar 17.
8
Logistic regression analysis of pedestrian casualty risk in passenger vehicle collisions in China.中国乘用车碰撞中行人伤亡风险的 logistic 回归分析。
Accid Anal Prev. 2010 Jul;42(4):987-93. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2009.11.006. Epub 2010 Feb 6.
9
Pedestrian fatality risk as a function of car impact speed.行人死亡风险与汽车碰撞速度的函数关系。
Accid Anal Prev. 2009 May;41(3):536-42. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2009.02.002. Epub 2009 Feb 24.
10
Safety impacts due to the incompatibility of SUVs, minivans, and pickup trucks in two-vehicle collisions.运动型多用途汽车(SUV)、小型货车和皮卡两车碰撞时的不相容性所带来的安全影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2008 Nov;40(6):1987-95. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2008.08.026. Epub 2008 Sep 16.