• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

捕捉功能磁共振成像数据中的个体差异:独立成分分析与独立向量分析的图论分析

Capturing subject variability in fMRI data: A graph-theoretical analysis of GICA vs. IVA.

作者信息

Laney Jonathan, Westlake Kelly P, Ma Sai, Woytowicz Elizabeth, Calhoun Vince D, Adalı Tülay

机构信息

University of Maryland, Baltimore County, Baltimore, MD 21250, USA.

University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.

出版信息

J Neurosci Methods. 2015 May 30;247:32-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2015.03.019. Epub 2015 Mar 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2015.03.019
PMID:25797843
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4961734/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recent studies using simulated functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data show that independent vector analysis (IVA) is a superior solution for capturing spatial subject variability when compared with the widely used group independent component analysis (GICA). Retaining such variability is of fundamental importance for identifying spatially localized group differences in intrinsic brain networks.

NEW METHODS

Few studies on capturing subject variability and order selection have evaluated real fMRI data. Comparison of multivariate components generated by multiple algorithms is not straightforward. The main difficulties are finding concise methods to extract meaningful features and comparing multiple components despite lack of a ground truth. In this paper, we present a graph-theoretical (GT) approach to effectively compare the ability of multiple multivariate algorithms to capture subject variability for real fMRI data for effective group comparisons. The GT approach is applied to components generated from fMRI data, collected from individuals with stroke, before and after a rehabilitation intervention.

COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHOD

IVA is compared with widely used GICA for the purpose of group discrimination in terms of GT features. In addition, masks are applied for motor related components generated by both algorithms.

CONCLUSIONS

Results show that IVA better captures subject variability producing more activated voxels and generating components with less mutual information in the spatial domain than Group ICA. IVA-generated components result in smaller p-values and clearer trends in GT features.

摘要

背景

最近使用模拟功能磁共振成像(fMRI)数据的研究表明,与广泛使用的组独立成分分析(GICA)相比,独立向量分析(IVA)在捕获空间个体变异性方面是一种更优的方法。保留这种变异性对于识别内在脑网络中空间定位的组间差异至关重要。

新方法

很少有关于捕获个体变异性和顺序选择的研究评估真实的fMRI数据。比较多种算法生成的多变量成分并非易事。主要困难在于找到简洁的方法来提取有意义的特征,以及在缺乏真实对照的情况下比较多个成分。在本文中,我们提出一种基于图论(GT)的方法,以有效比较多种多变量算法捕获真实fMRI数据个体变异性的能力,从而进行有效的组间比较。该GT方法应用于从患有中风的个体在康复干预前后收集的fMRI数据生成的成分。

与现有方法的比较

就GT特征而言,将IVA与广泛使用的GICA进行组间区分比较。此外,对两种算法生成的与运动相关的成分应用掩码。

结论

结果表明,与组独立成分分析相比,IVA能更好地捕获个体变异性,在空间域中产生更多激活的体素,生成的成分具有更少的互信息。IVA生成的成分导致更小的p值和更清晰的GT特征趋势。

相似文献

1
Capturing subject variability in fMRI data: A graph-theoretical analysis of GICA vs. IVA.捕捉功能磁共振成像数据中的个体差异:独立成分分析与独立向量分析的图论分析
J Neurosci Methods. 2015 May 30;247:32-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2015.03.019. Epub 2015 Mar 20.
2
Preserving subject variability in group fMRI analysis: performance evaluation of GICA vs. IVA.保留组 fMRI 分析中的个体变异性:GICA 与 IVA 的性能评估。
Front Syst Neurosci. 2014 Jun 26;8:106. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00106. eCollection 2014.
3
Comparison of IVA and GIG-ICA in Brain Functional Network Estimation Using fMRI Data.使用功能磁共振成像数据进行脑功能网络估计时IVA与GIG-ICA的比较
Front Neurosci. 2017 May 19;11:267. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2017.00267. eCollection 2017.
4
Quantifying motor recovery after stroke using independent vector analysis and graph-theoretical analysis.使用独立向量分析和图论分析量化中风后的运动恢复情况。
Neuroimage Clin. 2015 Apr 22;8:298-304. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2015.04.014. eCollection 2015.
5
Towards data-driven group inferences of resting-state fMRI data in rodents: Comparison of group ICA, GIG-ICA, and IVA-GL.迈向啮齿动物静息态功能磁共振成像数据的数据驱动组内推断:组独立成分分析、广义独立成分分析和独立向量分析-广义似然比的比较
J Neurosci Methods. 2022 Jan 15;366:109411. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2021.109411. Epub 2021 Nov 15.
6
Impact of inter-individual variability on the estimation of default mode network in temporal concatenation group ICA.个体间变异性对时间串联组独立成分分析中默认模式网络估计的影响。
Neuroimage. 2021 Aug 15;237:118114. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118114. Epub 2021 Apr 29.
7
Subject order-independent group ICA (SOI-GICA) for functional MRI data analysis.基于独立成分分析的功能磁共振数据分析。
Neuroimage. 2010 Jul 15;51(4):1414-24. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.03.039. Epub 2010 Mar 23.
8
Capturing inter-subject variability with group independent component analysis of fMRI data: a simulation study.基于 fMRI 数据的组独立成分分析捕获组间变异性:一项模拟研究。
Neuroimage. 2012 Feb 15;59(4):4141-59. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.010. Epub 2011 Oct 14.
9
Adaptive independent vector analysis for multi-subject complex-valued fMRI data.用于多受试者复值功能磁共振成像数据的自适应独立向量分析
J Neurosci Methods. 2017 Apr 1;281:49-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2017.01.017. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
10
Independent vector analysis (IVA): multivariate approach for fMRI group study.独立向量分析(IVA):功能磁共振成像群体研究的多变量方法。
Neuroimage. 2008 Mar 1;40(1):86-109. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.11.019. Epub 2007 Nov 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring synergies: Advancing neuroscience with machine learning.探索协同效应:借助机器学习推动神经科学发展。
Signal Processing. 2026 Jan;238. doi: 10.1016/j.sigpro.2025.110116. Epub 2025 Jun 2.
2
Independent Vector Analysis for Feature Extraction in Motor Imagery Classification.独立向量分析在运动想象分类中的特征提取。
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Aug 22;24(16):5428. doi: 10.3390/s24165428.
3
Constrained Independent Vector Analysis With Reference for Multi-Subject fMRI Analysis.用于多受试者功能磁共振成像分析的带参考的约束独立向量分析

本文引用的文献

1
Preserving subject variability in group fMRI analysis: performance evaluation of GICA vs. IVA.保留组 fMRI 分析中的个体变异性:GICA 与 IVA 的性能评估。
Front Syst Neurosci. 2014 Jun 26;8:106. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00106. eCollection 2014.
2
Brain connectivity networks in schizophrenia underlying resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging.精神分裂症静息态功能磁共振成像的脑连接网络。
Curr Top Med Chem. 2012;12(21):2415-25. doi: 10.2174/156802612805289890.
3
Modulations of functional connectivity in the healthy and schizophrenia groups during task and rest.
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2024 Dec;71(12):3531-3542. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2024.3432273. Epub 2024 Nov 21.
4
Comparative analysis of group information-guided independent component analysis and independent vector analysis for assessing brain functional network characteristics in autism spectrum disorder.用于评估自闭症谱系障碍脑功能网络特征的群体信息引导独立成分分析和独立向量分析的比较分析
Front Neurosci. 2023 Oct 19;17:1252732. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1252732. eCollection 2023.
5
Identification of Homogeneous Subgroups from Resting-State fMRI Data.基于静息态 fMRI 数据的同质亚组识别。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Mar 20;23(6):3264. doi: 10.3390/s23063264.
6
Brain-wide network analysis of resting-state neuromagnetic data.静息态脑磁图数据的全脑网络分析。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2023 Jun 15;44(9):3519-3540. doi: 10.1002/hbm.26295. Epub 2023 Mar 29.
7
A roadmap of brain recovery in a mouse model of concussion: insights from neuroimaging.脑震荡小鼠模型中的大脑恢复路线图:神经影像学的见解。
Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2021 Jan 6;9(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s40478-020-01098-y.
8
Adaptive constrained independent vector analysis: An effective solution for analysis of large-scale medical imaging data.自适应约束独立向量分析:一种用于大规模医学成像数据分析的有效解决方案。
IEEE J Sel Top Signal Process. 2020 Oct;14(6):1255-1264. doi: 10.1109/jstsp.2020.3003891. Epub 2020 Jun 22.
9
Independent vector analysis for common subspace analysis: Application to multi-subject fMRI data yields meaningful subgroups of schizophrenia.用于公共子空间分析的独立向量分析:应用于多受试者功能磁共振成像数据可得出有意义的精神分裂症亚组。
Neuroimage. 2020 Aug 1;216:116872. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116872. Epub 2020 Apr 28.
10
Evolution of spatial and temporal features of functional brain networks across the lifespan.大脑功能网络在整个生命周期中的时空特征演变。
Neuroimage. 2018 Jun;173:498-508. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.02.066. Epub 2018 Mar 6.
健康组和精神分裂症组在任务和休息期间的功能连接的调制。
Neuroimage. 2012 Sep;62(3):1694-704. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.05.048. Epub 2012 May 24.
4
Capturing inter-subject variability with group independent component analysis of fMRI data: a simulation study.基于 fMRI 数据的组独立成分分析捕获组间变异性:一项模拟研究。
Neuroimage. 2012 Feb 15;59(4):4141-59. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.010. Epub 2011 Oct 14.
5
Increase in sensorimotor cortex response to somatosensory stimulation over subacute poststroke period correlates with motor recovery in hemiparetic patients.感觉运动皮层对体感刺激的反应在亚急性期卒中后增加与偏瘫患者的运动功能恢复相关。
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2012 May;26(4):325-34. doi: 10.1177/1545968311421613. Epub 2011 Sep 27.
6
A baseline for the multivariate comparison of resting-state networks.静息态网络的多元比较基准。
Front Syst Neurosci. 2011 Feb 4;5:2. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2011.00002. eCollection 2011.
7
Comparison of multi-subject ICA methods for analysis of fMRI data.多体素独立成分分析方法在 fMRI 数据分析中的比较。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2011 Dec;32(12):2075-95. doi: 10.1002/hbm.21170. Epub 2010 Dec 15.
8
Dynamic functional reorganization of the motor execution network after stroke.脑卒后运动执行网络的动态功能重组。
Brain. 2010 Apr;133(Pt 4):1224-38. doi: 10.1093/brain/awq043. Epub 2010 Mar 30.
9
Long-term effects of temporal lobe epilepsy on local neural networks: a graph theoretical analysis of corticography recordings.颞叶癫痫对局部神经网络的长期影响:皮质图记录的图论分析。
PLoS One. 2009 Nov 26;4(11):e8081. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008081.
10
Functional neural network analysis in frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease using EEG and graph theory.使用脑电图(EEG)和图论对额颞叶痴呆和阿尔茨海默病进行功能性神经网络分析。
BMC Neurosci. 2009 Aug 21;10:101. doi: 10.1186/1471-2202-10-101.